Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Structural functionalism
Perspective of symbolic interactionism
Structural functionalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Structural functionalism
There are two kinds of people in the world when analyzing a problem; one kind that search for details to break the problem down and the other that view the subject as a whole. Each type of method works in today’s world on many disciplines. In the field of sociology, symbolic interactionism and structural functionalism are two of the main theories to apply as sociologists are analyzing social problems. The two perspectives are quite different on the usual level of analysis; Symbolic interactionism examines small patterns of social interactions while structural functionalism examines large-scale patterns of society. An analogic thinking can be applied to the two theories whereas symbolic interactionism is like looking subjects through microscope …show more content…
Subject is broke down to smaller parts and showed in great details. I still remember the first time I was introduced to a microscope on science class; the drop of water under the lens became completely unfamiliar since all I saw was colorful free-floating plankton. It’s fascinating because the water seemed transparent through my naked eyes. Later I learned how the microscope enables people to see things in a whole new level of perspective. Symbolic interactionism works the similar way as a microscope of the society since it is micro sociological. The theory studies the symbols of everything within the society. In the perspective of symbolic interactionism, symbols tell people how they are related to others and know they should act towards them. At the micro level of face to face interaction, symbolic interactionists study how people use symbols to create social life. The theory studies every subject’s meaning within the society in order to examine how one certain subject is related to a social problem. One of the key aspects of symbolic interactionism is that a single thing does not exist objectively unless it interacts within the society. People's understanding of things’ meanings can change due to the process of social interaction. Overall, symbolic interactionism is everything about analyzing how social life depends on the way we define ourselves and others and looking at smaller parts of the big picture. This concept is much like seeing the society through the lens of a
D) They were among the first faculty members in the sociology department at the University of Chicago. The answer could not be B) They were all sociologists who won Nobel Prizes for their work in social reform, because that was Jane Adams and Frances Perkins. In addition, the answer could not be C) They all established major sub disciplines in sociology, because only of the three, George Herman Mead, was one of the founders of symbolic interactionism.
The symbolic interactionist perspective looks at society as the result of interactions between people. People in society interpret each other’s behaviors. Symbolic meanings often override the facts of something. Human trafficking can be analyzed in the symbolic interactionist perspective. The symbolic interactionist perspective looks at society as the result of interactions between people.
Symbolic Interactionism/Page 23: A theoretical perspective in which society is viewed as composed of symbols that people use to establish meaning, develop their views of the world, and communicate with one another.
Sociology is the study of society and the interactions that occur within society itself. There are numerous methods of analyzing societies and the way the function, nonetheless, most methods fall in micro and macro level theories. Micro level theories allow sociologist to study smaller relationships such as individual or compact groups of people. On the other hand, macro level studies permit for larger scale investigations to take place. With both of these theories there are three theoretical perspectives used in sociology. Micro level theories include symbolic interactionism which focuses in interactions done with language and gestures and the means which allow such interactions to take place. Macro level theories include structural functionalism
The main points of the Symbolic Interactionism perspective is that symbols are what shape how we communicate and how we view the world. Our changing ideas affect how we understand and view different things around us. Without symbols society would be not be very coordinated, people wouldn’t be able to specify a specific time for school or where to meet for lunch. The main points of the Functional Analysis perspective, is that society is made up of several individual parts that work together for society to function properly. Each of these smaller parts has functions that are beneficial consequences of people actions and dysfunctions that are harmful and threaten the equilibrium. In this perspective the smaller parts are look at to see how they
What happens when a cog in a machine decides to rotate in a different direction? If an organ in the body decides to shut down? The respective system would need to adjust to this deviance in order to compensate for its shortcomings; this happens in society as well. The sociological perspective of structural functionalism deals primarily with this way of thinking – each part of society functions together to contribute towards the whole. The United States currently accounts for five percent of the world’s population, yet twenty-five percent of the world’s prison population; according to the sociological perspective of structural functionalism, this is due to interrelated parts of society failing to fulfill their duties, social facts not being
In symbolic interaction we communicate with other people through roles that we assign to them, the way we label them, or how we act in accordance to what this person symbolizes to us. Often we assign labels, or roles to other people by knowing them from before. It is focused on individual interactions with other people, things or the events. One thing can symbolize one thing to me, but it can mean something else to another individual. Since we view the same thing differently, we will interact towards that thing or individual in different ways. An example of this is, rainy day for my kids means fun in the water, walking through mud, and just enjoying the day. To me the same rainy day means, lots of dirty clothes, mud all over the floor. It is important to remember that someone’s symbolic interaction can change. It is fully focused on micro sociology, only focusing on interactions between individuals. It states that we interact and change according to our prior experiences and interactions. Two sociologists that are identified with this theory are Max Weber and George Mead. Action depends
