Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Julius Caesar effects on society
Specific research on Julius Caesar
Julius caesar full history in essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Julius Caesar effects on society
Many ancient Romans considered Julius Caesar to be a hero. But there were also those who thought of him as a tyrant. Caesar may have seemed like a tyrant but those people failed to see the good he did for Rome. Caesar was more of a hero then he is a tyrant. For example in “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman he was able to feed everyone including the homeless that the senators before him failed to help. He gained even more land for Rome to expand its empire. Also he took the jobs of the senators that were failing to govern the empire. Julius Caesar was a great leader for Rome. He was able to obtain large amounts of food. All the food combined was enough to hand out to all the hungry hordes of people in Rome who were not fed when the senators where in charge. “The hungry hordes in the city were now given free bread.” This shows that Caesar cares for all the people in Rome. Instead of keeping all the food for himself he handed it out to the people that needed it more. If Caesar was a …show more content…
They believe Caesar was a tyrant because he had too much power for any one man. Yes a tyrant is a ruler who has absolute power, and a ruler that take over with force. “He had to kill the most powerful man in the world.” This shows that they believed Caesar was to powerful and they did not like the idea of him having so much power. However Caesar was not a tyrant. Although Caesar did have a lot of power he used it to do what was best for the people of Rome. “To the people Caesar was more a god than man, mindlessly they worshipped him.” This shows that people were grateful for Caesar and what he did for Rome and the People of Rome. Therefore Caesar was truly a hero. Many considered Caesar to be a hero. Caesar did in fact do many heroic things for Rome. He took over when the senators could not govern Rome properly. Also Caesar was able to feed everyone in the city. Caesar might have seemed like a tyrant but he was truly a
Caesar, who was seen as a great leader of Rome. This point of view has
Even though he may not have been a hero like you would see in a comic book, Julius Caesar was surely heroic to the Roman people. His conquering of land, strength as a military leader, and care for his citizens all show his greatness. Also, many more than half of Roman citizens absolutely loved Caesar. Mainly middle and low class citizens, these people viewed Caesar as a leader who did an exceptional job in charge of
Julius Caesar was one of Rome’s most memorable leaders because of the wars he won and the way his life was ended. Caesar was born in 100 B.C. His mother was Aurelia Caesar who supposedly birthed him by Caesarean section. Caesar’s father was Gaius Caesar. His family had noble, patrician roots, but they were neither rich nor influential during this period. Although Caesar was only a noble he believed that he was higher than other mortals and viewed himself as a descendant of the gods. He looked very highly upon himself a...
Caesar was a man of great passion and effort: whatever he did, he gave it 100% effort. He has shown time and time again his honesty, his harshness, and his commitment to obtaining power. Julius Caesar was a positive leader because of his two greatest qualities: one being attention to image, that of himself and Rome, and that he always kept his word.
...e him a better dictator. One of his greatest traits was that he was able to rule with an iron fist, but in my opinion I don’t think he abused his power since all he was trying to do was make Rome a huge and dominant empire. Obviously people who didn’t know him too well didn’t understand him, which made him appear as a scary and ruthless ruler, but even Cicero was able to change his mind about Caesar before the Gallic war was over. In the end, Caesar was one of the best dictators our world has ever seen.
Julius Caesar was one of the most important political and military leaders in the history of Rome, with many major achievements. Caesar is known to have never lost a single war. His most honorable conquests include the capture of Gaul that extended the Rome boundaries to the Atlantic Ocean; and the Roman invasion of Britain. Julius was also a historian and an incredible orator. He authored many comprehensive journals, named Commentaries that provided the details of his military campaign. Caesar is also said to have produced Acta Diurna, which is the first newspaper that let the public know about the actions of the Assembly and the Senate. He was a successful statesman and changed several laws for the wellbeing if the public. He was the one who fixed the calendar because the days weren’t in pace with the seasons and suggested the science behind it. He was clearly one of the most important political and military leaders in the history of Rome
In order to properly evaluate Caesar as a ‘Great Man’, we must first establish the criteria by which he is to be judged, the criteria of the ‘Great Man’ Theory. According to Russell Hooks, author of an essay on the Great Man Theory, a ‘Great Man’ is an event-making man. A person who, through conscious will and extraordinary shows of leadership skills and intelligence, influences the flow of history. An event-making man does not cause events to happen by chance, such as through inheritance. He purposely alters the flow of history immensely from that which it would have been without his existence1. On the contrary, an eventful man is one who also alters the flow of history, yet did so through no incredible shows of his own talent. He is not unique in any way, and any other man would have done the same in his stead2. This is the difference between an event-making man, and a merely eventful man. So was Julius Caesar a truly great ‘event-making man’? Did he possess intelligence, cunning, and ambition beyond that of normal men? Did he, throughout his life, make conscious decisions to further his own greatness and change history? Yes, Caesar was indeed a great man, and was unique in many aspects.
