Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advertisement analysis of marketing
Analysis of advertising campaigns
Analysis of advertising campaigns
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advertisement analysis of marketing
Thanks,------. So far, we have got a relatively comprehensive understanding about Under Armour’s business position and strategies. You may wonder what other strategic actions it can take to complement and strengthen its competitive approach and maximize the power of its overall strategy.
The first one is offensive and blue ocean strategy. Under Armour is very special, because it focus on the team concept, essentially they develop technology that could be used by the entire team to increase productivity. Their gear is perceived to be the best in the market in helping teammates shed unwanted heat and cold.
Its marketing executive Adrienne Lofton said: The brand considers itself an "underdog brand." We work with athletes who most people wouldn't
…show more content…
Under Armour’s first basketball shoe, the Curry One, with growth rate up to 740%, likely helped by the success of NBA(National Basketball Association) MVP(Most valuable player) Stephen Curry.
With fitness apps and wearable technology, Under Armour has direct access to much richer, more intimate data, with customers logging 8bn foods and 2bn activities on its apps over the past year.
Under Armour embarked upon a robust advertising campaign geared toward female athletes. The 'What's Beautiful' campaign has been backed by individual Under Armour stores that have been redesigned specifically with women in mind.
Misty Copeland, who recently became the first black woman to be named principal ballerina at the prestigious American Ballet Theater, drove an increase in sales of women's apparel. Copeland is a large force behind the "I will what I want,"campaign, which seeks to empower female consumers.
Under Armour’s competitors also made many attempt in offensive strategies. Lululemon promoting an ethic of self-betterment through exercise, positive thinking and clothes that tread the fine line between wholesome-casual and
…show more content…
There is a story happened at the 2014 Winter Olympics, when American speedskaters, which have always performed well, got poor grades with Under Armour’s brand new scientifically advanced Mach 39 speedskating suits. To defense the wrong perception, Under Armour put CEO Kevin Plank and exec VP-global marketing Matt Mirchin, front and center, vigorously defending the suit in multiple TV and print interviews.
Enlisted other UA endorsers to defend their sponsors' technology on social media without directly mentioning the speedskating controversy.
Adidas and Nike also have many defensive wars. When Adidas announced that it had hired three Nike’s senior designers, Nike filed a $10 million lawsuit accusing them of violating the non-compete agreements they had signed and taking proprietary secrets.
Once Nike was trying to sign the German national team—an Adidas team since 1954, Adidas' determined to retain its role as the world's largest soccer brand, and doubling sponsorship of the team to 20 million euros ($25.7 million) per year, sponsored the entire event and a third of the teams at the World Cup
Overall, Under Armor did an outstanding job targeting young, aspiring athletes to do what they want to do with their life. They used logic to show how hard the athletes work along with emotion to show how serious they take their training. Finally, Under Armor used the credibility of the athletes to sell their new training shoe. This commercial will make anyone want to purchase a pair of shoes and workout themselves. Since the commercial is on such a serious level, viewers emotionally connect with it which makes Under Armor seem like the best brand
Under Armour’s product is swim gear. They sell their product by doing what Adidas did, used motivation, emotion, and a message to connect with the audience. But, Under Armour used a famous celebrity named Michael Phelps. The audience starts to pay attention to the ad and either feels connected or wants to be a better athlete like Phelps. Under Armour finally manipulated their audience into buying their
Lululemon’s competitive strategy is broad differentiation due to the company expanding its target market and product line. Although Lululemon was initially established to satisfy the apparel needs of adult women who practice yoga, the company has widened its definition to
1.How strong are the competitive forces confronting Under Armour, Nike, and The Adidas Group? Do a five-forces analysis to support your answer. The Under Armour brand has seen a huge surge in popularity and recognition in recent years. This is a company that has been on a fast track: founded in 1996, it went public in 2005 and has been growing at 20% per year since.
