Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Explain social classification and its impact in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences was written by Geoffrey Bowker and Susan Leigh Star in 1999 and published by Massachusetts Institute of Technology. This work, specifically the introduction discusses the idea of classification and how its patterns are a result of human nature. The authors argue that ultimately the reason we classify can be attributed to human qualities. This thesis is supported by relevant examples in our own lives. For example, the authors write about the classification found in a modern home from the fabric of the furniture to the various codes of building permits allowed. The act of classifying, according to the authors, is almost unconscious. They take this idea a step further by describing the process of classifying as being invisible. The introduction ultimately sets up a foundation for the authors to examine information infrastructures by using classification examples such as the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and the Nursing Interventions Classification. Their goal is to question why and how classification plays a role in life and human interaction.
The authors commonly use relatable
…show more content…
examples to portray their ideas. For instance, the chapter begins with the example of a scene of The X-Files to demonstrate how intertwined human lives are with classification. Another technique that is used to persuade the readers is through the use of rhetorical questions. These literary elements serve to propel the points of argument. This observation can be proven by how the authors use rhetorical devices to question the nature and purpose of standards and classification. The authors argue that as they call it- the material force of categories- will be constant and is proven by asking the readers to find an example of when organization is not integral in life. Another idea presented is the challenge in changing preexisting categories.
The Power to Name written by Hope A. Olson has similarities with this work in that classification systems are examined. Both authors argue that classification is part of life and can be considered a necessity. Basically, classification is ubiquitous and relevant to all facets of life. The Power to Name proves the difficulties posed by challenging a preexisting classification system (Dewey Decimal Classification) an idea that was brought up in Sorting Things Out. The idea of universality in classification is examined in Sorting Things Out by considering the lenses of anthropology, sociology, and history. Classification was used as a tool for understanding cultures for anthropologists, while sociologists have associated this with social
movements. In order to proceed further in the book, the authors define both classifications and standards. The distinction between the two is that while they may be similar, standards are part of the larger argument and have to do with agreed-upon rules and has a wide practice while classification is consistent and the categories are mutually exclusive. Examples are given to better illustrate these two terms. The authors claim that the ICD is labeled as a classification for the purposes of the book even though it is often thought to be a nomenclature system. The “Introduction” also outlines the structure of the book by breaking it into three themes to accurately explore the way infrastructures and classification systems play a role in society. These three themes include classification and large scale infrastructure, classification and biography, and classification and work practice. The authors of this work seek to understand the role of invisibility in classification and human interaction by also understanding the origin of the categories and how they stand to be invisible. The message is directed to the readers through experts in the field, classification systems, and relevant examples. The topic of classification and its effect on human lifestyle is significant in understanding how to improve as a society. For example, the authors explain how ethics and morality are involved with classification. The U.S. immigration and Naturalization Service’s methodology in classification of races as desirably or not bolters the ethically compromising quota system. Additionally, this work shows another aspect of research in that there are parts that have not been figured out and that there is value in old or unconventional methods.
People all around agree that technology is changing how we think, but is it changing us for the better? Clive Thompson definitely thinks so and this book is his collection of why that is. As an avid fiction reader I wasn’t sure this book would captivate me, but the 352 pages seemingly flew past me. The book is a whirlwind of interesting ideas, captivating people, and fascinating thoughts on how technology is changing how we work and think.
o In matters of “race” and “nationality”, in the way in which classifications work is especially apparent.
Among carpenters, it is a well-known fact that building a house upon a solid foundation is imperative. When beginning the construction of a home, the foundation is always the first step leading to success, for without it, the house will become unstable. During extreme weather, such as floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, and other conditions, a slight fault in the foundation of a home will most likely guarantee significant damage, if not complete destruction. Similar to a house, a person’s identity must rest upon a firm foundation; otherwise, it may not be capable of withstanding the ominous conditions of the world. When trials and burdens threaten to crumble people’s identities, their foundations must stand their ground and overcome the various tribulations. Although there are billions of inhabitants of the world, no two people share the same identity; rather, each person has unique memories, stories, events, and artifacts influencing who they have become. Some people’s identities may reflect a difficult childhood of discrimination, poverty, and hatred similar to the one described by Malcolm X in his article, “Nightmare.” Other people may associate with Katie Pederson and her article, “Identity,” in which they are defined through a simple artifact such as an identification card. In addition, numerous unfortunate people may struggle from the devastating effects of memory loss similar to those Floyd Skloot experienced, and they are helpless as their memories and identity slowly slip away from them. Still other people may find themselves desperately searching for acceptance and identity similar to the homeless man in Gina Berriault’s article, “Who Is It Can Tell Me Who I Am.” Unlike the homeless man and Malcolm X, I was fortuna...
When it comes to the definition of technology in their articles, both Carr and Cascio have similarities and differences. Both authors are debating about the use of technology in today’s society. Both of their articles touch base on the ideals of “what technology is” in their perspectives. Carr believes that technology is making us want the quick path to information or common knowledge and says the Internet is “a machine designed for the efficient and automated collection, transmission, and manipulation of information”. Cascio also believes th...
