Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
If you touch a butterfly's wing it will die. Just like how stabbing somebody 23 times will kill them. This is exactly what happened to Julius Caesar so many years ago when he was on his way to senate with some “friends”. These friends of Caesar's thought it was necessary to murder him because he was ambitious and they feared him and what he would do once he had complete control. It was their belief that Caesar would begin acting in favor of himself instead of the people of Rome. What they thought was not true however and Caesar did not deserve to be murdered. The conspirators thought they should kill Caesar because he was ambitious, and he certainly was. His conquests brought wealth and slaves to Rome. He was often seen with tears in his when
he saw poverty and gave his own gold to homeless people. In his will he not only left a part of his fortune to every roman citizen but he also left his estates to become public recreation areas. Is ambition really a bad thing if this is what it accomplishes?
Basically Caesar had many people disagree with his actions so they assassinated him.
Caesar for some what of a good reason. Brutus killed him because he thought it would be better for Rome while the others just did not want him to become more powerful than themselves. They are the same. Brutus felt that the death of Caesar would be the end of the absolute rule that Caesar presently had a. Brutus is a supporter of the republican government. Brutus says, "We all stand up against the spirit of Caesar /
Every year fast food kills many or infects many with a higher chance of heart attacks diabetes and more. Caesar Barber of New York had a heart attack. He weighed 300 pounds and ate fast food 4-5 times a week. Barber claims “It should have a warning label it claims 100% beef”. The areas Caesar went to were Burger King, KFC, Wendy’s, and McDonald's. Caesar Barber sued the restaurants for like I said earlier 100% beef. I believe it is Caesar’s fault for his problems because of all the reports.
Caesar was sole consul and at times acted like a king. The senate did not like this because the Romans held the tradition of a hatred of kings. It was then that the senate believed that Julius Caesar was a threat to the Republic. The senate and everyone liked Caesar, but they had decided that the best way to save the Republic was to assassinate Caesar. This was yet another piece of the game that was pulled out of the structure of the Roman Republic. Yes, the Romans were able to destroy the person that they thought was the threat to the Republic, but it was the position not the person that was the threat. With Julius Caesar gone, the void was still there for someone to fill.
In the story “Killing of Caesar”, by Jon Herman, Caesar is questioned to be a hero or a tyrant. “Sanitation, Sewage, and food all were seemingly under the control of Caesar”. Caesar provided for the people unlike the senate did. Gave to the people instead of taking like other ruler ships would do.
“For the average Roman, Caesar’s rule was a blessing” (article, “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman). Gaius Julius Caesar was no tyrant; he was a hero. Heroes do good for the people and that’s exactly what Caesar did all throughout Rome by making sure the Romans had more than what they needed to survive.
Albert Camus once said “Rebellion cannot exist without the feeling that somewhere, in some way, you are justified.” This is relevant because the reasons that Brutus gives for killing Caesar makes the conspiracy justifiable. Brutus should join the conspiracy to kill Caesar because of what Caesar may ruin in Rome. First, Caesar is on the verge of becoming the king of Rome and the roman people stand for a republic. Second, if Caesar becomes king he will probably be crude to his citizens. Finally, Caesar will turn his back to the citizens once he becomes king.
In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, there are speeches between the characters Antony and Brutus about Caesar’s death. Antony present’s a stronger and more effective argument. This is because he uses his innocence and isn’t indirect within his argument. Also, he uses emotion and repetition that really increase the strength of his argument.
Although Gaius Julius Caesar was a prominent figure in the history of Rome- well-known for his unprecedented actions while in power such as becoming dictator for life among others- people debate whether his death was justified or not. Some argue it was not justified because there were not enough reasons to kill him despite becoming dictator for life, while others argue that it was justified because there was a possibility that he wanted to become a king. The latter represented a strong reason to kill him because since Rome became a republic, one of its main aims has been to punish harshly those who exhibit a potential of gaining too much power and turning the republic into a monarchy. However, I believe Caesar’s assassination was not morally
Julius Caesar was murdered by his own co-workers and the Senate in 44 BC. He said he wanted what was best and fair for the Roman Republic, however he managed to instead absorb total power; he was self-centered, and this ultimately lead to his strategized death. When Caesar died, the republic fell and Rome became an empire with one supreme leader. All in all, Julius Caesar brought death upon himself and earned this unfortunate punishment.
They were jealous of his power and the Ultimately, Caesar’s pride helped cause the end of his life. He was so self-absorbed and so confident that Decius was telling him the truth that Calpurnia’s dream was taken the wrong way. Noble Caesar believed the Roman citizens loved him and that he was their lifeblood, but really they wanted him gone. It is possible that Caesar would have been killed by the conspirators another day, but since he did not listen to what the soothsayer and his own wife had to say, he was tragically taken for
In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar's assassination brings up many important moral questions, most importantly that of whether Caesar's death was justified. During Caesar’s process of becoming the emperor of Rome, he takes humble approaches to become a suitable ruler for Rome. Even though he does everything right and takes precise steps to becoming emperor, he is still very despised. A group of conspirators end up murdering Caesar out of pure arrogance. Essentially, Julius Caesar’s murder was not justified because the men would construct reasons out of their own jealousy and anger to justify Caesar’s death.
The senate killed Caesar for the good of Rome. Caesar was too ambitious. He wanted too much. He was always looking for more and was thirsty for more things. Even Marc Anthony, one of Caesar’s best friends admits “The noble Brutus/Hath told you Caesar was ambitious:/If it were so, it was a grievous fault/And grievously hath Caesar answer'd it” (III,i,67-70) and admits Caesar was on the path to
Sakespear's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar holds two possible candidates for a tragic hero, however Brutus fits the persona best. The true definition of a tragic hero, as found by Aristotle, is a character who falls from a high standing to a low standing. They suffer enourmous loss, but are eventually enlightened of their own flaw or flaws. Initially the play begins with Caesar returning to Rome from defeating Pompey. Meanwhile, the first seeds of conspiracy are begining to take root. Although Brutus ignores Cassius's chiding to join the conspirators his tragic flaw of being easily molded and persuaded lead him to fall prey and join. As time progresses Brutus makes many grievous errors, and his flawed logic leads him to become bereft of all he once held dear. In the end, preceding his death, Brutus grasps the fact that he has no one to blame for his loss but himself; thus the enlightenment. All of these characteristics classify Brutus as the tragic hero of this play.
Julius Caesar was a powerful king. Too much power even. That’s what conspirators Cassius, Casca, Cinna and many others thought. They believed in another individual who would be a better leader; Marcus Brutus. Brutus was noble, honorable, and ambitious. He had just enough ambition for him to be a good ruler. This wasn’t the case for Caesar. Caesar wanted so much power and right away too. He had ruled the Roman Empire; which was thought to be the entire world at the time. If there was more power to be absorbed, Caesar would have gone any length to achieve that power. This caused people to be afraid of him, and more importantly; despised him. It was one of his most fatal flaws! (No pun intended) Yes, maybe some people were too blind to see it, but the conspirators who took action, saw it.