We watched a film and we had an activity afterwards, I was assigned to relate a certain scenario from the film to structural functionalism. That was time I panicked because I didn’t know what it means. Luckily, one of my classmates told me what was it all about and I got it fast. For me, structural functionalism is all about the vital roles of the people, institutions, and other involved in making the society better. Basically, it’s about working together to develop and improve our state. In line with that topic is Symbolic Interactionalism, which for me means giving meaning to something that is meaningless. like, we are looking at a thing and we try to analyze what it does and what it means. To put it another way, digging deeper and deeper. In short, this is to understand the behavior of an individual towards a certain situation. Also, it is synonymous to stereotyping. Moreover, conflict theory is related to these two topics above because it also deals with actions but in different terms. based on my own understanding, Conflict theory states that the society won’t be in its progressive state if conflict will not interfere. In simpler terms, society can’t always be on the positive side. There should be a negative side so that there’s equilibrium. There can’t be good if there’s no bad. What’s the basis of good if bad is not present? And
Symbolic interactionism perspective is defined as “the study of how people negotiate the meanings of social life during their interactions with others” (Rohall, Milkie, and Lucas, 2014, p.27). It asserts that “we construct meaning about things that are important in our own lives and in our society” (Rohall, Milkie, and Lucas, 2014, p.28). These meanings derive from social interactions among individuals which
On a micro level symbolic interactionism instills itself with in society when it comes to the sex of the person. By constantly seeing social rules enforced it perpetuates an imagined set by society. Men are interpreted as gentlemen by opening doors for women or paying for dinner. This interpretation of men is set as the norm according to the society. This concept of male is frequently being depicted in the media in the form of movies, novels and etc. The same thing goes for women, what if a woman wanted be a firefighter? Her coworkers would probably harass her. Society would tell her that she is going against her gender role. Society is teaching females the rules of social behavior and if you deviate from it there are consequences. All these
Sociologists view society in different ways. Sociologists use three major theories: symbolic interactionism, functional analysis, and conflict theory. The symbolic interactionist perspective, also known as symbolic interactionism, directs sociologists to consider the symbols and details of everyday life, what these symbols mean, and how people interact with each other (Cliff). Some examples of symbolic interactionism are the meaning of marriage, the meaning of divorce, the meaning of parenthood, and the meaning of love. Symbols may include wedding bands, vows of life‐long commitment, a white bridal dress, a wedding cake, a Church ceremony, and flowers and music. American society attaches general meanings to these symbols, but individuals also maintain their own perceptions of what these and other symbols mean (Cliff). Symbols have a shared social meaning that is understood by all members of society. Symbolical interactionism is analyzed at a micro-sociological level. It examines small-scale patterns of social interaction. It focuses mainly on face-to-face interaction and how people use symbols to create a social life.
There are three main types of sociological perspectives in which you can perceive different sociological issues and concepts; structural-functional, symbolic-interaction, and social conflict. Structural-functional looks at society as a whole and how it works together. Symbolic-interaction is how different symbols spark particular thoughts and emotions by examining the meanings that people impose on objects, events and behaviors. Social conflict studies how power and coercion affect social order. Based off these types of perspectives, an analysis on teen depression and suicide can be evaluated from a sociological standpoint.
The theory of symbolic interactionism grew from the understanding the mind was not a thing or structure, but was a process of thinking (Ritzer, 2000). This process comprised of three stages, which includes defining objects in the social world, outlining possible modes of conduct and seeing the consequences of alternative actions and elimination of unlikely possibilities allowing a focus on selecting the most optimal course of action (Ritzer, 2000), this process allows the “self” the ability to adjust with interactions with others. (Ritzer, 2000)
Sociologists employ three major theoretical perspectives in sociology today. They are the structural-functionalist perspective, the conflict perspective, and the symbolic interactionism. The structural-functionalist perspective is done at a macro level and its focus is on the relationships between the parts of society. The Conflict perspective is done at a macro level and its main focus is on how the wealthy controls the poor and weak. Symbolic Interactionism is done at a micro and it focuses on the use of symbols and face to face interactions.
There are three main theories of sociology; functionalism, conflict theory and symbolic interactionism. This paper will focus on two of those theories, functionalism and conflict theory. The objective is to delineate the assumptions of two out of the three theoretical perspectives and apply these assumptions to an analysis of social stratification. How this will be accomplished will be by comparing and contrasting their assumptions and by analyzing the two theories affect on social stratification. Then I will state my opinion on which of the two better fits my personal sociological views. Functionalism is many people's way to view the world sociologically. It states clearly that the objectivity of the researcher is necessary and can be accomplished. There are three main points, which make up a functionalist theory on sociological expression. The first point is that culture is made up of interacting, interdependent parts. Each of these parts has a function in maintaining the society as a system on the whole. The second point states that shared values and expectations(or beliefs) among the members of the society help hold the society together. The third point states that these systems have a need for stability and a need to try to keep all the parts working together congruously in a sort of system. Social change in this system is uncommon, and when it does happen, it is a very gradual change. Conflict theory is centered on the tension, or struggle that goes on in everyday life. There are many different parts, which make up the conflict theorist's view on the sociological perspective. The first main part is that society promotes general differences in wealth, power, and prestige. Wealth...