Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Socrates comments on Sophists
Plato views on the sophists
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Socrates comments on Sophists
The vast majority of today's society isn't the slightest bit aware of the tremendous influence the sophistic period of thought has had and continues to have on modern western politics. But how could a supposedly highly educated and intelligent people be so ignorant of such an important and significant epoch in our history? It was during the fifth century B.C. when the sophistic movement, founded by a man named Protagoras, was at its prime. The sophist were recognized as highly skillful teachers by many and their works on issues such as the efficiency of language and the existence of gods were considered to be revolutionary at the time. Not every one was in aggreance with these new philosophies and not long after the movement began, the sophist and their works were being harshly persecuted. Many of them were exhiled and their works were all but completely annihilated. Now, very little is left of the sophists, except for what other prominent theorists have said about them. At the head of this condescending army was Plato, whose own theories opposed those of the sophists in numerable . Anyone who has read some of Plato's writing can tell you that what he had to say about Protagoras, Gorgias, Prodicus and the other sophists was by no means benevolent, and according to G.B. Kerferd, nor was it a completely factual description of them. Unfortunately, since these innacurate depictions are all we have left, the generations that were to come accepted Plato's hostile opinion of the sophists and it is for this reason that the word sophist is now found to be synonomous with the words bigot and know-it-all. Modern scholars have recently been trying to dispell the myths about the sophists, which is exactly what G.B. Kerferd attempts to do in his book 'The Sophistic Movement';.
According to Kerferd, at the foundation of sophistic though is the statement, made by its founder Protagoras, that 'Man is the measure of all things.'; Man considers things to be as they appear to him. To explain this phenomenon, Kerferd makes an example out of the wind. If one man says that the wind is cold, and the man standing beside him finds it to be warm, even if they were both being affected by the same wind, both statements would be considered correct. Since man (the individual) is the measure of all things, the wind is cold to the man to whom it appears cold and warm to the man to whom it appears warm.
In my mind, the name Plato carried an indubitable authority. Despite that, I found myself contradicting his ideas. I completely rejected the idea of an absolute beauty only visible to an elite class of philosophers. When I voiced my opinions, some people nodded along while others pushed back. The instant I moved from disagreeing internally to verbally, I found a type of joy in the back and forth– a joy that came not from my being right, but from learning to defend my ideas and considering those of
The meaning of sophist, is one who used his smarts to later manipulate reality, and Socrates did that, because many young men learned from Socrates, but Socrates later stated that he knew nothing.
Plato and Nietzsche both great philosophers who shaped the narrative of Western philosophy are often appointed to the opposition of each other with Plato setting the scope of the beginning of the era of absolute truth and value, Nietzsche in the other hand presented its death. Plato’s examination of a perfect society led him to believe that knowledge and power must be fused in order to achieve its full potential, while Nietzsche took that tradition and maneuvered it differently to reveal that knowledge is power in a different disguise. In essence we still follow and look back to Nietzsche’s idea of power. With the examination of these two thinkers the extraordinary depth of the two philosophers’ questioning and the difference of their answers lead to the reflection of the structure of philosophical thinking and its continuing importance in shaping how we preserve truth.
Socrates was a traveling teacher and talked and challenged everyone he met. Socrates taught the art of persuasive speaking. He did not charge people money like most of the other Sophists did, but he did have similar beliefs as the Sophists. Sophists thought that our minds are cut off from reality and that we are stuck in our own opinions of what the world was like. Socrates believed that reason or nature could not tell us why the world is the way it appears. The Sophists' point of view is best summed up as this: we can never step out of the way things appear.
After all the readings that we have had and the assignments that were assigned to the readings, one that did stood out the most to me was ”Isocrates, ‘Against the Sophists’”. Isocrates point of view of the sophist was neatly to show that he was against them. Isocrates contends that these sophists, in any case, make guarantees that are difficult to satisfy, saying that they would all be able to however make divine beings out of men. They put on a show to be searchers of reality keeping in mind the end goal to engage individuals, however they don 't really concentrate on it. I will be argue how isocrates criticism about the sophist can now be seen in modern time.
We have two great philosophers, Plato and Aristotle. These are great men, whose ideas have not been forgotten over years. Although their thoughts of politics were similar, we find some discrepancies in their teachings. The ideas stem from Socrates to Plato to Aristotle. Plato based moral knowledge on abstract reason, while Aristotle grounded it on experience and tried to apply it more to concrete living. Both ways of life are well respected by many people today.
Although sophism made an impact on Aristocrats, it did not do the same for the peasants. They believed in putting their faith in God. They chose not to consume their time and energy into sophists because they did not want to hear the logic or reasoning behind sophism. Peasants had a fear that once they started to listen to what sophists had to say, God would no longer answer their prayers (Plutarch, 170).
