Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Challenge of performance management
Challenge of performance management
Challenge of performance management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Challenge of performance management
Leadership theories are ever-evolving as organizational dynamics are constantly shifting. Thoroughly examining the Distributive Leadership and Leadership-Members Exchange approaches offers the opportunity to note the positive and negative aspects of each, as well as the key concepts. Personal experience is an interesting addition to the study in its ability to demonstrate a modern-day approach to an existing dynamic. To better compliment this study, looking at a leadership application in a diverse organization is telling in viewing the effects each of these theories has on team members and ultimately organizational morale.
Distributive Leadership
Distributive Leadership is commonly seen in an education research application but can also
…show more content…
2,)Practice: Practice focuses on tasks within an organization with regard to what is important and who should be the executor.
3.)Situation:With respect to an educational setting, the situation focuses on the leader, the follower and actual routine being examined.
Strengths and Weakness of Distributive Leadership
To thoroughly examine Distributive Leadership it is important to explore the negative and positive aspects associated with the method. Looking at the strengths, the following aspects are observed:
1.) An increase in the ownership of the decision making process as more power and influence is available to followers
2.) Innovation is more present as followers are empowered and are motivated to contribute more to the organization.
3.) Followers feel more loyalty and motivation in their roles within the organization resulting in increased enthusiasm.
4.) Team work is increased as relationships are strong across the organization and between leaders and
…show more content…
Effective leaders strive to demonstrate investment in these team members and prove opportunity exists for improvement.
3.)Offer Additional Education and Training: Finally, leaders have the opportunity to offer training and education to the struggling team member in an effort to improve the relationship, trust and job performance as a result.
Strengths and Weaknesses of the Member-Exchange Theory
Looking at the Member-Exchange Theory it is interesting to note the benefits and losses to be achieved through this approach. In many ways, this method is similar to the concept of “survival of the fittest”. Motivated, hard working and loyal team members will rise to the top and those not fulfilling their obligations will be unsuccessful. It is necessary to examine the strengths of this approach as they are:
1.)Identification: This theory identifies those team members in the “in-group” and those in the “out-group”.
2.)Emphasis: The LMX Theory highlights the importance of communication with regard to relationships between leaders and his or her team
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. p. 1-19. Retrieved from http://www.blackdiamond.dk/HDO/Organisation_Gary_Yukl_Leadership_in_Organizations.pdf
Enable Others to Act – leaders actively engage individuals and make an effort to generate an ambience of trust and self-esteem.
... resolution via coaching, constructive criticism and positive actions. Additional measures may need to be taken should behavioral issues persist to include the termination of team membership and/or repercussions for non-active participation. Resolving negative issues by turning performance around can only be accomplished when team members clearly understand their role within the team and the importance of their participation. This occurs with the encouragement and support of all team members; hence team morale improves in addition to team productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness.
Northouse, P. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
The leadership is a privilege and it is such a privilege and an honor which will carry the tremendous responsibility which will inspire others to direct them to accomplish goals and vision of the organization. Leadership is about influencing the people, by producing direction, purpose and motivating in order to accomplish the mission, vision and improving the organization. The leadership philosophy is evolved based on the experiences, both positive and negative, in most of the initiatives and activities that we undertake. It is also one among the collaboration and teamwork within which the team members can utilize each other’s strengths to counter the weaknesses of the individuals. By observing, introspecting and experimenting we can developed a leadership paradigm which is inclusive, collaborative and proactive. We can develop the ability to recognize which will approach in order to reach the productive conclusion. The great leaders know their limitations and are capable at utilize their strengths and also the strengths of others to compensate.
The Leader-Member Exchange Theory, or LMX, is a two-way relationship between management/supervisors and their employees/subordinates. The theory assumes that leaders use different management styles, leadership styles, and behaviors with each individual subordinate or group of subordinates. The exchange between supervisors and subordinates will be inconsistent between each individual member of the group. A supervisor may be very kind and supportive to one employee/group and be very critical and unresponsive to another employee/group. Due to this type of interaction, the LMX theory suggests that leaders classify subordinates into two groups, the in-group members and the out-group members (Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly, & Konopaske, 2012, p. 334).
