Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: D
In order to answer the question, “What new political concepts developed during the Enlightenment?” the analysis of two primary sources will be necessary. The first source, The Spirit of Laws by Baron de Montesquieu, is a contemporary, originally published anonymously in 1748, that explores the role of law in shaping political entities and provides answers to problems dealing with despotism; the exercise of absolute power, especially in a cruel and oppressive way. Montesquieu (1689-1755) was a French historian, philosopher, and satirist who is most known for his theory of separation of powers who also believed that in every government there are three sorts of power and political orders were like a human body with a dynamic balance and a healthy …show more content…
A “principle" is what drives each classification of political system. This principle motivates citizens’ behaviour that usually support that government and make it work. For democratic republics, this principle is the goodness of the community, the willingness of citizens to sacrifice their needs before the needs of the community. For monarchies, the principle is the love of honour meaning that the authoritative figure always wants to improve himself and succeed his country over others. Finally, for despotisms, the principle is being afraid of the leader. According to Montesquieu, “A political system cannot last long if its appropriate principle is lacking”. He argues this logic is the reason why the English failed to become a republic after the Civil War of 1642-1651, because the society needed to have the principle of goodness. A second major theme in The Spirit of Laws is political liberty, what it is and how to keep it. “Political liberty” is defined by Montesquieu as personal security. He elaborates on how one form of political liberty consists in self-government and being able to do what you want without restriction. In order for his ideas about political liberty to work, the powers of the government should have different levels each …show more content…
The idea of a government that secures freedom, justice and relative equality amongst all citizens is a common one to both Montesquieu and Rousseau. The possible answers to the questions: “What new political concepts were developed during the Enlightenment?” and “What new ideas were brought forward concerning the notions of liberty, free will, nature, reason, social contracts, etc.?” can be found in Montesquieu’s The Spirit of Law and Rousseau’s The Social Contract. Montesquieu creates political concepts that revolve around equality and emphasizes this by his idea of splitting the government into different sectors to try to ensure the citizens are all treated fairly. One sector is responsible for making laws, one for military and the last branch is for punishing crimes made by the citizens of the state. Rousseau suggests that citizens as a collective should be seen like one body of people. Rousseau believes that collectively, everyone should believe in the same set of rules as opposed to one man creating a set for everyone to follow. Based on these two sources, it can be said that equality can never be achieved as long as there is one official ruler or form of government.These philosophers both
Rousseau, however, believed, “the general will by definition is always right and always works to the community’s advantage. True freedom consists of obedience to laws that coincide with the general will.”(72) So in this aspect Rousseau almost goes to the far extreme dictatorship as the way to make a happy society which he shows in saying he, “..rejects entirely the Lockean principle that citizens possess rights independently of and against the state.”(72)
The Enlightenment political thought helped the Glorious Revolution of 1688 in England. James II wanted to strengthen his royal power alone and weaken the militia while raising his own army. The Enlightenment helped the English opponent to come forth and overthrow their king with the help of the Prince William of Orange and his wife Mary. They then reestablished the monarchy and accepted the Parliaments Bill of Rights. With the Enlightenment period, individuals helped get their words out and they learned to questions their ideals and beliefs. With the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the individuals were able to overthrown their king and establish the representative government and that a well-regulated militia under the locals control was best for everyone. The Enlightenment political thought helped the Glorious Revolution to establish a representative government and take control on what’s best for
Rousseau believes its possible to have both complete freedom and yet also legitimate authority. The essential outline Rousseau paints an equal relation between freedom and the authority of state. He argues that we as naturally free people, if it doesn't detract from our freedom. `If one must obey because of force, one need not do so out of duty; and if one is no longer forced to obey one is no longer obliged' (Rousseau: Cress (ed.), 1987, bk1, ch.3, p.143). Therefore Rousseau has shown that superior power, naked force or power through tradition is not the source of any legitimate authority the state has over us. Rousseau's fundamental problem is to find a solution of structuring the state so that we can live in a state and yet remain as free as possible. Hence, by sacrificing our particular will on major social or national matters in favour of the general will we are ennobled and freed .
The Enlightenment was a major turning point in history. Multiple ideas that were established during the Enlightenment were eventually utilized in many government systems. Although some people known as “Enlightened Despots” did not accept the ideas developed by people such as John Locke, Baron de Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Ultimately, the Enlightenment ideas showed that they were more powerful and were more significant than the power of the army.
The Enlightenment period in Europe was a shift in the way that society thought about power and liberty. The ideals of this period helped to inspire the revolutions of the 18th century. The American colonies desired liberty from foreign rule, the French wanted to increase the power of the people in their class structure, and the Haitians fought for representation for the millions of slaves on their island. While the ideas of the enlightenment were not fully employed in each of these revolutions, they brought the nations closer to a fully representative government, rather than one of absolute power.
