Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sigmund Freud and Friedrich Nietzsche
Sigmund freud beliefs psychology
Sigmund freud beliefs psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Daniel Farrell is a former Catholic who had left the seminary because he stopped believing in God. In his essay, “Life without God: Some Personal Costs,” Daniel Farrell discusses what it means to be an atheist to him and the results of losing his faith in God. He also tries to answer two questions which are “why is the world not enough for some of us” and “what does believing in God do to mitigate this sense of the world’s not being enough on its own?” (63). While reading his essay, one can find connections between his ideas with ideas from Sigmund Freud and Friedrich Nietzsche. Daniel Farrell spent six years of his young life in a seminary. At the age of nineteen, Farrell left the seminary because he had stopped believing in God, which resulted …show more content…
For example, not hurting anyone and treating others fairly comes as what appears to be an objective value for myself, but why? According to Farrell, this is because the society I’ve been raised in (following Christian tradition), says this is objectively good according to god. John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism, has interesting ideas on this in the fact that his definition of conscience is defined by what society overall teaches us at its base. However, at the same time I might see smaller issues as subjectively different than what society sees as a whole. I might not advocate consumerism or eating meat, but purely because I choose not to. This creates an interesting discussion in opposition to Farrell’s argument concerning the true value of certain things religion teaches us and our ability to pick and choose beliefs. Perhaps it is not all bad that one follow basic religious beliefs as they seem to lead to a point society is comfortable with, but at the same time as Farrell seems to say it is extremely important to have subjective values and feelings rather than just blindly following what “advisers” and religion tell us to do, lest we end up in the seminary for six years and ultimately decide it is not for
Everything you see is and takes up matter. Rather it’s in your head, in person, in thought, in imagination, its all matter. And it matters. Without a god in someone’s life, people feel that they do not have to feel guilty. People feel guilty when they have a god because they have rules to go by and when they break them they feel bad, or guilty. In the book the author quotes, “What does it profit a man to gain the whole world but loose his own soul?”
On Binx’s way to his aunt’s house, “the idea of a search occurs to” him (13). “The search is what anyone would undertake if he were not sunk in the everydayness of his own life. To become aware of the possibility of the search is to be onto something” (13). But what exactly is Binx onto? Binx doesn’t know and doesn’t reveal the purpose of his search because he fears “exposing (his) own ignorance” (14). Is this search about God? Binx “hesitates to answer, since all other Americans have settled the matter for themselves and to give such an answer would amount to setting himself a goal which everyone else has reached – and therefore raising a question in which no one has the slightest interest. For, as everyone knows, the polls report that 98% of Americans believe in God and the remaining 2% are atheists and agnostics – which leaves not a single percentage point for a seeker” (13, 14).
In 2002, Doctor Armand Nicholi, Jr. sought to put two of the greatest minds of the 20th century together to debate the answer to the lifelong question, “Is there a God, and if so, how should we respond to his existence?” Nicholi is the first scholar to ever put the arguments of C.S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud side by side in an attempt to recreate as realistic of a debate as possible between the two men. He examines their writings, letters, and lectures in an attempt to accurately represent both men in this debate. His result, the nearly 300 page book, The Question of God: C.S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud Debate God, Love, Sex, and the Meaning of Life, is one of the most comprehensive, well researched, and unbiased summaries of the debate between the worldviews of “believer and unbeliever” (Pg. 5).
In this short reflection paper I will be comparing the movie, “The Brook Ellison Story” and the book, “The Book of Job.” Both of these magnificent stories are highly respected by the public and they both give wonderful example of M.R. DeHann book, The Broken thing: Why we suffer. Some of the things that will be disgusting in this paper is a summary of both of these wonderful stories, how four out of the seven main questions for my search for meaning class best relates to both of these stories, which three out of ten “Key Principles of Catholic Social Teachings” closely relate to the two stories, and how both of these stories answer the question, “Does God Exist?” which is a popular fundamental question that was asked frequently in Agbonkhianmeghe Orobator book, Theology: Brewed in an African Pot.
In the face of conflict and evil, it is often difficult to know what path to take. Yet, it is exactly during these moments when one is confronted with the most important questions and decisions in life, those which will eventually influence not only oneself but the rest of the world. In the documentary film Bonhoeffer, we learn about the life of German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer who, witnessing the injustice against humanity, courageously opposed Adolf Hitler. With strong morals, Bonhoeffer became a conspirator against the crimes of the Nazi regime as he was able to understand the world through the eyes of Christ. His passion and commitment to God grew out of a personal struggle when his brother died in World War I. As he found himself in contact with the reality of death, he grappled with questions which encouraged him to explore God and religion in a deeper way so he decided to study theology at the University of Berlin. It was here that Bonhoeffer started to discover axiology and epistemology and looked for answers to questions about the nature of human knowledge and the moral dilemmas of right and wrong. As he built a stronger sense of faith, God became the answer to his questions and the fuel of his actions. By integrating aesthetic elements, illustrating political realities, and challenging ideas of justice and ethics, this movie takes the viewer on a journey to explore Bonhoeffer’s life and the powerful influence he had on the world.
