In the story “Killing of Caesar”, by Jon Herman, Caesar is questioned to be a hero or a tyrant. “Sanitation, Sewage, and food all were seemingly under the control of Caesar”. Caesar provided for the people unlike the senate did. Gave to the people instead of taking like other ruler ships would do. Caesar did things for the people of Rome. “Caesar created jobs by buildings, roads, temples, and aqueducts”, this made the lower class of Rome happy, because more jobs means more money to go around. Caesar gave the people a hand into a descent financial stable life. Unlike the senate did, “The senate ruled Rome poorly, caring more about their own political squabbles than the people”. But Caesar didn’t do that. Furthermore Caesar gave the people events, “Caesar put on near constant chariot races and gladiatorial games”. For Rome Caesar was a blessing from the heavens. Caesar taking the time to please the people and rule efficiently too. He also saved people by his well connections, “The hungry hordes in the city were now given free bread”. Because of the shipment ordered, and “now continuously sailed up the Tiber …show more content…
River supplying Rome with more grain than the city needed”. Hence making more food for Rome, saving Rome from starvation. Admittedly, it is believable to some thought he was a tyrant, because of his mad mission for more power.
Some thought he was always a sneaky person, and should not have the throne. Usually people would think Caesar was a thief for stealing the senate’s spot of ruler ship of Rome. Others may thin that he had no good intention, but to rule and for and for him to thrive in the riches of Rome. However these can be proven wrong by all the good deeds he performed to gain the people’s trust. Caesar built, gave, and introduced a new lifestyle to Rome for the better. “The hungry hordes in the city were now given free bread”, feeding those who were low class that the Senate didn’t worry about. He gave a lot and doing a lot like keeping Rome clean, providing food, and everything, all were seemingly under control of Caesar. Therefore Caesar being a hero is more
legit. “Sanitation, sewage, and food, all were seemingly under Caesar’s control”. Caesar did it all for the people of Rome. He knew how it felt to be low in the world. So he achieved all that in order to keep the people of Rome happy with their lives, and they were happy because of him. Which made Caesar a hero, because he fixed so much damage. Caesar gave food, celebrations, and life to the streets of Rome saving it from disaster.
They think he ruled by force and didn’t care for his people. These people basically see Caesar as just being a power-hungry leader. However, it is clear in the way he helps his people live a better life that Julius Caesar was in fact a true hero. If Caesar was a tyrant, he would have ruled by force and Rome would have had much stricter laws. Also, Julius Caesar would have been focused on getting absolute power and not leading a military into conquering territory. If he was really hungry for power, he could set rules to make life tough on Romans. Instead, he dedicated his time into making life better for all citizens, especially ones of the middle and lower classes. Therefore, Julius Caesar was clearly a hero to the Roman Empire.
... he was killed, all hope for the Roman Republic to be cured and survive was lost. By killing him, the senators ensured that the Roman Republic would either fall or continue to be corrupted. Had Julius Caesar not been killed, the Roman Republic could have been revived and cured of corruption and the Roman Empire might never have existed.
He was making needed reforms and did good things for Rome. When they assassinated Caesar they opened a door to corruption and less order. While Caesar wasn’t in the Plebian class because of all his wealth and power, he made changes that many of them liked. Caesar was true to his people and that’s why he was well liked. He treated them all with respect. With such a well-liked leader assassination or murder of him will make many angry and without such reasoning the Conspirators are left in a troubled
On one side of the argument you have those who supported Caesar and most all that he did for Rome as its ruler. These people acknowledge Caesar's military victories such as those in Gaul and Britannia where he ousted the barbaric enemies of Rome. They believe that he was a brilliant leader during both times of war, and times of peace. Caesar is also admired by them for his clemency toward his enemies after the conflict with Pompey and the mercy that he generously bestowed upon them. Additionally these people most certainly include the loyal Soldiers of Caesar that followed him without question. All of these Romans believed that Caesar made Rome t...
“Caesar was a brilliant general, a clever engineer, and administrator of genius, and a leader who demanded and commanded loyalty. He also was a corrupt politician” (Dando-Collins 4). Caesar would go on to be a dictator and his gain in power would corrupt him. He often bypassed the Senate, taking their power away. With Caesar’s growing power the Senate feared that they would soon lose their political relevance.
Known as a general, a political icon, a dictator, and, to some, even king, Caesar had many honors and titles. After defeating Pompey’s sons, Caesar was named dictator for life. Soon after, he was offered the position of king. Because of the Romans hatred for kings, he refused. (Gruen, 13). Julius Caesar was considered “supreme over all” (Combee, 95).
