Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Challenges in conducting qualitative research
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research methods
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Challenges in conducting qualitative research
b. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the approach to research contained in the article. Carl Rogers was one of the pioneers of counselling research; his research team developed a quantitative questionnaire to measure process variable like empathy, unconditional positive regard and empathy (Rogers, Gendlin, Kiesler and Truax, 1967, cited in McLeod, 2010). However, in more recent times, it has been recognised that the complexity of the therapy process and the lived experiences of the client in the therapy session can be more appropriately analysed through qualitative approaches such as interviews and lived experiences of events in therapy sessions. Mick Cooper (video excerpt 20, 2016) explains how in the UK organisations like the Health Professions Council are increasingly calling for counselling and psychotherapy to be rooted in research evidence, and the existence of such evidence may have funding implications for practitioners. Qualitative research could be defined as systematic inquiry involving the …show more content…
To address the possible problems of researcher bias, Elliott, Fisher and Rennie (1999) suggested a list of “quality criteria” for qualitative research, this included “Owning one’s perspective/reflexivity” where the researcher is required to disclose personal biases that moulded their approach to the subject being studied. Elliott et al. also included in their list the need for researchers to carry out credibility checks of the categories and themes to be analysed (Elliott, Fisher and Rennie cited in McLeod, 2010). The Elliott et al. list attempts to ensure the validity and reliability of any qualitative research study findings and eliminate the notion that any study is not just a collection of the personal views of the researcher (McLeod,
Identify the hypothesis (testable question) that the study was trying to answer and describe the methods of research used in each study.
In response to the question set, I will go into detail of the study, consisting of the background, main hypotheses, as well the aims, procedure and results gathered from the study; explaining the four research methods chosen to investigate, furthering into the three methods actually tested.
Stickley, T. & Freshwater, D. (2006). “The Art of Listening to the Therapeutic Relationship” Journal of Mental health Practice. 9 (5) pp12 - 18.
Described below is a critical appraisal of a qualitative article by Lisa Booth using the frame-work suggested by Ryan, Coughlan and Cronin 2007 to establish its believability, robustness, credibility and integrity (Ryan, Coughlan & Cronin, 2007).
Next, I am going to discuss the person-centred interventions I exercised through the therapeutic process with my client in session four. Within this I am going to explore how these interventions impacted my client’s responses and how I could improve my skills in future sessions.
According to Shebib (2016) the therapeutic or helping relationship, the role of the counsellor and client has a significant impact on the desired outcome for the client. However, in relation to the two theoretical models of counselling under discussion, the therapeutic relationships differ among the client and therapist roles (Corey 2009). In Person-Centred Therapy, the relationship between client and counsellor is viewed as being the person in the environment and the client is the expert of into their environment. There is a repetition of equality amongst the client-counsellor relationship (Corey, 2009). This notion that focus to placed onto the client and not the problem ( Shebeb, 2017). The counsellor’s attitude has a significant role
Person-Centred Counselling established its origins in the late 1940 during a conference when Carl Rogers gave a talk entitled ‘New Concepts in Psychotherapy’. The summarisation of the talk resulted in the theory that the client in a counselling relationship should be at the center of the relationship and lead the counselling process. The Client, in effect became the expert on their life and/or problems. The fundamental belief is that an individual is capable of change, growth and fulfillment (self-concept). Person-Centred counselling looks at ‘the here and now’ and how to make changes that affect the future. Person-Centred Counselling generated a system known as the ‘Core Conditions Model’ which emphasized three key components: Empathy, Congruence and Acceptance.
The critique will focus on issues like, title, theoretical framework, research design, methodology, data collection, methods, data analysis, rigour, findings, ethics, generalisability and flexibility.
The articles, published after 1996, contain varied methods of research attainment, but share similarities such as being a self-survey, having a small sample size, and being
Current research implies that an empathetic clinician-client relationship and interrelated ecosystems play the majority role in the success of therapy (Kilpatrick & Holland, 2009). The clinician’s ability to be present and actively perceive what the client is experiencing is of utmost importance in creating a therapeutic alliance. It is imperative that the clinician gains positive regard towards the client and their environment displaying honest acceptance towards the client no matter what issues are presented in session. This closely relates to a sincere presentation of genuineness that instills a feeling of honesty within the client and clinician (Kilpatrick & Holland, 2009). An experienced clinician builds upon the therapeutic
Stickley,T. & Freshwater, D. (2006). “The Art of Listening to the Therapeutic Relationship” Journal of Mental health Practice. 9 (5) pp12 - 18.
Qualitative research is an approach that attempts to situate an activity that locates the observer in the world by providing the study to occur in their natural setting and by attempting to make sense of, or interpret information (Denzin and Lincoln, 2005). A characteristic of qualitative research is to use a variety of empirical materials such as personal experience, interviews, and questionnaires. It is imperative to understand the task at hand and how to fully carry out the study when using a qualitative research approach in order to find out the information needed. One view of qualitative research is it involves examining individual’s experiences and documenting those experiences in detail (Jones, 2011). By documenting these observations the researcher is ensuring validity in his or her data and giving the correct creditability to those who participated in the study.
Now within the rest of this paper you will be finding a few different things getting discussed. Staring it off we will be discussing the articles that we have found to make our arguments and hypotheses. After wrapping up the literature reviews we will be discussing the hypotheses thus continuing onto our variables and indicators. Once we discuss our hypotheses we will be moving onto the research design. The research design will have our general issues, sampling, and methods.
But human rights is a complex social concept. The quantity or intensity of violations is only one of several relevant dimensions.
Credibility improves when researchers are reflexive; as this way they make their research methods which were used to produce data and the manner of analysis that influenced research findings, more transparent and attempt to make readers of their research aware of their own potential researcher bias. Thus, the researchers should declare and not hide their biases, values, beliefs furthermore, responses to the object of study for the sake of credibility. Credibility and reliability also improves as the researcher identifies the particular status position that s/he assumes towards the subjects being studied, thus shedding some clarity on what can and cannot be observed. For instance, if the researcher is perceived as an outsider by researched participants of a culture who are being studied, then it is very likely that her/his presence won’t be welcomed. It is likewise