Steve Sexton's The Inefficiency Of Local Food

585 Words2 Pages

Although local food may be considered “healthier” it does not solve all of our food problems due to lack in quantity, economic depression, and time. People need to remember all of these factors when thinking of todays thriving country.
(1) Today, in common culture, people expect their food right when they want it. Food takes time. It takes time to grow, in a paper by Steve Sexton called “The Inefficiency of Local Food” he claims that Idaho produces 30 percent of the countries potatoes. These potatoes take time to grow. They cannot just be magically grown. They need water, sunlight, and rich soil. People tend to forget this when thinking about their favorite foods. All they can think of is devouring these delectable foods. These foods also …show more content…

You are required to pay for everything yourself, such as paying for the seeds to plant, paying for the fertilizer, and paying for the water to help the plants grow. Thats just for plants there are many more responsibilities that come with animals. Mass production is cheaper for the economy “Today’s high crop yields and low costs reflect gains from specialization and trade, as well as scale and scope economies…” this is stated by Steve Sexton in “The Inefficiency of Local Food”. The prices of food would skyrocket if Locavorism was implemented indefinitely everywhere. This could cause an economic depression. Many people believe that eating local food would be a positive for their local economy, however that has been shown differently in a recent research paper by Elaine De Azevedo called “Food Activism: The Locavorism Perspective” “The slogan "local food, local money" espoused by Halweil, which argues that Locavorism generates wealth and local jobs, is another (controversial) economic issue that informs the movement”. Not only would prices go up indefinitely from locavorism but there would also wouldn't be enough food to go

More about Steve Sexton's The Inefficiency Of Local Food

Open Document