More handpicked essays just for you.
Specific research on Julius Caesar
Characters of julius caesar and their role
Julius caesars influence on roman empire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“For the average Roman, Caesar’s rule was a blessing” (article, “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman). Gaius Julius Caesar was no tyrant; he was a hero. Heroes do good for the people and that’s exactly what Caesar did all throughout Rome by making sure the Romans had more than what they needed to survive.
Julius Caesar was considered a hero to the Romans because of how and what he did to benefit the people. Caesar created jobs, water flow, more food production, and good sanitation. Before Caesar came along the Romans barely had anything and struggled to make ends meet. In the article “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman, the article states “Supplying Rome with more grain than the city needed. The hungry hordes in the city were now given free bread. Caesar created jobs by building roads, temples, and aqueducts. Fresh water flowed freely in fountains throughout the city.” Caesar was considered a hero by fixing the Roman’s lives and putting his selfishness
…show more content…
to the side to focus on others. Without Caesar, Rome would be ruled by the senate that didn’t care about the Roman people at all. Caesar did more than just supply the Romans with the essentials, he went above and beyond. He expanded the land, “his marvelous conquests of Gaul and Egypt,” and knew the way to the Romans hearts through chariot races and gladiatorial games. Caesar was a sole ruler and Rome had never been run that good. He was considered a god and a hero by the people for all his good doings. Admittedly, there are some who believe Julius Caesar was a tyrant.
They believe due to his hunger for power, “Whatever good Caesar brought to Rome would soon be outweighed by his mad quest for power” that Caesar would change and enslave the Romans just like the dictator in the past. The people who believed he was a tyrant was because Caesar promised after fixing Rome he would give the power back to the senate but never did. However, if Caesar gave the power back to the senate everything would be ruined and go back to Rome’s old ways, “The senate has ruled Rome poorly, caring more about their own squabbles then the people.” Caesar changed the lives of the Romans and saved them from the senate, which means Caesar deserved the power after all he had done. The other side is wrong because if Caesar wanted to enslave the Romans he wouldn’t have done as much that benefited them. The hunger for power showed he wanted to do more for the Romans, expand the land, and rule greatly. Therefore Caesar is more than some ruler, he was a
hero. Julius Caesar did all he could to keep Rome on track. If Caesar didn’t step in and help with food supply, jobs, and sanitation then Rome would’ve crumbled. “To the people Caesar was more god than man. Mindlessly they worshipped him.” He was a true hero to Rome.
In the story “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman, it is apparent that Julius Caesar was a Roman hero. Caesar had done many great things for Rome, like conquering territory and making it a place the citizens had pride to live in. Julius Caesar may have not been a hero like Batman or Superman, but he surely should be viewed as a hero in history forever. The senators of Rome who murdered Caesar even knew he was a hero. They only killed him because they were threatened by the great amount of power Caesar had. Julius Caesar had the approval of a high amount of Roman citizens, they all loved him. How could they not? He was a hero and an outstanding leader!
During the Republic, the people of Rome had a major disinclination towards any sort of Royalty, which is why when Caesar attempted to lead undemocratically indefinitely, he disrupted one of the core stances that romans shared communally. Caesar over indulged in power when he retitled himself as ‘dictator in perpetuo’. “And as Caesar was coming down from Alba into the city they ventured to hail him as king. But at this the people were confounded, and Caesar, disturbed in mind, said that his name was not King, but Caesar, and seeing that his words produced an universal silence, he passed on with no very cheerful or contented looks…..But the most open and deadly hatred towards him was produced by his passion for the royal power.” Caesars egotism and self-importance made him uncherished by members of the senate. “Everybody knew that Caesar's ego would never allow him to play second fiddle to another senator, and it was equally well-known that another famous military leader, Pompey the Great, had similar ambitions. In January 49, more or less at...
In the movie Little Caesar the plot is based on the rise and fall of crime lord Rico Bandello (played by Edward Robinson), and his friend Joe who eventually wants to leave the business in crime.
When he repeatedly made reforms that aided the poor or veterans, the senate became worried. The senate was mostly concerned with personal gain so when Caesar stepped in and changed the tide, the senate became worried. They saw him as a tyrant with too much power who needed to be stopped. The senate did not like a democratic person taking full control over Rome as they would have no power. The only solution to this was to assassinate Caesar. The opinion of the sentence was, “Achievement was worthy of praise and honor, but excessive achievement was pernicious and a threat to the state.” (Holland). As Caesar grew, he made more laws which aided more growth. This cycle of growth seemed more and more dangerous to the senate, as they feared someone with this level of power. With all of the influence of Rome in one man, many felt Caesar took on a dictatorial
He was making needed reforms and did good things for Rome. When they assassinated Caesar they opened a door to corruption and less order. While Caesar wasn’t in the Plebian class because of all his wealth and power, he made changes that many of them liked. Caesar was true to his people and that’s why he was well liked. He treated them all with respect. With such a well-liked leader assassination or murder of him will make many angry and without such reasoning the Conspirators are left in a troubled
In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, one must read the text closely to track the shifting motivations and loyalties of each character as the play progresses. An important factor that must be kept in mind while reading is the degree of loyalty, in other words, the degree to which characters act out of a motivation to help others. Throughout the play, each character's current degree of loyalty to others is clearly exhibited by words or behavior – this holds true for the characters of Brutus, Cassius, Antony, Portia, and Calpurnia. The focus on loyalty is critical because before the play ends an even-handed justice is meted out to a number of people who fail to live up to an expected standard of loyalty to others.
