Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Personal reflection on education
Theoretical perspectives of education
Personal reflection on education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Personal reflection on education
Standardized Testing
Scholar Bill Ayers believes standardized testing in schools does not accurately measure what is necessary to be successful in life. Ayers insists that Standardized tests such as the American College Test (ACT) and the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) measure specific facts and function which are among the least interesting and slightest important information that children should know. In an article titled “Testing the Right Way for Talent”, written by Hugh Price, argues the fact that standardized tests fail to capture the qualities that are necessary to be successful in the business world. Another article labeled “Implementing NCLB Assessment and Accountability Requirements in an Imperfect World” composed by Stuart Kahl, is in agreement with both Price and Ayers. According to Bill Ayers, Hugh Price and Stuart Kahl, standardized tests are uncalled excuse for a traumatic and stressful time in a child’s life.
Hugh Price and Stuart Kahl are among the large majority of people who do not believe one test is able to accurately measure what a child knows. Price states, “High-stakes standardized tests, like the Scholastic Aptitude Test, the SAT, fail to capture the qualities most essential for success in the corporate world, such as creativity, drive and leadership” (Price). Price claims that although these tests are able to rate children in topics such as Math, English and History, what really makes one who they are is more than book smarts, but their personality and leadership skills are also necessary. In addition to Price believing this fact, Kahl also articulates against standardized testing.
In his article that analyzes The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Kahl is aware of the fact that ...
... middle of paper ...
...ort and a motivation behind the tests may as well perform better than those who are not.
Whatever the reason may be, many people, including Price, Kahl, and Ayers do not support standardized testing. These authors all have one opinion in common; they are all against testing for the sake of the children, because of the pressures kids already endure without the pressures of testing. They all claim that tests may be an unfair way to rank children in the world today due to: teachers not teaching children the right material in preparation for the test, family upbringing, and even worrying the children would affect the test results. As Ayers indicates, one single test could not determine where a child stands in the business world, due to the fact that the test analyzes specific topics on school and nothing about their personality or more personal traits.
She explains how standardized tests, such as the one her students took, were designed with numerous interference techniques, included questions which were above-grade material, and were administered with inadequate time to answer the questions being presented. Stahlman goes on to express her frustration with a standardized test which was administered to her students by saying "I watched in horror as my precious students, who were gifted poets and writers, inquisitive scientists and mathematicians, lovers of books, remarkable artists, and caring learners, were forced to silently attempt to master a test that was designed to trip them up." (Stahlman 242) The author also states how these standardized tests seem to be high-stakes in nature due to schools being labeled and ranked according to their scores and teachers being rewarded due to their students achievement in these tests. This article serves as one of my stronger arguments for my case compared to my other sources, due to its exemplification of how the proliferation of such tests is alarming and how the standardized testing of students at such a young age is not appropriate due to their cognitive development. The article is also useful in the sense that is provides a valid and sound argument for the opposition of standardized testing. I will be implementing this source into my argumentative essay by providing examples from Stahlman's text on how bizarre standardized testing might seem when it comes to the assessment of students, especially at such a young age. It will also serve as a good source for proving how much of a bearing standardized tests hold on the assessment of not only students but teachers as
William then gathered an army to protect his estate. He launched a series of wars against rival barons, which lasted over a decade. He also joined King Henry I and defeated an alliance of Normans who had opposed his rule. “He was always ready ...
Even with material being taught incessantly, standardized tests can not accurately measure a student’s ability. The tests are “single-target—meaning that every student, no matter what level of achievement or ability, course selection, or cu...
In the summer of 1066 William was ready for an invasion; he had mobilized a massive army that included foot soldiers and nobles from all over Northern France. Along with the impressive land force, was a naval fleet consisting of almost 1,000 warships. After months of preparation, William landed his army on September 25th in southern England. The Normans went virtually unopposed for nearly two weeks until October 14th, when Harold and his army confronted the invaders at Hastings, near the Sussex coast of England. With an estimated 12,000 Normans and 13,000 English soldiers readied for the conflict and within sight of each other, the battle began.
