Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The task of strategic management
Trace and critically examine the historical management of strategic management. essay
The task of strategic management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The task of strategic management
Strategic management is a youthful discipline which originated in the 1950’s and 1960’s.This essay tracks the historical development of strategic management as a business discipline. From Scientific Management to Hypercompetition, the emergence of the strategic management can be tracked by the contribution of the influential scholars like Alfred Chandler, Ansoff, Michael Porter, Mintzberg and Richard D' Aveni. Although there were numerous scholars who played a role in the evolution of strategic management, but for the purpose of this essay, only above mentioned scholar’s contributions are presented. According to Rao (2008), the word strategy comes from the Greek word strategeia, which means the art or science of being a General. Successful …show more content…
The scientific management model proposed by Taylor was developed to meet the needs that were constant in the typical work place in the late 19th century. Management decisions were often illogical and the productivity was significantly low characterized because of the low morale of the employees. The management did not use to pay any attention to the issues of the employees. In his book, He states that, in scientific management, the core objective of management and the company is ‘to secure the maximum prosperity for the employer and the employee’. On this base, he introduced four fundamental principles of scientific management. (Chyung, 2005) described Taylor’s principles of Scientific Management …show more content…
These four principles became the basic guidelines for managing the work of individuals. Taylor's principles of scientific management revolutionized the manufacturing industry which led to increases in productivity.
Emergence of strategy Fifty years later, the term strategy evolved. The term was derived from the Greek word strategies meaning "art of the general". Prior to 1950’s, the various functions of management were separate with little overall coordination or strategy. After the World War II the idea emerged that strategic planning and implementation form a separate management process, which is now known as “Strategic management”. This wide ranging approach to developing strategy evolved over time (Rao, 2008).
Chandler’s contributions
Chandler is the first scholar who argued that strategic management is a separate discipline. Chandler described strategy as: “Determination of the long term goals and objectives of a company, the adoption of the courses of action and allocation of the resources necessary to achieve these goals” (Chandler,
The major change came through the work of Fredrick Winslow Taylor and his theory of scientific management system. It was not that Taylor was unique or completely new; only time and motion study could be put in that category. The trend was already moving towards systematic management such as formal management methods or by cost ...
Fordism and Scientific Management are terms used to describe management that had application to practical situations with extremely dramatic effects. Fordism takes its name from the mass production units of Henry Ford, and is identified by an involved technical division of labour within companies and their production units. Other characteristics of Fordism include strong hierarchical control, with workers in a production line often restricted to the one single task, usually specialised and unskilled. Scientific management, on the other hand, "originated" through Fredrick Winslow Taylor in 1911, and in very basic terms described the one best way work could be done and that the best way to improve output was to improve the techniques or methods used by the workers. (Robbins p.38)
This is similar to Fredrick Taylor’s theory of scientific management. This was an oldest form of management theory which focuses on efficiency and labor productivity. It is characterized by a chain of commands, span of control, specialization and the use of vertical levels of
Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol are both considered classical contributors to management theory. Both were developing and expression their viewpoints at similar time period with the aim of “raising standard of management in industry” (Brodie,1967, p7) in a period were very few publications and theories on management. While both theories were developed with the same influencing factors such as war, social struggles and industrial revolution (Urwick. 1951, p7) each developed quite different management theories. Frederick Taylor is considered the Father of Scientific management and he developed scientific principles of management, focusing on the individual,...
Today’s era of business world adapts to everything new but these modern concepts are an indirect tribute to the theories produced by Taylor, Fayol, Mayo and Weber. Taylor’s Scientific management theory is one such example which has become such an important aspects of modern management that it feels unbelievable that his concepts were a part of the history. It is falsely assumed that as the society progresses, the older theories tend to lose their importance. The thing to be noted here is that these theories are based on basic human needs which do not change with time; the thing that changes is the method to fulfil those needs. Investigating earlier management theories is important because these theories are less complex and provide immediate solution to the problems. These theories basically help us to go to the root of the problem and understand its complexity. The better understanding we have about the problem, the easier it is to accomplish the objectives of the company. The following essay states the importance of the Taylor’s Scientific management theory and how it is implemented even today in the business world.