Strengths. Through the innovation of high tech undergarments for athletes who compete in various climates, Under Armour is the leader in the industry. The innovation has created a high quality apparel with brand loyalty. The fabric is moisture-wicking geared to high demand of a target market. The ability of
The reason consumers select Under Armour is because the brand is innovative. They’re constantly creating new products. Under Armour is the originator of performance apparel. That is what attracted their first customers, their present customer, and future customers. Add that with their marketing, and that is what helps make the company what it is today.
Founded in 1996 by University of Maryland graduate Kevin Plank, Under Armour has become the leading supplier of the athletic performance apparel industry. Under Armour began with simple idea to create a t-shirt that would enhance athletic performance by regulating body temperature and removing perspiration without absorbing it. Under Armour was based out of Plank's grandmother's basement in D.C. until he moved the headquarters to, and built a manufacturing plant in, South Baltimore.
The Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association has projected that revenues from athletic footwear will grow at a rate of 5.1% (Wheelen, Hunger, Hoffman, & Bamford, 2015, 2012, 2010). Under Armour should target at least this 5% growth rate in its footwear segment
Kevin Plank changed how athletes dressed forever. He came up with an idea to help keep athletes cool and dry. This industry started out from Kevin’s grandmother’s basement in Washington DC. By the end of 1998, Under Amour opened up their own new headquarters and warehouse in Baltimore. Under Armour is an industry that gives employees 48 hours a week of work and 12 hours for overtime work. Under Armour doesn’t do any business with companies that have forced labor and any company that use children that are younger than 15 years of age. Under Armour produces products for all the right reasons and to help the consumer. They focus on helping athletics improve their general performance in the certain sport. Under Armour is the chosen brand for many athletes of this
Under Amour Company ventured into a market segment that was overcrowded, it had thousands of companies that competed against each other. Out of the many companies involved in the trade, the two most formidable threats seemed to be orchestrated by Nike and Adidas. These are two giant sports apparel and footwear, which pride themselves as having been long term veterans in the industry. Nike in particular was christened as the ultimate shoe and athletic apparel company with revenues of $18.6 billion, net income of $1.9 billion and more than thirty two thousand employees globally in the year 2008. This makes it the largest athletic shoe and apparel seller in the world. This company has seen major expansions in outlets throughout the world over the years. Adidas on its part has managed to build a powerful brand through its technological innovations and aggressive marketing where they spend up to thirteen per cent of their revenue besides offering high quality services. These scenarios seem to present Under Armour with a massive competitive disadvantage.
The sports apparel and accessories industry has a highly competitive market. Businesses are constantly competing for elite athletes to sponsor, raw materials, and every opportunity to expand. Under Armour is able to not only survive but thrive in this market because of their ability to think outside of the box. They are constantly creating new and exciting products that help athletes everywhere.
There are as many brands as there is ants in the world, but the two brands that pop out are adidas and nike. Those two brands have been going head to head for ages to see who is the better brand. It’s been tested, compared, and debated which brand is better. Whether it’s the quality of the materials or the cost of it, the debate is ongoing. Both brands have been fighting for the top ever since they were both created and I don’t blame them it’d be fantastic to be the best brand in the world. When Nike and adidas are contrasted, it becomes clear that the Adidas brand are better for the overall consumer and enhances sport performance than Nike.
From their marketing strategies to their selling philosophies, Nike has developed one of the most recognizable and demanded name and logo tandems ever created.
They attempt to choose athletes who they want to reflect their brand, they are achievers, winner, determined and accomplishment orientated, which is what they also encourage their consumer to be. Another important source for brand equity from Nike is the high perceived quality of their products not only by athletes but the public as well. Although most consumers won’t be using their Nike products for high level athletic performance, Nike products are always designed to be able to be used with that
Nike recruits brand ambassadors from different parts of the world who top in athletes and who are having a good following in the public, which helps them to reach the audience that influences them to purchase the Nike sportswear. (MichaelSam85, 2011)