The Moral Ambiguity of Julius Caesar

812 Words2 Pages

Phillip Pullman, a British author, once wrote, “I stopped believing there was a power of good and a power of evil that were outside us. And I came to believe that good and evil are names for what people do, not for what they are”(goodreads.com). Pullman’s quotation on the actions of man being the source of good and evil closely relate to morality, principles regarding the distinction of right and wrong or a person’s values. The question of what human morality truly is has been pondered by philosophers, common folk, and writers for thousands of years. However, sometimes a person’s ethics are unclear; he or she are not wholly good or bad but, rather, morally ambiguous. William Shakespeare, an English playwrite, heavily presses the topic moral ambiguity in his play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. The titular character, Julius Caesar, is a morally equivocal character who serves a major purpose in the play.
Julius Caesar is a moral, ethical man. He is a selfless man who puts others before himself. When Artemidorus gets word of the conspirator’s plans, he writes a letter to Caesar to warn him of his impending fate and rushes to the Capitol to give him word. Upon telling Caesar the letter is concerning him, Caesar simply brushes it off and responds, “What touches oneself shall be served last”(III,I, 8). Caesar altruistically puts aside an urgent manner concerning him to accept the offer of becoming King of Rome, which is the reason he went to the Capitol in the first place, which shows he is a benevolent, thoughtful person. In
Caesar’s eyes, he put aside an issue concerning him to serve Rome as king which shows he had good intentions. Additionally, Julius Caesar is a generous individual. Even in death, Caesar conti...

... middle of paper ...

...valent morality is to make readers feel and understand Brutus’s internal struggle of choosing between the life of his friend and the future of his homeland. The author shows the readers the two sides of Caesar, a moral, good man and an immoral, detestable person, to make the reader decide whether or not Caesar should die. Having readers feel conflicted about Caesar makes them understand Brutus’s conflict and get them thinking on whether or not Caesar truly deserves to die. It teaches the readers that it can be difficult to differentiate between right and wrong, and it can be challenging to do the right thing, especially when it could result in dire consequences.

Works Cited

Phillip Pullman. 2001-2013 goodreads.com. December 15, 2013
William Shakespeare. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Prestwick House Literary Touchstone Classics, 2006. Print.

More about The Moral Ambiguity of Julius Caesar

Open Document