Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Justice in sophocles
Strength and weaknesses of socrates
Strength and weaknesses of socrates
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Justice in sophocles
Athens, Greece has been one of the most influential cities for Western culture the world has ever seen. At the forefront of Athens’ resume lie three names: Sophocles, Plato, and Aristotle. Each of these three great philosophers had different ideas on life, wisdom, and the god’s role in everyday affairs, but each significantly influenced Western thought and culture. Sophocles, the first of these philosophers to have lived, was put to death by the state around 400 BC for charges brought against him of corrupting the youth and impiety. He was found guilty and sentenced to death by a group of his piers (vii). However, Sophocles did not commit the crimes the “plaintiffs” claimed he did, therefore rendering a generally just punishment unjust, causing his execution to be the real crime committed.
To examine whether Sophocles violated the laws he has been charged with violating, the charges brought against him must first be examined. The problem with examining these charges is that Sophocles’ and Meletus’ versions differ. In essence, the charges boil down to two things: corrupting the youth of Athens, and impiety. Meletus claims to know “how the young men are being corrupted, and who’s corrupting them” according to Sophocles in Euthyphro (2c, 3-4). The claim is that Sophocles is putting the future of Athens in jeopardy by indoctrinating the future leaders of the city with his “crazy ideas”. Obviously, the current leaders of the city want to stay in power and keep the city running how they like it. This leads them to try and triturate any possible rebellion or drastic change before it takes place. Logically, the place to stop this is with the leader of the group, whom they consider to be Sophocles. This charge of corrupting the youth, wh...
... middle of paper ...
...h is, technically, a fitting punishment for this crime. Drastic measures had to be taken by Athenian officials to ensure the continued success and blessing of their city, and crimes such as these could not be tolerated for fear of how the gods would react to them. The only problem with this punishment is that it was given out in error. Sophocles was not in violation of either of these crimes, and their making an example of him was lost because of the debate over his true guilt. Sophocles cared so deeply about Athens as a whole and her continued wellbeing that instead of easily escaping from jail and or his punishment, he chose to accept the consequences and respect the authority of the city officials in order to maintain the legal system’s integrity in his beloved city. This attitude is the exact opposite of the attitude he had been accused of having towards Athens.
A twenty-first century reading of the Iliad and the Odyssey will highlight a seeming lack of justice: hundreds of men die because of an adulteress, the most honorable characters are killed, the cowards survive, and everyone eventually goes to hell. Due to the difference in the time period, culture, prominent religions and values, the modern idea of justice is much different than that of Greece around 750 B.C. The idea of justice in Virgil’s the Aeneid is easier for us to recognize. As in our own culture, “justice” in the epic is based on a system of punishment for wrongs and rewards for honorable acts. Time and time again, Virgil provides his readers with examples of justice in the lives of his characters. Interestingly, the meaning of justice in the Aeneid transforms when applied to Fate and the actions of the gods. Unlike our modern (American) idea of blind, immutable Justice, the meanings and effects of justice shift, depending on whether its subject is mortal or immortal.
Two ancient examples of disobedient actions come from different ages revered for standards that hold today and provide a basis for modern law; the Greek and ancient Roman empires. From the Greeks, we have come to know the story of Socrates as memorialized by Plato, and the Roman age was the time of Perpetua, an early Christian woman. The fate of those individuals is the same – a death sentence handed down by the society they lived in. Although the conclusion of their respective lives is the same, the differences that lie in the reasoning of their death run deeper, with several key factors impacting their individual destiny. As we will see, these factors affect their relationship to the states and time periods they existed.
For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen and Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society, will help to position Plato's Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.
Woodard, Thomas. Introduction. In Sophocles: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Thomas Woodard. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1966.
Sophocles believed that the individual held the power and the state shouldn’t have total control over an individual. This is hardly a solution to the debate, the fact that everyone dies. Rather, it is a sign that the debate will live on for all of eternity. Beaty, Jerome., et. al.
Due to the structure of said hierarchy, the lawmakers who decide on what laws govern the land are often not the best representatives of how the common people of the given society feel. This notion applies especially in the era of Sophocles, when the lawmakers were noblemen who lived a lifestyle incomparable to that of their subjects and followers. In Sophocles’ play Antigone, Creon, the king, banned the burial of Antigone’s brother Polyneices who he believes is a traitor. Antigone finds this law unjust and proceeds to break it, finding her brother and giving him an honorable burial knowing full well the illegality of her
Socrates reaches a conclusion that defies a common-sense understanding of justice. Nothing about his death sentence “seems” just, but after further consideration, we find that his escape would be as fruitless as his death, and that in some sense, Socrates owes his obedience to whatever orders Athens gives him since he has benefited from his citizenship.
Both these debates have a background question at hand, whether or not the speakers were presenting their opinions out of honest opinion for the well-being of Athens or self-interest. Out of the four speakers two (Nicias and Diodotus) honestly cared for the future of Athens and did not act on the slightest bit for their self-interest. Cleon also cared about the well-being of Athens but merely gave out the immoral and haste answer to a problem that obviously needed more thought to it. Alcibiades stands alone on this one, being the only one to have acted out of self-interest who only spoke to protect his name and gain a few points of honor here and there. Within the same book Thucydides presents two debates that ask the same question of the speakers where the answer apparently depends on the debate and the text.
In this literature review I will discuss both Socrates and Jesus Christ (Jesus). I will compare and distinguish them, by their trial, misdeeds (through the view of society), law, justice and punishment. In addition, I will write about their influence in today’s society and what impact they have made through time. Both Socrates and Jesus had many things in common yet, they we’re different. Both had different religious beliefs. While, Socrates was polytheistic, believing in several gods. Jesus, in the other hand was monotheism, believed in only one God. Both were charged, tried, and executed for their “radical” behavior with society. Overall, both men sacrificed themselves for the possible chance of change.
Thebian play of Antigone has excited many debates over the years. The most prevalent being who exactly could be characterized as the tragic hero in the story. The argument that Antigone is the hero is deffinatly a strong one. There are many critics who believe that Creon, however, is the true protagonist of the play. In order to determine whether or not Creon is the tragic hero one must first examine what a tragic hero is. Aristotle states that a hero is neither purely innocent nor purely malevolent. A hero is usually born into high rank of society, and this person must possess a tragic flaw. This flaw normally stems from either poor judgment or extreme arrogance. This flaw will inevitably contribute to the character's downfall.
Ancient Athens was the site of a growing culture. Philosophy was among the many improvements and discoveries being made. With these improvements and discoveries, great thinkers were able to stretch out their knowledge to new heights. The society they lived in, both welcomed and shunned their ideals. Socrates was one of these thinkers. It was because of Socrates open-mindedness that he was sentenced to death by two charges brought against him. One, Socrates corrupted the youth and two, Socrates believed in ‘false gods’. Yet, was Socrates guilty or not?
Within two classical works of philosophical literature, notions of justice are presented plainly. Plato’s The Republic and Sophocles’ Antigone both address elements of death, tyranny and immorality, morality, and societal roles. These topics are important elements when addressing justice, whether in the societal representation or personal representation.
In Greek tragedy the natural forces are destructive. These forces might be nature, gods or fate. Man is helpless in facing these powers.
In Sophocles’ plays, humans are punished by Gods for the mistakes and unethical acts they
When Socrates was brought to trial for the corruption of the city’s youth he knew he had done nothing wrong. He had lived his life as it should be lead, and did what he ne...