From the perspective of humanism, identity is something fixed, unchangeable and stable. With the development of deconstruction, new ideas about identity begin to prevail. Deconstructionists regard human identity “as a fluid, fragmented, dynamic collectivity of possible ‘selves’” (Tyson 335). Eddie’s identity is always fragmented, and each of the children represents a fragment of his identity. From the perspective of
The power of labeling can be seen in the the name that we were given. The name we use affects the way people treat you. It can also affect the behavior of other and how you behave also. This concept is basically the reactions we get from people and ourselves aswell from just naming things.
Shaw, Debbie. ”THEREFORE I AM - TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN IDENTITY.” Updated January 1997. Retrieved November 16th, 2004. http://learning.unl.ac.uk/humanIT/cybersf/ident.htm
Throughout society there are a lot of identities one might categorize themselves within; based on knowledge and opinions and fundamentally a way of life. The Social Identity theory, proposed by Henry Tajfel in the 1970’s is designed to explain and help aid in the understanding of how it is one might develop a connection and belonging to particular groups within society; but more importantly providing an understanding as to how the mechanics of discrimination regarding other groups work.
In 1758 a Swedish botanist named Carolus Linnaeus established the classification system still in use for various forms of life. He listed four categories that he labeled as "varieties" of the human species. To each he attributed inherited biological as well as learned cultural characteristics. He described Homo European as light-skinned, blond, and governed by laws; Homo American was copper-colored and was regulated by customs; Homo Asiatic was sooty and dark-eyed and governed by opinions; Homo African was black and indolent and governed by impulse. We can in retrospect recognize the ethnocentric assumptions involved in these descriptions, which imply a descending order of prestige. Most striking is the labeling of the four varieties as governed by laws, customs, opinions, and impulse, with Europeans on the top and Africans at the bottom. In fact, different populations within all four varieties would have had all four forms of behavior. (8).
THESIS: Scientists and other intellectuals recognize the modern concept of "race" as an artificial category that developed over the past five centuries due to encounters with non-European people. Even though people still attempt to organize humans into categories according to their race, these categories have been shown to have no scientific basis.
Social identities are multiple, they may even overlap and can be linked to differences and similarities of others. Sociologists such as Erving Goffman or Harold Garfinkel consider that identities are socially constructed. In general identities are understood as ‘what people do’, rather than ‘what they are’, the given example of a person in the street looking in shop windows carrying bags, buying things, would be seen as a shopper (Taylor 2009 pg173) illustrates this. In everyday life people’s identities are part of social lives, in a two way relationship. We make society as much as it makes us, this helps to create as well as maintains social order. Identities can be both negatively and positively valued, and they are not always chosen, they can be given also. Homeless people for example have been labelled with a negative identity of ‘street people’, this was given to them by ourselves, which are considered to have a much more positive identity. This t...
Labelling theory has some limitations when used to describe queerness. Firstly, the “deviant” label does not actually create the queerness it describes, but rather emphasizes the importance of this label to society through the negative sanctions experienced by queer individuals. This theory overlooks the initial deviant act and therefore, the label does not actually create the deviance. As Clinard and Meier (2014) state, secondary deviation can occur even without arrest and negative sanctions. Most people who develop homosexual identities do so independent of contact with police officers or psychiatrists. This theory also does not provide concrete explanation of how much negative sanctions are needed to acquire a deviant label. Some queer individuals will experience less negative sanctions than others, but that does not make their label any less queer because one person cannot be more “gay” than another. And as discussed in lecture, labelling theory focuses on lower class deviance, but social and economic class has nothing to do with queerness.
Labelling theory was acknowledged and more commonly known during 1960’s yet towards the 1980’s it was seen as less supportive and was being critiqued by other scholars and theorists. One of the reasons to why labelling theory was becoming less supported and critiqued more frequently was due to lack of research being conducted in the field, however in recent years there has been an increased interest in labelling theory and its perspectives (Lopes and Krohn et al., 2012, pp. 457-458).
This paper is examining how the Dewey Decimal Classification System (DDC) has been adapted and translated in both Western and non-Western Nations and the problems that have arisen during this process. In this paper we will first examine what the DDC is which includes looking into its history specifically into how Mr. Custer helped the DDC become an international classification system. Next we will focus on the problems that arise during the process of adapting and translating the DDC from one culture to another. Before the conclusion there will be a literature review that looks into how Western and non-Western nations adapt to the DDC.
The key issues of problems surrounding the application of ICT are: privacy, ownership, the responsibility, professionalism, social implications and values. It is beyond doubt that there are benefits of new technologies such as industry development, going to the moon, e- learning systems and improved diagnosis in various fields. Technology is advancing inevitable and with new advancement it creates a vacuum in the new legislation which is not always easy to deal with. The British Computer Society (BCS) and other professional computer organisations such as the Association of Computing Machinery (ACM) recognise the need for today’s graduates to be aware of the issues surrounding the use of computers in all aspects of society. The BCS is committed to raising the awareness of future computing professionals and requires that the social, legal...