Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of sporting events on society
Impact of sporting events on society
Impact of sporting events on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of sporting events on society
Sports and Politics: How they Relate? From the outcome of a vote in congress to a newly suggested policy sports have affected politics for plenty of years dating back to the late 19th Century. Whether it's putting an end to segregation through baseball, the making of a new ally because of soccer, or the boosting of an economy because of a single sporting event there are countless occurrences in which a sport helped better a country. Where there are miracles there are also tragedies, sports can also affect politics negatively, with the tragedies far outweighing the miracles. There have been boycotts from a government, political embarrassment, and the worst, mass killings, all of which happening as a result of sports. The same goes for politics and government affecting a sporting event, there have been games set at a specific location purely to boost the economy of that city, certain teams being chosen to win a sporting event based on them having a disaster occurring recently, or even a country refusing to allow their athletes to compete to solidify their history and what they hope to achieve. As sports affects politics negatively politics can also affect sports negatively, there have been counties killing others during sporting events, countries being dismantled because of sporting events, and even countries refusing to have others participate in a sporting event because of their religion, ethnicity, etc. When asked to describe both sports and politics in one phrase reporter George Vecsey (2012) said “Obama plays it safe for a field goal. Clinton needs to hit a grand slam. McCain is preparing for a marathon. Candidates cannot afford any blunders, like Billy Conn trying to knock out Joe Louis in 1941. Apparently, we sports buffs can... ... middle of paper ... ...e Russians legislation of anti-gay laws makes for a tough situation for the U.S. government because they have to decide between participating and being seen as awful people for holding out the gay/lesbian athletes or they don’t participate and be viewed as weak by the powerhouses of the Olympics. Hitler’s' era showed that no matter how powerful a government may be if humiliated by a single man the government will be knocked down a peg. The Olympics have brought about much bloodshed, boycotting, and protest too dating back as early the 1930s and lasting up from the 1980 to even present day. These are a few of the many different cases in which politics have affected sports and how sports have affected politics. The prior examples just set into stone that sports have any effect on politics whether it be positive or negative there is still a correlation between the two.
The rules that govern Olympic Games clearly indicate that no political propaganda and their demonstrations are not allowed in the Games. However, Olympics Games have faced political wars over the years. Governments fight one another for a chance to host the games. Some governments have used their chance to host to Olympic Games to advance their political and sometimes personal agendas. Hosting the Games should benefit the citizens and athletes economically. However, not all governments are concerned with benefits to their nationals when fighting for their chance to host the games. The games have become a stage for nations to prove their might and stability to other nations at the expense of their citizens. This
The year is 1972 and people are ready for the summer Olympics. Unfortunately for the eager sports spectators the 1972 Munich Olympics have a much more tragic story line. People don’t talk about any records broken or international competitiveness, instead people remember the Munich Games because of the hostage situation. A Palestinian formed group called the Black September terrorist captured nine Israeli Olympic athletes. Jim McKay one of the Olympic sportscasters at the games says, “The Munich tragedy was the biggest event in my career and the most terrible.” Truly Munich’s is tarnishing the Olympic Games. Even today the impact and repercussions of the game can be felt not only with the heightened security protocol but a lasting social impact as well.
1. It has become much harder to identify the true and amateur-taught values around sport in our culture. The passion for competition, the aspect of a team, and the actions of sportsmanship are deep values that sports act to instill. It becomes one of the most important ways to teach those values to our young and unfortunately is becoming easy to forget. Throughout the semester we scrutinized sports, looking at their influence, role, and meaning in our American society today. Two foundations to view sport, critical and functionalist theory, were brought upon early in the semester, laying groundwork for looking at the rest of the topics. To better understand these two view points a working definition of each is needed. The three C’s of: capitalism, coercion and commercialism help describe the critical/conflict theory and view of sport in our United States. When looking with this viewpoint some of sport’s purposes in society include, promoting and expanding capitalistic drives as well as showing the power and privilege of elite groups within society. (Coakley, 2001) On the contrary the ...
The Olympics are supposed to be a time of peace and a time where countries could come together and be free from politics. The Olympics are also a time where nations should put away their differences and celebrate the reason why they came to participate in the games, which was to play sports. Throughout history, many of the Olympics have lived up to this expectation. At the same time, there have also been some Olympics that have not lived up to this expectation because they have been experienced boycotts, political protests, and even violence. The politics in the Olympics need to be kept out because it there is no place for it. The 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow is an example of one Olympics that was not free from politics because of the boycott started by the U.S.
In the chapter “ Sport and the Nation: Out of the Left Field ”, Gamal Abdel-Shehid and Nathan Kalman-Lamb discuss the idea of the nation, in particular, the history of how it came to existence and the application of such notion to the world of sport. The authors point out that, “ if people speak the same language, cook the same type of food, wear the same types of clothes, listen to the same types of music, have ancestors who did the same sorts of things and who lived in the same place, they are, it appears, part of the same nation” ( Abdel-Shehid,& Kalman-Lamb, 2011). However, a social theorist called Benedict Anderson analyzed nationalism through the concept of “imagined community” (Abdel-Shehid,& Kalman-Lamb, 2011). This term basically means that people tend to feel the sense of belongingness to a certain nation without actually knowing anybody (personally) from that nation. An example could be when these nations participate in events such as the Olympic Games (RIO).
Throughout the years, sports have played two roles in society. They have acted as a stage for historical events as well as a mirror for American History. Athletics acted as a mirror for critical chapters in American History, such as the Great Depression. In other aspects of history, sports have become the stage. These events include issues of gender roles in society.
