Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Spankings negative effect
Effectiveness of corporal punishment
Spankings negative effect
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Spankings negative effect
Jacob Busby-Smith
Hon English ll
Ms. Seidner
12-4-14
Physical Punishment Spanking/Beating is an often very popular way of teaching a child what is right and what is wrong but is it actually an effective way of disciplining a child? Studies have shown that adults that were physically punished as children showed higher rates of depression, anxiety, and substance abuse. There are many ways to discipline a child without beating them and potentially causing traumatic personality problems. Physical Punishment shouldn’t be tolerated, it’s cruel and does more harm than good to the children around the world. Physical punishment is what involves the deliberate infliction of pain as retribution for an offence. with a lot of families Physical force/punishment
…show more content…
Tom Corson of the Kern County Network for Children said, “There’s a fine line between spanking as a form of discipline and as a form of abuse and a lot of it just depends on intent and severity. A little swat on the butt is not gonna constitute as abuse, but if there is broken skin, those types of things are gonna constitute as abuse.” This statement shows that what Peterson was doing was not a spanking, it was a terrible beating of a 4-year-old with a tree branch.(www.breakersfeildnow.com) Peterson’s reasoning for his actions is that, that’s how he was disciplined as a child so he was going to raise his child the exact same way. He wasn’t beating his son to death or anything of that nature, but that is how he was taught to deal with situations. This is a perfect example of how parents beating/spanking their children excessively comes out later on in the child's life when they mature. They were never taught how to manage a situation in a more verbal and less aggressive way, they resorted to physical force to express their anger and in a lot of cases that can be seen as
“Peterson has said he never intended to harm his son and was only disciplining him in the way he had been as a child growing up in East Texas.” No one has the right to tell you how to chastise your child but, there are other ways to go about the situation. You may never mean to harm your children and the way you discipline them may be considered child abuse. Peterson handled his case in a negative way. He should not have put the 4-year-old through the same thing he went through at such a young age.
The idea of physical punishment has been visible throughout our nation’s history. The 30’s, 40’, 50’s all encouraged the use of strong physical discipline towards children, it wasn’t until the 60’s and 70’s that this idea became taboo. “Many of us in the room had been smacked, whipped, or beaten as children...
The practice of spanking is commonly endorsed by most religions, including Christianity (“Corporal punishment deep rooted”). Spanking is an important aspect of a child’s social development and should not be considered an evil form of abuse. In her argument, Debra Saunders says that there is an obvious difference between beating a child and spanking a child, and parents know the boundary.
When describing a physical altercation between two adults, the term is assault and battery. Assault on an individual has more than immediate effects; the effects can last a lifetime in severe cases. In all fifty states, it is a crime to hit, strike or use corporal punishment in any deliberate manner towards any person over the age of eighteen. However, this law does not apply to physical force being used on minors. Spanking, whipping, and paddling are among a few common references to this form of punishment. Physically disciplining children has had many names over the years. No matter which term is used, corporal punishment has a negative impact on every party involved. It is a widely used, socially accepted method of discipline. “Approximately 94% of three and four-year old children have been spanked in the past year (Slade & Winssow 1321). Although spanking is a widespread practice, it is becoming more controversial. The negative effects of spanking greatly outweigh the benefits. Spanking is a socially tolerated view promoting abusive patterns, and has a negative psychological impact in teaching children that pain, fear, and confusion promote conformability.
First of all, spanking does not lead to violence. Our surrounding world and media do. "The average sixteen-year- old has watched 18,000 murders during his formative years, including a daily bombardment of stabbings, shootings, hangings, decapitations, and general dismemberment" (Meier 34). It seems unjust to blame parents who are trying to raise their children properly for today's violence. If a child touches a hot stove he does not become a more violent person because of it, he just learns not to do it again because he learned a valuable lesson from the pain (Meier 34).
The term corporal punishment means the intentional infliction of pain on the body for purposes of punishment and includes slapping, hitting with objects, pinching, shaking and forcing to stand for long periods of time (Epoch 1). Family researchers define corporal punishment as " the use of physical force aimed at causing children to experience pain but not injury, for the purposes of correction and control of youthful behavior" (Day 83). Spanking is one form of physical or corporal punishment (Epoch 1).
