Structure In Henry Mintzberg's Structure Of Research On Organization Design

1242 Words3 Pages

“STRUCTURE IN 5’S: SYNTHESIS OF RESEARCH ON ORGANIZATION DESIGN”
“HENRY MINTZBERG”
Introduction:
According to Henry Mintzberg, there are five basic types of configurations on which the structures of diferent organizations is based. Every organization is different and therefore requires a different and compatible structure to carry out its operations. These five configurations are as follows:
• Simple Structure
• Machine Bureaucracy
• Professional Bureaucracy
• Divisionalized Form
• Adhocracy

THE SIMPLE STRUCTURE:
Typically, simple structure has little or no technostructre, a loose divisional labour, few support staffers, differentiation among its unit is minimal, and a small middle line hierarchy. The behaviour of simple structure is little …show more content…

Single individual can comprehend the simple environment, that allows decision making to be in control of that individual. A dynamic environment can be defined as organic structure as the future of the organization can not be predicted, the organization cannot affect cordination by standardization. The best example of sinmple structure is of course the entrepreneurial firm. The firm is often aggressive and innovative, searching continually for risky environments where hesitation bounds the bureaucracies to operate. But it is also important to remain in a niche market that can be fully comprehended by its entrepreneur. Usually entrepreneurial firms are small sized so that they can remain organic and the owner can have tight control over the firm. All revovles aroud the entrepreneur inside the structure, the firm’s goals are his goals, his vision is firm’s vision and his loss is the firm’s …show more content…

WOODWARD, J., Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice, Oxford Univ. Press, 1965.
5. BURNS AND STALKER, G. M., The Management of Innovation, 2nd ed., Tavistock, 1966.
6. CROZIER, M., The Bureaucratic Phenomenon, English trans., Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1964.
7. LAWRENCE, P. R. AND LORSCH, J. W., Organization and Environment, Irwin, Homewood, Ill., 1967.
8. PUGH, D. S., HICKSON, D. J., HININGS, C. R. AND TURNER, C., "Dimensions of Organization Structure," Admin. Sci. Quart. (1968), pp. 65-105.
9. THOMPSON, J. D., Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.
10. WRIGLEY, L., Diversification and Divisional Autonomy, D. B. A. thesis, Harvard Business School, 1970.
11. RUMELT, R. P., Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1974.
12. CHANDLER, M. K. AND SAYLES, L. B., Managing Large Systems, Harper & Row, New York, 1971
13. WOODWARD, J., Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice, Oxford Univ. Press, 1965.
14. LAWRENCE, P. R. AND LORSCH, J. W., Organization and Environment, Irwin, Homewood, Ill., 1967.
15. GALBRAITH, J. R., Designing Complex Organizations, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.,

Open Document