Stormwater Management Case Study

800 Words2 Pages

The theme of these two papers is water management, and each presents different aspects of this issue. The paper by Fratini, Elle, Jensen, and Mikkelsen (2012), presents a case for developing a new system to implement sustainable technology to combat climate change. This system includes examining macro knowledge first through understanding institutions, secondly understanding the meso level of knowledge by interpreting networks, and finally understanding the micro level of individual opinions. This theory was mainly formed through reviewing current literature and doing filed work in Denmark and Norway. The second paper by Barbosa, Fernandes, and David (2012), mainly focuses on the complexities of stormwater management and presents various solutions …show more content…

This complements the findings of the other paper, as it too advocated for a multifaceted approach to stormwater policy. Both sets of authors believe that there is a need for integration of not only science and policy making, but also different fields that contribute to stormwater management (Barbosa, Fernandes, & David, 2012). The articles have a common element as neither specifically focuses on a particular case study, allowing them to make conclusions drawn from many examples. This aids in making theories more applicable to many different situations. The articles differ in the theories that they present, as Barbosa, Fernandes, and David indicate that stormwater management should be through different water treatment strategies, whereas Fratini et al uses the approach of creating a system based on incorporating various levels of opinion on how stormwater should be managed. Both of these approaches have strengths and weakness, which will be assessed in the following sections. The assumptions made by Barbosa, Fernandes, and David are not about how the system should work, unlike Fratini et al, rather it speaks to how it currently works. In this analysis, however, Barbosa, Fernandes, and David do not acknowledge the role of public participation in stormwater planning. While it does show …show more content…

The theoretical framework that they present aims to address this issue by incorporating various levels of knowledge that they refer to as macro, meso and micro (Fratini et al, 2012). On the surface, this system appears to be able incorporate the knowledge of man parties by ensuring that they will have a chance to voice opinions at a particular level of idea development (Fratini et al, 2012). However, by using an ordered system where the macro level is understood first and then the micro level last, it appears to make the macro level the most important. Additionally, using this system may only work well if officials could be truly objective. If there is ever conflicting opinions on stormwater best practices management, the officials who are implementing this system may be more inclined to agree with discoveries produced by macro analysis since these analyses may be what the researchers were led to initially believe. A different problem with this approach is that it relies on officials or researchers to both produce a large amount of data and then analyses it to determine the optimal solution (Fratini et al, 2012). This is reminiscent of the rational systems theory, which too assumes that officials, in that case

Open Document