In organizations aspiring for growth and continual improvement, relationships are more intricate and alternatives more numerous than the either/or imposition implied by the notion of leaders and followers. Practically no one leads all of the time. Leaders also work as followers; all in all, “everyone uses a portion of their day following and another portion leading” (Galie and Bopst, 2006, p. 11).
Leadership is defined as the action of guiding an individual or group of people. Effective leaders shape the behavior and thought process of the individuals around them. As a result, the success of an organization is often impacted by the leadership style and approach of its leaders. Even when engaging with multiple people, impactful leaders maintain their own style of leadership but occasionally change their approach based on the motivational needs of each individual. However, regardless of the style, leadership within an organization is designed to drive the performance of their employees and it is done through proficient communication. This guidance influences the culture of an organization, which subsequently, helps to shape its leaders.
After the servant leadership theory, there is what is known as leader-member exchange (LMX). The leader-member exchange theory “suggests leaders have limited time and resources and share both their personal and positional resources differently with their employees” (Shockley-Zalabak, 2015, p.153). Additionally, the LMX theory focuses on the leader and the subordinates independently and typically the interaction differs with each person.
5) “as a cooperative method that lets in regular people to achieve extraordinary effects”. Harris & Harris (1996) additionally give an explanation for that a team has a common purpose or cause where Team individuals can expand effective, mutual relationships to gain group desires. Teamwork replies upon people working collectively in cooperative surroundings to reap common team goals via sharing knowledge and talents. The literature consistently highlights that one of the essential factors of a team is its recognition toward a collective goal and a clean motive (Fisher, Hunter, & Macrosson, 1997; Johnson & Johnson, 1995, 1999; Parker, 1990; Harris & Harris, 1996). Teams are a fundamental part of many corporations and must be integrated as a part of the transport of tertiary
The collection of ideas, knowledge, and experience of different individuals is better than that of only one person. From problem-solving to innovation, organizations have relied on the high-performances of groups and teams to set the organization apart from the rest. Having a common goal will make each team member accountable for the success and failure of the team. Since each team member is accountable to the team, each member's behavior will have an effect on the team. To belong to a team requires that each member be clear on the goals and objectives of the team-to share a common vision. (Park, 2005) By doing so, a group can become a high-performance team.
Leadership Theories and Studies. (2009). In Encyclopedia of Management. Retrieved July 20, 2011 from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G2-3273100155.html
...owers to accept the change and followers work in accordance of organizational goals. As the goals met they feel proud and more satisfied.
Many people associate leadership with a specific job title or form of power within an organization. However, through personal experience, I have concluded that leadership can come in many forms and position as well as from multiple sources of roles and job titles both with and without power. Based on the definition of leadership, anyone can be considered a leader as long as they have the ability to influence people to achieve a particular result or goal which benefits the organization or group as a whole. Individuals with a secure sense of self and understanding, acceptance of diversity within an organization tend to be the strongest leaders that not only make others want to follow, but they also encourage other leaders to gravitate to their
By allowing for employees to be increasingly engaged in workplace activities, they are then given the opportunity to develop new skills. Most leaders also encourage for employees to participate in team building activities so that any employee would be more comfortable and have stronger chemistry when working with other members of their respective departments, and with other employees in the company as a whole. Leaders are capable of motivating their subordinates through a series of actions, such as words of encouragement, acts of appreciation, and allowing for employee involvement in key decision making processes in the company. For instance, leaders who appreciate, constantly encourage and assist in the improvement of the tasks performed by their subordinates will be able to build a strong and healthy employer-employee relationship. This good relationship instils the traits of confidence in employees and motivates them to enhance their performance. Excellent leaders commonly try to develop a dialogue or establish open communication with their subordinates. Employees who are well