Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Environment regulations consequences
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Environment regulations consequences
Introduction
Walkerton a small town in Ontario was brought into the spotlight for all the wrong reasons. When a major rain storm caused E. coli from manure to seep into the towns drinking water contaminating it. This disaster happened because Walkerton has had a dark past with not following proper rules and regulations. However, the Walkerton Clean Water Centre (WCWC) makes the future look bright. The future looks bright because the Ontario government learned from its wrongs of the past. By firstly, how the Walkerton Public Utilities Commission (PUC) managed the drinking water systems prior to the 2000 E. coli outbreak. Secondly, how the E. coli outbreak happened and how it effected drinking water regulations across Ontario. Finally,
…show more content…
coli outbreak and how it changed drinking water regulations. At the turn of the century, things were about to get very bad for the Walkerton PUC. In May of 2000, one night heavy rains caused a runoff from a field that was filled with cow manure. The manure seeped into Well 5 contaminating the well with E. coli. Well 5 was Walkerton’s major drinking well that was in use at the time. Stan Koebel was the boss of PUC during the May 2000 outbreak of E coli. “Koebel received reports about unsafe levels of E coli on May 17, 2000” (The Sun Times 2010). He ignores them, does not report his findings to the Ministry of the Environment like what is required. By May 20, people were becoming very sick and were going to the hospital to find out they have an E. coli bacterial disease. Officials phoned Koebel but he does not release any information about the contamination. On May 21, a boiling water advisory is put into effect. May 22, Stan Koebel finally releases his reports about the well being contaminated with E coli 5 days after it was confirmed. By July 25, 2000 seven people have died and an additional 3000 people became ill, all because of Koebel’s decision to conceal information. With the Walkerton crisis happening it, “cost at least $64.5 million and an estimated $155 million” (CBC 2004). The crisis also led to new guidelines for water treatment and updating water treatment infrastructure, so that a Walkerton tragedy would never happen again. With the Walkerton E …show more content…
After the E coli outbreak, Koebel was sentenced to only one year in prison. PUC lost control of Walkerton’s drinking water and the Ontario government constructed a brand-new state of the art water treatment facility in Walkerton. The facility cost the government of Ontario around 10 million dollars to construct. The construction of the new facility was completed in 2004. The new building is run by elected water treatment officials, who have Ph. D’s and a vast knowledge of water treatment. The Walkerton Clean Water Centre is a modern-day monument on how water treatment facilities should be run. In June of 2010, the Walkerton Clean Water Centre was honoured by the news of, “ moving into a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Gold building” (Corporate Knights 2010). For the past 12 years, it has been training Ontario water technicians in the field of proper water management. It has had very successful 12 years and an even brighter looking future, with the high standards the facility holds. It has no problems but because of Walkerton’s bad past, it is still thought of as a bad place. Which today is the complete opposite it has the best drinking water facility in all of Ontario. The Ontario Government pays 5 million dollars each year to the Walkerton Clean water facility so it can educate the new water
These include wasted trips to and from the cleaners, costing them $15,000 per year, broken and chipped bottles, costing them $1,000 per year, and the contract cleaner’s unsatisfactory quality control. These reasons have all caused Creemore Spring’s management to consider cleaning bottles in-house. No immediate action needs to be taken by Creemore Springs to improve the bottling process but, in the long-run, dependent on the municipal sewer system pricing, cleaning in-house will save Creemore Springs lots of money and likely improve the bottle cleaning
ABSTRACT: Water samples from local ponds and lakes and snow runoff were collected and tested for coliform as well as Escherichia coli. Humans as well as animals come into contact with these areas, some are used for recreational activities such as swimming and some are a source of drinking water for both animals and humans The main goal of this experiment was to see which lakes, snow run off and ponds tested positive for coliform or Escherichia coli and to come up with some reasoning as to why. It was found that the more remote pond with less contact contained the most Escherichia coli. However, another lake that many swim in and use as their drinking water indeed tested positive for a small amount of Escherichia coli. The two samples from the snow showed negative results for both coliform and Escherichia coli and the two more public ponds that aren’t as commonly used as a source of human drinking water but animal drinking water tested in the higher range for coliforms but in the little to no Escherichia coli range. It was concluded that the remote pond should be avoided as it’s not a safe source of drinking water for humans or animals. Other than that, the the other ponds are likely to be safe from Escherichia coli, but coliforms are a risk factor.
First off, as a corporation handling a towns water systems, it is the duty of the individuals within the company to take care of the water in a responsible
There is also daily tasks of people trying washing fruits and vegetables. And not even being able to wash their hands. A quote from the michigan government says, “No one in Michigan or America should live that way in the 21st Century. But these generations of women, and so many more like them, do not trust the water coming out of their pipes.”(Interim Report). Many people is Flint have no trust in their government. They believe it’s all the governments fault because of this and it is. The people have to live a life of being scared of drinking their water, showering, and even washing their hands. No American in the United States should feel like this about their water system at all. For the people in Flint who have to look at brownish, stinky, funny-tasting water is just unacceptable and we need to make a change on this even though it has been out of hand for 3 years.
Texas, with its abundances of natural resources, is facing a new demon, one that doesn’t even seem possible, a shortage of water. Water, without it nothing can survive. Texas is the second largest state for landmass in the nation and ninth for water square miles. Within the borders of Texas are more than 100 lakes, 14 major rivers, and 23 aquifers, so why has water become such an important issue for the state? Politicians and conservationists all agree that without a new working water plan, the state could be facing one of the most damaging environmental disasters they have ever seen. The issues that shape the states positions are population growth, current drought conditions, and who actually owns the water.