Julius Caesar was able to gain the support of the people by improving the life of the common people. When Caesar came to power as consul, the people in Rome were dealing with many issues such as debt and unemployment. Therefore, he proposed several new laws, many of which were approved by the senate. These reforms included giving grain to only those in need and giving newly conquered land in Carthage and Corinth to soldiers and landless peasants. The dependency of slave labor was causing an unemployment problem in Rome. In a response to this problem Julius Caesar limited the number of slaves that an estate could have so the lower class people would have work. He reduced taxes and made collections fair for all people also he expanded the geographical size of the Roman Empire considerably. He allowed the people in Sicily, Spain and Gaul to become Roman citizens, whi...
things that threatened the power of the Senate. Caesar was loved by the common people. He
Julius Caesar is remembered as one of the greatest military minds in history and credited with arranging the basis for the Roman Empire. Caesar’s military brilliance bought Rome more land and more power, which led into the increase of size and strength of Rome. Caesar’s dictatorship helped the strength in Rome. Julius Caesar was assassinated which lead to a monarchy that was ruled by Octavin. Caesar’s death caused an effect to the collapse of the Roman Empire. Many people today in the 21st century try and follow the greatness of Julius Caesar. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a tragedy with the contributions Caesar made to strengthen Rome’s success.
https://www.ancient.eu/Julius_Caesar/ “As long as Caesar was a public servant he was safe from prosecution by his Optimate enemies for hislegal indiscretions but, once his consulship ended, he was sure to be indicted. Further, Caesar was deeplyin debt, both financially and politically, to Crassus, and needed to raise both money and his prestige.” Julius Caesar used his power as a public servant to not get prosecuted by his enemies. He was deep in debt and had to raise money and is prestige. He was always in trouble throughout his reign and used his power to not get prosecuted by his enemies which makes him a tragic hero. https://www.history.com/topics/ancient-history/julius-caesar “Caesar invaded Italy and drove Pompey into Macedonia in less than seventy
Caesar’s legacy lives on for years after his death, as the scope of his impact is among the largest for any leader. At a time when Rome did not have a calendar of its own, Caesar established his Julian calendar, a system still in use to this day. This was just one of the many things he did to increase the stability and uniformity in Rome. Caesar saw how ineffective and dysfunctional the Roman government was all throughout his childhood, and when he became an adult he went out and changed the government. Although his methods were controversial, no one can deny that Caesar took an ineffective government and made it effective again. Not only did he increase the power of Rome for years to come, he also increased the jobs in Rome. Even though he decreased the power of the senate as a whole through shifting the majority of the control to himself, Caesar created jobs by adding over 300 additional senators into office. Caesar also created more revenue by conquering territories, as he opened up new trading posts and room for growth in the Roman economy. Caesar also constructed many new buildings throughout Rome in an effort to enhance the look of his empire. This created new construction jobs, and overall increased the industrial growth of Rome. This growth helped Rome stay strong even after his death. Caesar influenced the future in another way, although it was unintentional. His war tactics and strategies are still observed and highly regarded to this day, and influenced many leaders after his death. His will to never give up and push on through hardship has been admired by leaders for centries. Caesar summarized his military tactics best himself when he said, “I came, I saw, I
Gaius Julius Caesar was born in Rome in July 100 BC. Rome was a Republic at this time. He was a statesman, Roman general, Consul, and notable author of Latin prose. He played a significant role in the events that led to the collapse of the Roman Republic and rise of the Roman Empire. He was a leader in a nation where the people were not involved in the government decision-making process. Thus, he had majority of the power in the Republic and was able to form a huge army. He was able to triumph, conquer new lands with the army at his grasp and command. As Caesar acquired more power over the years, som...
Julius Caesar may have been a noble person, but the people of Rome did not think so. In Julius Caesar, Shakespeare shows the Caesar comes to an unhappy end when he is murdered by the people he loved most. Within this play Julius Caesar is portrayed as a tragic hero. A tragic hero is defined as “the main character of a tragedy [who is] usually dignified, courageous, and high ranking” (Novel Study Guide). Also vital to defining a tragic hero is that, “the hero’s downfall is caused by a tragic flaw” (Novel Study Guide). It is evident that Julius Caesar is William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar is a tragic hero given that he is of noble stature, has a fatal flaw and comes to an unhappy end.
Caesar is a very powerful man and he knows it, but sometimes too much power can get to a person's head. He is a very power hungry and selfish person. A good government
	Shakespeare illustrated Caesar as a tragic hero by showing that he was a noble man of high rank. Every Roman followed his leadership and Caesar also defeated the great Pompey. First of all, At the Feast of Lupercal Caesar manipulated the commoners and made himself look noble to the commoners. Casca said, "Why there was a crown offered to him;...people fell a-shouting" (I,ii,221-223). Next, To show how noble and great Caesar was, the Romans would stand along the street sides to watch him pass by. "Madam not yet, I go to take my stand; /To see him pass on to the Capitol," said the soothsayer (II,iv,25-26). Finally, Caesar had the greatest rank possible as he would have been crowned king if it wasn’t for the conspiracy’s plot. As Casca said, "Indeed they say senators tomorrow; /Mean to establish Caesar as king..." (I,iii,87-88).