In his paper The Principles of Scientific Management published in 1911, Frederick Winslow Taylor proposes an alternative system of management designed to promote efficiency. Within his opening argument, Taylor describes the ideal relationship between the employee and employer: Scientific management has for its very foundation the firm conviction that the true interests of the employees and employers are one and the same; that prosperity for the employer cannot exist through a long term of years unless it is accompanied by prosperity for the employee, and vice versa. (Taylor, 1-2) Taylor then details sources of inefficiency before describing “personal cooperation” as the condition which will “enable the employee to do his work better
There are several theories that examine an organization and it’s approach to managing work in an effort to develop efficiency and increase production. Two classical approaches to management are Taylor’s scientific management theory and Weber's bureaucratic management theory. Both men are considered pioneers of in the study of management.
The concept of scientific management is based on the idea that work could be studied to increase efficiency, and specialization. Economist Adam Smith changed the way the world looked at the economy and organization. In his essay, “Of the Division of Labour,” Smith emphasizes the importance of specialization, and how division of labor leads to specialization. He states that this would allow a worker to be more productive and efficient (Shafritz, Ott, & Jang, 2011, p. 41-45). Frederick Taylor introduced the principles of scientific management, which stated that management is a science, workers should be scientifically selected and trained scientifically, and both management and workers should work together.
the study of time and action; b) the management on assignment; c) the theory of organization. (8)Taylor’s theory created a revolution in the subject of management because it was the first scientific method in field of management science. (1)After that, management became a truly scientific knowledge and it expanded and modified by later generations. Therefore, Taylor is “known as the father of scientific management”. (2) Taylor put forward a perspective which was “study the character, the nature and the performance of each workman” and moreover, to “train and help and teach this workman”. (3) In the following paragraphs, will exploring the relevant and irrelevant hypotaxis between Scientific Management and organizations.
Frederick Taylor thought that changes in the work process and/or rules would advance efficiency and productivity. He originated the scientific management approach in public administration. It was based on the idea that work processes should be observed via experiments which would greatly improve productivity. It would do so by doing away with the rule of thumb work methods and replacing them with the results of actual timed observations (14). The application of the scientific approach to management methods would lead to optimizing task time by simplifying the job. It would mean observing work processes to find the one best way to perform each job (15). Once the best way was discovered, all employees were to use it. The simplification of the job would improve task time. This method would lead to increased productivity, higher wag...
Scientific Management theory arose from the need to increase productivity in the U.S.A. especially, where skilled labor was in short supply at the beginning of the twentieth century. The only way to expand productivity was to raise the efficiency of workers.
A strategy, according to Robbins and Barnwell (2002, p. 139) is “the adoption of courses of action and the allocation of resources necessary to achieve the organisation’s goals”.
Scientific management can be defined from a broad sense as the endeavors made in order to come up with suitable systems in the sector of industrial production and organization. In a narrower sense, it refers to the specific principles that were championed by Fredrick Taylor who was an engineer before the First World War. Taylor focused on ways of increasing productivity and reducing waste that resulted from management controlling the labor process. It is important to realize maximum output from every individual or machine and it is only through embracing scientific management that these problems could be solved. The central way that Taylor proposed of achieving these goals was task idea which was regarded as the single most important concept in scientific management. Task idea held that the tasks of every worker were to be planned out and the workers given clear instructions with details of the work they were supposed to do and ways of doing it.
The evolution of management though the decades can be divided into two major sections. One of the sections is the classical approach. Under the classical approach efficiency and productivity became a critical concern of the managers at the turn of the 20th century. One of the approaches from the classical time period were systematic management which placed more emphasis on internal operations because managers were concerned with meeting the growth in demand brought on by the Industrial revolution. As a result managers became more concerned with physical things than towards the people therefore systematic management failed to lead to production efficiency. This became apparent to an engineer named Frederick Taylor who was the father of Scientific Management. Scientific Management was identified by four principles for which management should develop the best way to do a job, determine the optimum work pace, train people to do the job properly, and reward successful performance by using an incentive pay system. Scientifi...
This essay will discuss the relevance of Taylor’s Principles of Scientific Management to organisations today. Taylor’s theory of Scientific Management is based around how efficiently a member of staff works in order to improve their productivity, the theory was introduced in 1911 and has four principles which were tested to determine optimal work methods, and are still seen in organisations today such as fast-food restaurants. Taylor believed that workers left to their own devices would restrict their output and not progress with the task, this was called ‘soldiering’ and it was described in two forms; natural