The new prejudice against Socrates really is because of the Socratic paradox (20c-21a): “he knows nothing and only in this he claims to be wise “ this paradox aroused hatred against him (21b, 23ab), even though he explains that the knowledge of his ignorance lead to his philosophical mission in life .his mission to question and to seek “the unexamined life is no life for a man”(21c-23c) this is explained by Chaerephon's enquiry at Apollo's oracle at Delphi declaring Socrates the wisest of men (21b-) Socrates turns this philosophical interrogation into his philosophical purpose ,as a consequence the young followed him trying to copy his questions to their leaders (23c) this arose the charge of corrupting the youth ( 23d) since like Socrates, they also questioned the leaders of democracy and religion, claiming not to believe in the gods and discover the heavens (d) .
The Greek's notion of rational thought is a very strong reason why Western Civilization has become so influential in the world today. During their time, the Greeks spurred an intellectual revolution. They questioned the meanings of life and began using their minds to expand the world. According to Glenn Blackburn: "In many ways, they "discovered" the human "mind" through their philosophy and rational thought [ . . . ]"(64). Their "opening" of the mind influenced all ways of life and society. Major ideas blossomed like politics, governing laws, literature, art, history, and new inventions. Scientific thinking was groundbreaking among Greek minds. Ideas of mathematics, astronomy, architecture, and anatomy engrossed the public. This revolution of rational thought dominated society and began a transition in Western Civilization because people began using reason to explain human and natural events, rather than the gods (Blackburn, 67). Even today, rational thought is used by all of us and continues to influence society. The power of the modern mind has proved greater than any other Greek could have ever expected.
There are numerous differences between Socrates and Sophistry, the main one being that the Sophists were well known teachers that were paid for their knowledge and Socrates simply was not. Socrates shared what he knew with others and learned what he did not through the dialectic conversations he would have. Another difference is the Sophists would argue with the mind set of winning in the end, while Socrates was looking to “advance toward truth” (Melchert 65). Though they had some similarities, Socrates and the Sophists were ultimately different in their beliefs and
Greek philosophers Aristotle and Plato were two of the most influential and knowledgeable ancients in our history. Their contributions and dedication to science, language and politics are immensely valued centuries later. But while the two are highly praised for their works, they viewed several subjects entirely differently, particularly education practices, and human ethics and virtue.
Plato believed that a person must search for the good in all things to clearly view the good, through contemplation a person is to understand the existence of the good. Through searching a person would then understand the extent of the good, according to Plato the good is embedded within everything, whether it be the simplicity of nature or the abstract life within society. Protagoras did not search, but instead questioned the idea of good and evil. Due to Protagoras being a sophist, he would naturally question all ideas before deciding they were truth. This is evident in his approach in understanding the good and finding it. Protagoras stressed that although all views may appear equally true, they are not of equal importance and truth. One view may be advantageous to the person who has it, while the perception of another may prove harmful. Protagoras believed that the sophist was there to teach the student how to decide between them and therefore he put a large emphasis on questioning everything. This was the same in how he viewed the good, constantly questioning if something was good or evil. This is simaliar to Plato’s belief in searching for the good everywhere, Protagoras instead questioned whether something was good and evil everywhere, still
Being criticized is one of the hardest things to accept as a thinker or scientist. Academic criticism questions the very premise of one’s idea, theory or hypothesis. It this openness to criticism that the Athenians show in The Symposium that show the true nature of these men. All of these men are well educated, well spoken and present well thought out ideas. The are most likely highly respected men in the community and must take some pride in their abilities. However, there is an uncanny acceptance to criticism from their peers that proves these men prioritize logic and reason over their own personal pride. An examples of this is seen when Eryximachus says to Aristophanes, “ Indeed, I am not going to attack you for I thought your speech was charming” (Burger 108). This quote displays the Athenians be able to admit they were wrong, and were able to change their views if presented with new, logical information. This is a key element in a sophisticated and accomplished intellectual community. It is at the very core of academic thinking to question and provide answers that logically explain why. If new evidence is presented, a good intellectual will change his answer to re explain this new information or question. However, in The Symposium, the reader must be careful not to use this text as a historical record of who the smartest Athenian was. Plato of student of Socrates, could have potential a large bias for his former teacher and could paint him a brighter light than might be historically accurate. It is important to understand the significance of others openness to criticism but not necessarily that Socrates was the superior intellectual of his time, just because he is the last to speak and receives very little
In Plato’s The Republic, the primary focus for a significant portion of the text is establishing the ideal state in order to determine the nature of justice and virtue. In doing so, Socrates, who is the primary speaker in the text, determines several requirements for the existence of the ideal state. The third requirement according to Socrates is that philosophers must rule as kings (or kings must adequately philosophize). Until this occurs, “cities will have no rest from evils” (473d). However, there is some objection, or anticipated objection, to Socrates’ requirement. Adeimantus, one of Socrates interlocutors in The Republic, raises the objection that those who actively philosophize into adulthood are made up of a great number of cranks and,
Finally, the theory of Ideas reaches new height in the Sophists. The theory of Ideas in this work is a new concept because he redefines and extends it. The Sophist presents that there are hierarchy of Ideas and the whole complex of Ideas in defining the meaning of Sophistry. There are five categories of the sophist: motion and rest, sameness, difference, being, and non-being. Plato uses logos to define the meaning of each of the categories in which the being is dynamic and there is relationship among them which unity is important.