Raging to be king, William would do whatever it took to be the King of England. William would go into war and kill other men to have the superior power. William’s army killed Harold, William’s enemy, so that he would be king. After Harold was dead, this left the throne wide open for William. By the end of his life, William had conquered the thing he wanted most, to be king.
Standardized tests have been used to see how much a child has learned over a certain period of time. These tests have been a highly debated issue with many parents and just people in general. In the article “Opting out of standardized tests? Wrong answer,” the author Michelle Rhee argues that people should not be trying to opt out of standardized tests because it allows the country to see how much a child has learned and the things they need to improve. On the other hand, in the article “Everything You’ve Heard About Failing Schools Is Wrong,” the author Kristina Rizga argues that standardized tests are not an efficient way to measure a student’s intelligence.
Nemoto et al (2007) compared the effect of continuous walking at moderate intensity (50% of peak aerobic capacity) and interval walking at high intensity (70% of peak aerobic capacity) on reducing blood pressure. They found that blood pressure reduction was greater in the group who walked at high intensity: 9 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and 5 mmHg for diastolic.
Standardized testing is an unfair and inaccurate form of judging a person’s intellect. In many cases, people are either over- or underrepresented by their test scores, partly because America does not currently have the capabilities of fairly scoring the increasing number of tests. Additionally, many students today are not native English speakers, and their capabilities could be grossly underestimated by these types of exams. Although President Bush is a supporter, many influential people are against this bill, including the largest teacher’s union in the United States, which has formed a commission in opposition to the President’s proposal.
Under pressure the body will start to fidget in an effort to steady its nerves and in a game of High Stakes Texas Hold’em the more the player fidgets the worse they tend to play. Their behavior can reveal many ideas about the person for example how well they work under stress, if they are comfortable associating with others in a competitive setting, and if they are confident in their decisions. Interpreting someone’s passive actions, while not being judgmental about it, can improve your own literacy as body movemen...
Sacks, Peter. "The Toll Standardized Tests Take." National Education Association. 2000. Web. 2 July 2015.
Exercise can have many effects on the body. A lack of exercise can create several significant health problems, while an abundancy of exercise can ultimately lead to a healthy body. Exercise comes in many different forms that you can choose from. You can walk for about an hour and lose a portion of calories or you can run a couple miles and lose even more calories. If you watch television, you have likely saw one of those exercise commercials with exercise equipment like treadmills, elliptical trainers, and stationary bicycles that you can use. Or instead of using those methods, you can be active in fun ways like playing a sport such as basketball or baseball as well as dancing which all count as exercise. Studies have shown that just by being
“If my future were determined just by my performance on a standardized test, I wouldn't be here. I guarantee you that.” This quote by Michelle Obama illustrates the idea that standardized testing should not have such a large influence on education in America. However, a majority of people are under the impression that standardized tests are an accurate method to measure a person's intellectual ability. I believe that standardized tests have developed into a very critical part of the American education system that is hindering the growth of students and teachers instead of providing a tool that can accurately measure knowledge.
Take brisk 30 to 40 minute walks at least three days a week. Aerobic walking increases the efficiency of your heart and lungs, lowers blood pressure and resting heart rate, relieves stress, raises metabolism, improves muscle tone, and improves the health of the bones. If your pace is too slow, however, you will not get the aerobic benefits.
In addition to holding back on some of your favorite foods you should also make sure that you do physical activity. To burn the extra calories, you need to be physically active at least thirty minutes each day. You can take a trail walk or a run around your neighborhood. It doesn’t matter what you do even if you decide to take a run through the mall. There are so many benefits from physical activity. It doesn’t only help with weight management but it also reduces the risks of high blood pressure and colon cancer. While increasing HDL cholesterol, preventing coronary heart disease and diabetes, physical activity also provides healthy and strong bones. If you want to lose the weight, you should put physical activity on your lists schedules.
Leverage and integrated business model to continue exploring and participating in new lines of beverages