Smith states in his introduction “many studies have shown physical punishment — including spanking, hitting and other means of causing pain — can lead to increased aggression, antisocial behavior, physical injury and mental health problems for children.” Throughout the article, many studies show that children do become more aggressive however, there were also studies mentioned that support the use of physical punishment on children between the ages of two and six years old. This does show that his research is thorough however, it still leads to room for error in his broad statement of physical punishment causing harmful effects to
If there is no need to physically harm your child why would you? To digress, spanking comes from an older school of thought, and should be left in the old school of thought. Furthermore, aggression in children was directly linked to being spanked. With an overabundance of supporting evidence, Legislation needs to be put in place to prevent aggressive adolescent
I can not think of any other time someone has relied on striking someone to teach them. Some people argue that child not be reasoned since they are young and they understand better through spanking. While others might say that it is perfectly fine because of religion, such as spanking being in the bible. I believe the better argument is why are we relying on such a old method of punishment. Things have changed alot since the day of the bible so why use an outdated and cruel form of a teaching children.
“The United Nations has said unequivocally that ‘corporal punishment and other cruel or degrading forms of punishment are forms of violence’” (Gershoff, 2013). Article 19 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child begins to be violated when spanking a child occurs. Article 19 mentions that it protects children against any type of mental or physical violence. Almost all other countries, except for the United States, Somalia, and South Sudan, have abolished the use of corporal punishment toward children.
"Spanking doesn 't work, and it just makes kids mistrustful and aggressive. What we 're teaching them is fear rather than responsibility and problem-solving." said Kimberly Sirl, a clinical psychologist at St. Louis Children 's Hospital (Blythe). This is important because parents need to understand spanking doesn 't work and it results that the child becomes aggressive and mistrustful. Parents are trying to teach their child a lesson but instead making them fearful. Children will be aggressive and think violence is the answer to everything. The point of spanking is to teach the child what they did was wrong but kids don 't get that message when they get physically abused. It teaches them the wrong lesson and they think that it 's okay to spank kids so when they get older they will probably do the same thing. Corporal punishment of a child by a caregiver is legal in every state, but it crosses the line to abuse when a child is injured. Doctors and teachers are required to report to authorities any marks, bruises, cuts or other injuries inflicted on a child (Blythe). Anyone who is a caregiver of a child is legally allowed to hit the child. It only becomes an issue or problem when the child is left with bruises, marks, and injuries. If a doctor or teacher were to see any type of bruise on the child they are required to report it. There is spanking a
Claiming that children who are spanked as children don’t know how to self-regulate their emotions nor are they able to establish healthy relationships as adults. Moreover, it makes it extremely difficult for these children to follow adults guidance because they don’t have any faith in them consequently, creating more aggressive and antisocial children. Furthermore, a study conducted by the ABC news from U.S and 12 different countries over the period of 50 years demonstrated that children who were spanked were more likely to have mental health problems, as well as, problematic relationships with their parents and lower cognitive ability. Lastly, the study also found that children who are spanked are at greater risk of being physically abused by their parents. Claiming that, “ spanking and physical abuse are not categorically different behaviors but rather are points along a continuum of hitting children.”
Corporal punishment is the physical disciplinary method used by parents, teachers, and school administrators in an effort to correct a child’s undesirable behaviors. The use of physical force is one that is often times controversial and usually evokes very strong reactions. These feelings surface, and opposing views clash, when scandals surrounding corporal punishment hit the media and heated arguments in the comments section of articles emerge. While corporal punishment occasionally makes its way into the limelight, it is a decision all parents are faced with eventually and often times daily. For example, when a toddler is sprawled out on the grocery store floor kicking, hitting, and flinging
When used infrequently and with reasoning, corporal punishment reduces defiance and lowers rates of antisocial behavior as compared to alternative disciplinary tactics (Larzelere and Kuhn, 27). Corporal punishment is defined as a form of physical punishment involving the use of hand or another object to hit the bottom of a child to correct misbehavior. Spanking has been the main source of child discipline, dating back to ancient Babylon, Greece, and Rome. More recently, Scientists have discovered a link between physical punishment and psychological problems. Much research, conducted in the 90’s, concludes that corporal punishment has a direct link to short and long-term psychological and social issues.
There are cases where many schools have been banned from taking such action on children because there are no positive effects of using violence instead of making them listen to the adult in a civilized manner. Beating the child can make them more timid, afraid and even insecure about their capabilities and prevent them from becoming confident. In fact, there are cases where the psychological impact can be so severe that the child remains permanently afraid and hesitant to progress in a particular manner because of the punishment that was inflicted for making a mistake. Such a psychological impact is a serious issue that harms a healthy mental and emotional development ("Corporal Punishment in Schools and Its Effect on Academic Success" Joint HRW/ACLU Statement,