Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the meaningless of life
Religion and the meaning of life
Religion and the meaning of life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on the meaningless of life
Imagine a game of chess: there are pieces, players, and a board. What controls how the game plays out? The players do, not the board or the pieces. For most of my life, I was not the player; I was the piece. The choice to do what I want was not a viable option for my past self. That changed, however. Wallace’s commencement speech explores freedom and default thinking. Freedom is a construct of the mind; to actualize it, one must believe in the choice of free will.
After reading Wallace’s speech, I realized that it affected me greatly due to it’s familiarity. Mainly, because it implies that life is meaningless, reminding me all too well of my past. I became aware of the possibility of the meaningless of life at a young, vulnerable age, specifically
…show more content…
Or so I imagined. One opinion had stayed constant, however, a state of unease about life in general. I started to question existence itself. Being an atheist did not help. How can life have any meaning if there is no God? I want to believe in a meaningful life, but it is hard to find a reason. It is my view that most people need faith because facing the other, possible reality of a meaningless life is too painful to acknowledge. In other words, “important realities are often the ones that are hardest to see and talk about (Wallace, 1).” But, alas, religious zealots might be onto something. In my view, aside from the absurdity of believing in a divinity that had no real, concrete evidence, I realize some of these religious people surely questioned their faith at one point and still choose to continue in their beliefs. Now, I don’t think I’ll jump in my car and drive to a church in hopes of finding the meaning of life. But, I know that I have that choice. I have the free will to see life how I want to see it. That is …show more content…
I see what the latest problem is on the news, the advertisements that imply how you should live your life, and the laws upon laws that bind us to the “justice” system. Before, as a Marine, I supposedly had protected freedom during deployments only to return, to the land of the free, to witness the sad truth that we are not as liberated as we think we are because of society’s expectations restraining us. Our nation was built on the premise that all humans have “unalienable rights”: Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness are the main ones. Looking around, I do not recognize people that are unrestricted. Debt, mortgages, loans, etc. control how we live our lives; I, too, am not exempt from these binds. It is plain to take in that I am restricted so long as I am tied to these superficial means of
It is common for human beings, as a race, to fall into the comforts of routine – living each day similar to days before and days to come. Unfortunately, it is often too late before one even realizes that they have fallen into this mundane way of living in which each day is completed rather than lived, as explained by David Foster Wallace in “This Is Water”. This commencement speech warned graduating students of the dangers of submitting to our “default settings” of unconscious decisions and beliefs (Wallace 234). However, this dangerous way of living is no new disability of today’s human race. Socrates warned the people of his time: “A life unaware is a life not worth living” and who is to say he wasn’t completely right? A topic of long debate also includes the kind of influence that consciously-controlled thoughts can have on the physical body. A year after Wallace’s speech, neurobiologist Helen Pilcher, published “The New Witch Doctor: How Belief Can Kill”, which explains the influence of the mind and individual beliefs on the quality of one’s life. Together, both authors illustrate how detrimental a life lived unaware of one’s own thoughts and beliefs can be on the body and spirit. And though it is easy to live by
The speech is arranged into short paragraphs, providing an example in almost every one. Everyone is familiar with commencement speeches. They are usually used to congratulate a group of people and tend to be looking towards the future. Instead of congratulating the students at Kenyon College, Wallace challenges them. The essay opens with a metaphor about two young fish that do not realize what water is, setting the tone for the rest of the speech. Wallace proceeds to describe how completely oblivious society is to the world around us, just like the fish. Wallace supports this claim through examples within the speech. His use of examples rather than facts or statistics weakens his claim. If more facts or statistics were used his claim would become more convincing. His rationalization come in the form of the short stories that illustrate the choices people make in their everyday lives. He...
The controversial topic involving the existence of God has been the pinnacle of endless discourse surrounding the concept of religion in the field of philosophy. However, two arguments proclaim themselves to be the “better” way of justifying the existence of God: The Cosmological Argument and the Mystical Argument. While both arguments attempt to enforce strict modus operandi of solidified reasoning, neither prove to be a better way of explaining the existence of God. The downfall of both these arguments rests on commitment of fallacies and lack of sufficient evidence, as a result sabotaging their validity in the field of philosophy and faith.
In This is Water, Wallace effectively uses logical reasoning and the parable of the religious man and the atheist man to explain how consciousness is a choice, not an unalterable state. To do this, Wallace states that in many cases, “A huge percentage of the stuff that I tend to be automatically certain of is, it turns out, totally wrong and deluded.” Using logical reasoning, Wallace’s own admission reminds his audience that they are also often wrong, as, logically, humans are not perfect and make periodic mistakes. Once he establishes that people can be wrong, he returns to the parable of the two men and claims “…the exact same experience can mean two totally different things to two different people, given those people's two different belief templates and two different ways of constructing meaning from experience.” This idea is familiar to his educated audience, as he claims it is one of the primary foundations of a liberal arts education. Thus, