Starlink Argumentative Essay

944 Words2 Pages

A farmer picks a tomato that he was sponsored to grow and review; the tomato is larger and grew faster than his normal seeds. A senior citizen picks up a can of soybeans off of the shelf that claims to have 15% more nutrients than that of the same soybeans from when he was a kid. In labs all around the world, animals and crops are being genetically modified to grow faster, larger, tastier, and stay fresh longer. A genetically modified organism is an organism whose genome has been altered by the techniques of genetic engineering so that its DNA contains one or more genes than normal (Dictionary.com). What do these changes to the DNA of crops mean for the safety of the consumer? Any crop that is modified on the genetic level in such a way that …show more content…

Starlink, a genetically modified corn that is approved for use in animal feed but not for human consumption, made its way into human foods last year. The government reported last week that Starlink did not cause allergic reactions in people who reported health problems after eating it.” (ABC News) Even if this particular GMO, which was not approved for consumption by humans, did not cause allergic reactions, there is no evidence that it is not directly related to the other health problems the consumer experienced. This is only one example where the government has disputed against any GMO involvement with allergic reactions. Although, how can the government deny such a connection when between the years 1997 to 2007, reported food allergies increased by 18 percent among children under the age of 18 (Ko). Coincidentally this was the same time period that there was a rise in the use of GM crops worldwide. The government should have nothing to hide from their citizens. We live in democracy, not a communist state. We have a natural right as human beings to know what foods in our local stores pose a threat to our health as an individual. This does not mean that GM foods as a whole are unhealthy for the consumer, but regardless, they should be labeled as what they …show more content…

Many food companies refrain from labeling because consumers have expressed distaste for GM products and state that they would not buy such products, even if they are already buying them now, unlabeled (ABC News). This opinion puts producers in a bind because by giving the consumer what they want, the company could lose profit. This is not a valid reason to forgo labeling; instead companies should make the buyer feel safe buying a GM product that IS labeled. Also, scientists along with the FDA publicize that labeling is not necessary because there is no evidence of genetic engineering changing food’s quality, safety, “or any other attribute.” (ABC News) Yet cigarettes and other tobacco products have been identified as containing tobacco even before any research had been done on the health

Open Document