And sure he is an honorable man. (III.ii.82–96) Julius Caesar was admired by many of the great Roman senators who valued him for his acumen and courage. He had his solders under his complete control because the worshiped him so much. Even though Julius Caesar had a lot of pros being a good leader, he also had cons.
Although Caesar took many ruthless actions to get to power, once he got there he was a good leader who did many good things. “He revised the Roman calendar, made the senate more representative of citizenry, and gave discharged soldiers and even the urban poor the opportunity to own a bit of land”. Caesar did many terrible things to get to power, but when he got there he did many things. It doesn’t mean that his actions were justified; only that he did a few good things when he finally got power. He killed thousands of people, married only for political reasons, feed people twisted stories about what he had actually accomplished, cared only about certain people, and often times had alternative motives for doing something nice. He did almost everything in his life just to gain more popularity, which in turn gave him more power. If Julius Caesar had not been so ruthless, how would the Roman Empire have turned out, and where would we be
.... His direct writing style made his book an example for other historical writings (Gruen,14). Because of this book, Caesar was considered a true hero (Combee,95).
Julius Caesar is remembered as one of the greatest military minds in history and credited with arranging the basis for the Roman Empire. Caesar’s military brilliance bought Rome more land and more power, which led into the increase of size and strength of Rome. Caesar’s dictatorship helped the strength in Rome. Julius Caesar was assassinated which lead to a monarchy that was ruled by Octavin. Caesar’s death caused an effect to the collapse of the Roman Empire. Many people today in the 21st century try and follow the greatness of Julius Caesar. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a tragedy with the contributions Caesar made to strengthen Rome’s success.
Was Julius Caesar a hero, or a villain? That question may be a tough decision for some to answer. He did some marvelous things, and he did some awful things, but overall Julius Caesar was a hero. Caesar was a great leader because he was a skilled general during battle, fed and provided for the poor, and governed Rome by himself. Caesar may have made some bad decisions in his life, but over all he helped Rome in copious amount of ways.
https://www.ancient.eu/Julius_Caesar/ “As long as Caesar was a public servant he was safe from prosecution by his Optimate enemies for hislegal indiscretions but, once his consulship ended, he was sure to be indicted. Further, Caesar was deeplyin debt, both financially and politically, to Crassus, and needed to raise both money and his prestige.” Julius Caesar used his power as a public servant to not get prosecuted by his enemies. He was deep in debt and had to raise money and is prestige. He was always in trouble throughout his reign and used his power to not get prosecuted by his enemies which makes him a tragic hero. https://www.history.com/topics/ancient-history/julius-caesar “Caesar invaded Italy and drove Pompey into Macedonia in less than seventy
Julius Caesar may have been a noble person, but the people of Rome did not think so. In Julius Caesar, Shakespeare shows the Caesar comes to an unhappy end when he is murdered by the people he loved most. Within this play Julius Caesar is portrayed as a tragic hero. A tragic hero is defined as “the main character of a tragedy [who is] usually dignified, courageous, and high ranking” (Novel Study Guide). Also vital to defining a tragic hero is that, “the hero’s downfall is caused by a tragic flaw” (Novel Study Guide). It is evident that Julius Caesar is William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar is a tragic hero given that he is of noble stature, has a fatal flaw and comes to an unhappy end.
There is a theory that if we were to see a clone of ourselves we would not be able to recognize them right away. We do not know what we look like in person. We have only seen our faces through reflections and pictures. However, those can be deceiving because our perception of how we look is different from how we appear in reality to other people. Similarly, Shakespeare uses the motif of eyes, mirrors, and reflections in Act 1 Scene 2 of Julius Caesar in the conversation between Brutus and Cassius in order propel the plot forward by using it as a way for Cassius to convince Brutus into murdering Caesar as well as spur the reader to think about good and bad in society and whether an unjust person can perform an unjust deed.