The American Revolutionary system served as a model, exemplifying the potential for great change and consolidation. The United States Constitution also provided a template for the French National Assembly. Montesquieu’s proposal of the separation of powers, as well as democratic conventions with representatives of the French people provided protection for the people against their government, securing “the greatest freedom and security for a state” (Duiker and Spielvogel 463). According to Article XV, people possessed the right to hold government officials accountable for their actions, developing a moral incentive as well as a foundational right for a more democratic society (National Assembly). France’s preparation for their independence showed a strong desire for equality and representation that mirrored that of the United
The Enlightenment itself ignited the changes in perspective that were needed to provoke improvement in society and set new standards for our future. These standards spread rather rapidly across Europe and eventually to America and challenged the old order. These ideas of rational thinking over religion and authority delivered a vast political change throughout the world which can still be felt today. These revolutionary thoughts of rationalism brought on freedom of speech and the demand for equality in society. This was not only the igniter to the French revolution but was also, how many governments including the United States based their modern
The Enlightenment was a time of social growth that was driven by four philosophers; Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Charles Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Each of the four philosophers had different views on how to, the government should be ran and organized. The way today’s government is based upon some of the things that the each of them believed and stated. An example of an enlightenment would be the European movement of the 17th and 18th century that was influenced by Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, Rousseau.
His system of three branches substantially influenced the United States’ government as we know it today as he seeked to modify the system by assigning different roles to the three different branches with an equivalence of powers; furthermore, his system managed to maintain law and order, liberty of the public, and the property of the individuals without creating violence and corruption with the government. Each of the branches also has it’s own job of casting votes, making laws, and ensuring that these laws are constitutional and beneficial to it’s citizens; as stated by Rousseau: “The conjuring tricks of our political theorists are very like that; they first dismember the Body politic by an illusion worthy of a fair, and then join it together again we know not how”. He points out that Montesquieu’s ideas are just an illusion that lures people into thinking that the branches are separated but is actually branches separated as one whole system; despite Rousseau’s accuracy and attempt to denigrate Montesquieu’s theory, this manipulative system didn’t cause corruptions, oppress
The political philosophy of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx examined the role that the state played and its relationship to its citizen’s participation and access to the political economy during different struggles and tumultuous times. Rousseau was a believer of the concept of social contract with limits established by the good will and community participation of citizens while government receives its powers given to it. Karl Marx believed that power was to be taken by the people through the elimination of the upper class bourgeois’ personal property and capital. While both philosophers created a different approach to establishing the governing principles of their beliefs they do share a similar concept of eliminating ownership of capital and distributions from the government. Studying the different approaches will let us show the similarities of principles that eliminate abuse of power and concentration of wealth by few, and allow access for all. To further evaluate these similarities, we must first understand the primary principles of each of the philosophers’ concepts.
“almost certainly it was Rousseau who taught Tocqueville to see the root of love of equality in human nature and to see its centrality for political life. My whole interpretation, then, might be summed up by saying that Tocqueville attempts to rewrite Montesquieu’s political science by way of an extension of Rousseau’s reinterpretation of human nature.”
The Enlightenment was an astonishing time of transformation in Europe. During this time in the eighteenth century there was a progressive movement that was labeled by its criticism of the normal religious, social, and political perceptions. A number of significant thinkers, with new philosophies, had inspired creativeness and change. These thinkers had many different thoughts and views on people and the way they act, and views on the government. Two well-known and most influential thinkers of this time were the English political philosopher John Locke and the French political philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau. These two men had laid down some of the intellectual grounds of the modern day government and both had different opinions on what the government’s role in a society.
middle of paper ... ... r their mutual benefit. Overall it can be said that Rousseau was a radical thinker who put forward revolutionary theories. He put forward the theory that the government was based on a contract, that is the consent of the governed, and that society should be led by the general will, for him the best government was the republic. Because it was sensitive to the desires of the people.
...time onward, the concept of the enlightened despot had currency, calling for rulers governing with the betterment of the people's lot in mind. The idea of a centralized, authority-wielding confederation government is not terribly foreign to the notion of an autocratic, authoritarian, but enlightened despot, after all. This is but one of the conflicting ideas ranged against Rousseau's rather pessimistically realist conclusion; others are certainly possible.
...ons on what kind of government should prevail within a society in order for it to function properly. Each dismissed the divine right theory and needed to start from a clean slate. The two authors agree that before men came to govern themselves, they all existed in a state of nature, which lacked society and structure. In addition, the two political philosophers developed differing versions of the social contract. In Hobbes’ system, the people did little more than choose who would have absolute rule over them. This is a system that can only be derived from a place where no system exists at all. It is the lesser of two evils. People under this state have no participation in the decision making process, only to obey what is decided. While not perfect, the Rousseau state allows for the people under the state to participate in the decision making process. Rousseau’s idea of government is more of a utopian idea and not really executable in the real world. Neither state, however, describes what a government or sovereign should expect from its citizens or members, but both agree on the notion that certain freedoms must be surrendered in order to improve the way of life for all humankind.