For thousands of years people have been talking about the great powerful Caesar. He is one of the greatest known dictators known to people today mostly because of all of the things he was able to accomplish during his rein as emperor. After reading primary sources about Caesar, it has given me a better understanding of what other people thought of him during this time period. It’s safe to say that Caesar was obsessed with power and respect from other people that would explain his thirst for war and land, which is one of his greatest strengths and helped in making Rome a great empire.
Would an honorable man murder his best friend? In William Shakespeare’s play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Caesar started as an innocent citizen of Rome, but soon made his way to the throne. Caesar started bettering Rome, but certain men accused him of becoming too ambitious. The conspirators, the men against Caesar, brutally murdered him because of his “ambition”. Marcus Brutus was Caesar’s supposed best friend but led the revolt against him. Brutus is characterized in the play as being gullible, noble, and naïve.
Julius Caesar was one of the most important political and military leaders in the history of Rome, with many major achievements. Caesar is known to have never lost a single war. His most honorable conquests include the capture of Gaul that extended the Rome boundaries to the Atlantic Ocean; and the Roman invasion of Britain. Julius was also a historian and an incredible orator. He authored many comprehensive journals, named Commentaries that provided the details of his military campaign. Caesar is also said to have produced Acta Diurna, which is the first newspaper that let the public know about the actions of the Assembly and the Senate. He was a successful statesman and changed several laws for the wellbeing if the public. He was the one who fixed the calendar because the days weren’t in pace with the seasons and suggested the science behind it. He was clearly one of the most important political and military leaders in the history of Rome
He won many great battles bringing back slaves back to Rome for freedom. He also brought gold and other spoils of war to his empire for the riches use. He was my friend, faithful and just to me, But Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honorable man. When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept. Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honorable man. I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition? Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, And sure he is an honorable man. (III.ii.82–96) Julius Caesar was admired by many of the great Roman senators who valued him for his acumen and courage. He had his solders under his complete control because the worshiped him so much. Even though Julius Caesar had a lot of pros being a good leader, he also had cons. He had deception towards his allies making him a little untrustworthy. In addition, to his rivals Caesar’s sportsmanship was not the best either since he was devious and
Julius Caesar was a great general and important leader in Ancient Rome. During his lifetime which lasted from 100 BC to 44 BC, he had held almost every important title in the Roman Republic including consul, tribune of people, high commander of the army and high priest. At a young age, he knew how important money was to the Roman politics and why the system was so corrupt. He suggested many new laws, which most of them were approved. He recognized the army and never lost a battle in the many he fought. He improved the way provinces were governed. He also shared his intelligence with the world by helping edit the calendar, and the romans rewarded him by naming a month after him. Julius Caesar was one of the greatest military minds and leaders in all of history which lead to an increase in the Roman economy, with happy citizens as a result. Julius Caesar was a trendsetter during his time and even after.
On one side of the argument you have those who supported Caesar and most all that he did for Rome as its ruler. These people acknowledge Caesar's military victories such as those in Gaul and Britannia where he ousted the barbaric enemies of Rome. They believe that he was a brilliant leader during both times of war, and times of peace. Caesar is also admired by them for his clemency toward his enemies after the conflict with Pompey and the mercy that he generously bestowed upon them. Additionally these people most certainly include the loyal Soldiers of Caesar that followed him without question. All of these Romans believed that Caesar made Rome t...
Caesar’s power in Rome was growing, and people were afraid he was going to turn Rome into a monarchy. However, Caesar did not want to be known as a king, but he was appointed dictator for life.
If you touch a butterfly's wing it will die. Just like how stabbing somebody 23 times will kill them. This is exactly what happened to Julius Caesar so many years ago when he was on his way to senate with some “friends”. These friends of Caesar's thought it was necessary to murder him because he was ambitious and they feared him and what he would do once he had complete control. It was their belief that Caesar would begin acting in favor of himself instead of the people of Rome. What they thought was not true however and Caesar did not deserve to be murdered.
Julius Caesar is remembered as one of the greatest military minds in history and credited with arranging the basis for the Roman Empire. Caesar’s military brilliance bought Rome more land and more power, which led into the increase of size and strength of Rome. Caesar’s dictatorship helped the strength in Rome. Julius Caesar was assassinated which lead to a monarchy that was ruled by Octavin. Caesar’s death caused an effect to the collapse of the Roman Empire. Many people today in the 21st century try and follow the greatness of Julius Caesar. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a tragedy with the contributions Caesar made to strengthen Rome’s success.