Politics is the art or science of government or governing, especially the governing of a political entity, such as a nation, and the administration and control of its internal and external affairs. The Olympic Games is an event held every 4 years, which includes a variety of sport activities in which different countries compete against one another. “Sport is frequently a tool of diplomacy. By sending delegations of athletes abroad, states can establish a first basis for diplomatic relations or can more effectively maintain such relations” (Espy 3). One might think that politics and the Olympics have nothing to do with each other, but in fact they do have a lot in common. How did politics affect the Olympic Games in 1936, 1968 and 1972?
Sports of old were merely competitive activities rooted in heroism and romanticism. Sports activities today, however, have no such innocence or simplicity. Currently in America, the activities that make up our sports culture is not only the competitive events themselves but the processes and issues that underlie and surround them. Entwined in our sports culture is the giant business of mass broadcasting. Indeed, sports and the media go hand in hand like peanut butter and jelly, like Mickey and Minnie, Darth Vader and Luke. They are intertwined and depend on each other to continue to grow. Sports media includes television, radio, magazines, newspapers, books, films, and, now, most importantly, social media devices provided by the Internet. Sports media has had it advantages and its disadvantages and its truths and falsehoods in the world of sports culture.
The separation of sports from politics is but only a myth, and several examples have proven that to be correct (Malhado and Araujo 2017, p.523). Several countries have been awarded the right to host major sporting events, but all have come to null due to several political reasons. It has now become a known fact that some countries have refused to express interest in such events for fear of the unknown. Rights groups and dissatisfied citizens usually take advantage of such events to highlight the problems they face so the world should be aware (Malhado and Araujo 2017, p.523). In the recent past, the majority of the countries that have been affected by political reasons in their bid to host such major events include Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and even Israel. For two consecutive years, Bahrain Grand Prix failed when protestors dominated newsrooms countrywide and abroad. Rights groups have been quick to campaign against such countries for failure to adhere to international standards when it comes to human rights, labor, and gender inequality. This has led to calls for the call by major stakeholders that rights should be a condition for any country to bid to host major sports events (Malhado and Araujo 2017,
Although many events happened, sports were a massive event that took place in the 1980s. The U.S. boycott during the 1980 Summer Olympic Games, due to the Soviet Union's invasion of Afghanistan, was a huge political protest. To get revenge, the Soviet Union also did a boycott in 1984. The 3 sports that were popular in the 1980s were football, basketball, and hockey. The boycotts of the U.S. and the Soviet Union affected the Olympics in a massive way. In conclusion, sports were an exuberant event that happened in the 1980s, and sports now wouldn’t be the same without
"Politics has come to be considered not only inappropriate in the arena of sports, but actually antithetical to it," Zirin says. "We want so much to see sports solely as an arena of play, not seriousness. But here's the thing, this can cheapen not only the greatness and relevance of sports to us as a society, but also the courage of the athletes" . The pursuit of fame, wealth and status can blind the human conscience, which is why it is important for us to encourage athletes to voice their opinions. As a nation, we should not silence our athletes, because it is the truly courageous athletes who have the audacity to stand up when it is socially unacceptable. Sports should be used as a platform for a certain kind of politics such as militarism, nationalism and human rights. A few athletes stand out as political advocates of their time who were not afraid to express their opinions: Muhammad Ali, Jackie Robinson, and Billie-Jean King. There is a rich tradition of resistance to politics in sports, but their actions have been integral to country’s struggle for racial and gender equality; sports are a safe place to discuss these difficult topics and therefore is essential.
"Politics has come to be considered not only inappropriate in the arena of sports, but actually antithetical to it," Zirin says. "We want so much to see sports solely as an arena of play, not seriousness. But here's the thing, this can cheapen not only the greatness and relevance of sports to us as a society, but also the courage of the athletes" (The Nation). The pursuit of fame, wealth and status can blind the human conscious, which is why it is important for us to encourage athletes to speak their minds. As a nation, we should not silence the athletes, because it is the truly courageous athletes who have the audacity to stand up when it’s not popular. Sports should be used as a platform for a certain kind of politics: militarism, nationalism. There is a rich tradition of resistance to politics in sports, but their actions have been integral to country’s struggle for racial and gender equality; sports are a safe place to discuss these difficult topics.
The movie Invictus brings up several key points about the media in everyday life. One of the most prominent points brought up in the film is that sports have the power to bring people together and unite them with a common goal. Sports are an enormous part of the media and cultures all over the world. Whether it be the Super-bowl, World Cup, or Olympics, millions of people continue to unite and cheer for the teams they support. The reason in which sports often unites people is that it gives people something in common with one another. No matter what race, age, or gender, people of all types enjoy watching and supporting sports teams which is why it is such a powerful means to unite people.
Sport creates friendships between people who would not normally communicate. This is great against racism since when people support the same ideals, they have something in common. This encourages communication between people and friendships between different people. Joe Humphrey says that sport creates “barriers between groups” which I think is wrong since people start friendships with all religions due to sport unifying people when supporting the same team.
... some sort of political intention. The extent of the connection between politics and the Modern Olympics was not intended. Countries boycott particular Games in order to send a political message to the hosting country or any country attending the Games. Increased publicity on the hosting country can bring up political issues causing countries to boycott the Games. Throughout the years groups of people were kept from participating in the Games based on who was hosting the Games. Both the Ancient and the Modern Olympics were created with the intention of having some political connections, although Pierre de Coubertin could never have imagined just how much politics are involved in the Olympics today. They Olympics will continue to be infected with politics because countries have seen firsthand the political advantages that come with hosting the Olympic Games.