Smith, Andrew. "Chapter Nine: Life After Death." 2014. A Secular View of God. 12 May 2014 .
In the first two chapter of the book, Freud explores a possible source of religious feeling. He describes an “oceanic feeling of wholeness, limitlessness, and eternity.” Freud himself is unable to experience such a feeling, but notes that there do indeed...
Craig, W. L. (2008). The Absurdity of Life without God. In Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics, 3rd Ed. (pp. 71-90). Wheaton: Crossway Books.
whether life without religion is bound to lack some dimension,” (Kauffman, p. 32). In a
Religion is an organized collection of beliefs and cultural systems that entail the worship of a supernatural and metaphysical being. “Religion just like other belief systems, when held onto so much, can stop one from making significant progress in life”. Together with religion come traditions that provide the people with ways to tackle life’s complexities. A subscription to the school of thought of great scholars
Erich Fromm in his psychoanalytical approach to religion is distinct from the earlier works of Sigmund Freud. Fromm defines religion as “any system of thought and action shared by a group which gives the individual a frame of orientation and an object of devotion.” Fromm argues that irreligious systems including all the different kinds of idealism and “private” religions deserve being defined as a “religion.” Based on Fromm’s theory, it is explained that there is no human being who does not have a “religious need,” almost every part of human life reflects religious need and its fulfillment, in fact he states it to be “inherent” in man.
“Is man merely a mistake of God’s? Or God merely a mistake of man?” These words spoken by Friedrich Nietzsche, the late 19th-century German philosopher who challenged the foundations of Christianity and traditional beliefs of morality, are central to the ages-old discussion; are atheists less moral than theists? While theists place their faith into the hands of an almighty being, atheists place their faith into their own hands. Contrary to popular belief, atheists are not devil-worshipping thugs who corrupt our cities, but are ordinary people, just like you, with many of the same morals and values.
In her youth, George Eliot followed her family’s evangelism. However, “she gave up her faith due to her studies in science and in the German ‘higher criticism’ of the bible, which examined it as a historical rather than a sacred text” (Maitzen, 2012). Besides, she studied Feuerbachian philosophy, which reinforced her new religion view. As Feuerbach, Eliot thought that ‘God’ was not an external being but a projection of our best qualities. Feuerbach argued that “Religion is the relation of man to his own, but regarded as another nature, separate, nay, contradistinguished diction to reason and morality; herein lies the noxious source of religion fanaticism, the chief metaphysical principle of human sacrifices, in a word, the prima materia of all the atrocities, all the horrible scenes, in the tragedy of religious history” (Essence of Christianity). Thus, according to them, God is the element that breaks the natural flue of religion towards goodness, and fo...
In today’s modern western society, it has become increasingly popular to not identify with any religion, namely Christianity. The outlook that people have today on the existence of God and the role that He plays in our world has changed drastically since the Enlightenment Period. Many look solely to the concept of reason, or the phenomenon that allows human beings to use their senses to draw conclusions about the world around them, to try and understand the environment that they live in. However, there are some that look to faith, or the concept of believing in a higher power as the reason for our existence. Being that this is a fundamental issue for humanity, there have been many attempts to explain what role each concept plays. It is my belief that faith and reason are both needed to gain knowledge for three reasons: first, both concepts coexist with one another; second, each deals with separate realms of reality, and third, one without the other can lead to cases of extremism.
Or so I imagined. One opinion had stayed constant, however, a state of unease about life in general. I started to question existence itself. Being an atheist did not help. How can life have any meaning if there is no God? I want to believe in a meaningful life, but it is hard to find a reason. It is my view that most people need faith because facing the other, possible reality of a meaningless life is too painful to acknowledge. In other words, “important realities are often the ones that are hardest to see and talk about (Wallace, 1).” But, alas, religious zealots might be onto something. In my view, aside from the absurdity of believing in a divinity that had no real, concrete evidence, I realize some of these religious people surely questioned their faith at one point and still choose to continue in their beliefs. Now, I don’t think I’ll jump in my car and drive to a church in hopes of finding the meaning of life. But, I know that I have that choice. I have the free will to see life how I want to see it. That is