Stage of Team development

1111 Words3 Pages

An individual unable to complete all the works by his own, everyone relies on the other’s support and guidance to achieve success. Similarly, a difficult task can be accomplished easily by working as a team. A team is a group of individuals who share the common interest working together to achieve the same goals. Every organisation has teams with members working as one. Team development is a process of linking the individual together to accomplish a task. According to Tuckman’s model, there are five stages of team development, which are forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning (as cited in Fraser & Neville, 1994). The forming of the team occurs in the first stage of team development. It is an exploration period where the team members will examine the function and the purpose of the team (Torres & Fairbanks, 1996). During this period, the group identity is limited and team members will have a strong dependence on the leader. The study of Moxon (1993) claimed that team members tend to rely on the group leader for direction. This is probably due to the reason where they are not really sure what to do and expect from the other team members. This period is often hard to bear with as there will be a lot of misunderstandings occur among the team members (Fraser and Neville, 1994). The study of Fraser and Neville (1994) also found that people seldom have the opportunity to choose and form their own teams. Most of the time, they are being appointed to take over the existing teams. Therefore, they tend to behave politely and withhold their true feelings in order to gain acceptance from the other team members (Moxon, 1993). Each member will try to avoid conflicts and serious issues in the team. At the same time, they will start... ... middle of paper ... ...ure usage. Hut also found that the groups which undergo failure in their project should do evaluation among the groups and learn the lessons. Additionally, Hut believes that it is also a chance for the group members to farewell to each other and hopes for the best in the next venture. Precisely, progression of all groups may not be smooth throughout these stages (Ivanvich & Matteson, 2002). Based on Ivanvich and Matteson’s study, this is due to several factors which may sabotage or ease the process. For instance, entry of new members and leaving of old members may not finish the performing stage (Ivanvich and Matteson, 2002). Ivanvich and Matteson also stated that operation and alert of due dates by group members are also one of the factors which affect the patterns of the group development.

Open Document