The water crisis in Flint Michigan began as early as was as April of 2014. The crisis is concerning a small town called Flint, located at the bottom right of michigan were the majority of the population is African American. The issue began when the town 's water supply witch in past use to come from the detroit river water supply was switched over to the Flint river water supply. People soon began to complain about the taste, smell, and color of the tap water, and of symptoms such as hair loss and rashes from bathing in the water. Even though there were many signs that the water was indeed contaminated, such as when a General Motors plant in Flint stopped using municipal water in October of 2014, claiming that it corroded car parts, the government officials stated that the water was not a threat to the public 's health and safety. However it was later revealed that the water was in fact unhealthy, and contained too much lead. The issue was brought to the eyes of the public when Lee Anne Walters, a Flint resident. This mother of four had seen her family suffer from various alarming symptoms, including abdominal pains, hair loss, and rashes; she also has a son who showed signs of developmental problems. She decided to switch her family to bottled water, and the symptoms abated. Finally, in February of 2015, she demanded that the city test the tap water. A federal investigation was launched and the results came back shocking. The water was extremely toxic containing 400 parts per billion of lead. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), there is no safe level of lead in drinking water, but the maximum allowed by law is 15 parts per billion. Virginia Tech professor and engineer Marc Edwards, an expert on municipal w...
In 1972, R.I.S.E, a terrorist group was found to be guilty for contaminating Chicago’s water supply. The alleged plot to poison water was led by Steve Pera and Allan Schwander. The then commissioner of the Chicago’s water and sewage commission regarded the attack as a scheme of harebrained people and could not have worked. Typhoid germs were introduced to the drinking water supply by two college students, Pera and Schwander. However, the commissioner said that any plan to contaminate water will fail because of the chlorine being continuously pumped to water supplies every day. With that, Typhoid bacteria won’t be able to survive the said procedure. Apart from Chlorine, the water filtration plants are guarded 24/7 so plans of any attack won’t be feasible. The two students were held in Cook County Jail and had a bond of $250,000 each. Pera and Schwander were 18 and 19 years old, respectively, during the said attack. According to investigations, RISE, the terrorist group formed by the two suspects, were created to create the basis of the newly formed master race. The bacterial culture was prepared by Pera in Mayfair City College’s laboratory where deadly microorganisms are abundant. In fact, Pera used to work as a volunteer in St. Lukes Hospital but was terminated because of his attempt to acquire unauthorized chemicals (The Ledger, 1972).
The Chesapeake Bay is polluted with agricultural waste. We see things like 1.5 billion pounds of chicken waste that no one wants to take responsibility for. Ignoring standards, a waterway was tested for E. coli; the standard is 125 FCU/100ml of water. Yet this waterway’s level was at 48392 FCU/100ml. An industry that will go to great lengths to make sure that Congress doesn’t impose sanction against them.
Nestlé Company based in Switzerland is the largest food company in the world and makes 1.8 million USD per day just from selling bottled water, non sparkling bottled water being its most profitable commodity. Nestlé has plants of bottled water across the United States and around the world. Nestlé controls one-third of the US market and sells water under 70 different brands across the world. Some popular ones are- Deer Park, Nestlé Pure Life, Ozarka, Ice Mountain and Poland Spring.
According to the “Competition in the Bottled Water Industry in 2006 Case,” bottled water industry became the one of the world’s most attractive beverage categories, as more and more people began to focus on health and fitness. Consumers start realizing the need of proper hydration, and they began purchasing bottled water instead of drinking tap water, because they were worried about safety of tap water, which tasted like chemicals. Actually, tap water contained chemicals, such as chlorine and fluoride, which are harmful for human body; however, this problem was solved when the bottled water was brought to the market. Due to bottled water’s convenience, purity, and portability, and safety, bottled water industry began to rise rapidly. During
The small Cornish town of Camelford, in the South Western part of England finds itself being commonly referred to as the centre of Britain most serious water pollution incident due to a water contamination event, which took place on 6th July 1988. This report aims to apply the framework of Environmental Health to analyse the environmental health issues and the need for an interdisciplinary approach. Furthermore, it will also explain the principles of environmental health and sustainable development associated with this incident.
Natural Resources Defense Council (2003). Study Finds Safety of Drinking Water in U.S. Cities at Risk. NRDC reports.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). Developing risk communication plans for drinking water contamination incidents. Retrieved from http://water.epa.gov/infrastructure/watersecurity/lawsregs/upload/epa817f13003.pdf
Freshwater in the world makes up only a small portion of water on the planet. While the percentage of water in the world is nearly 70%, only 2.5% is consumable. Even further, only <1% is easily accessible to basic human needs. According to National Geographic, “by 2025, an estimated 1.8 billion people will live in areas plagued by water scarcity, with two-thirds of the world's population living in water-stressed regions as a result of use, growth, and climate change.” With this current trend, water will become more immersed in environmental, economic, political, and social changes. Many of these in later years shall need to be addressed as tension rises:
There is a global shortage of drinking water. A person might wonder how this can be if seventy percent of the earth’s surface is covered by water. Most of the Earth’s water is unsuitable for human consuption. Ocean water is salt water, which makes up 97.5% of all water on the planet. Freshwater is only 3.5% of all the water on Earth. Drinking water is sourced from bodies of freshwater.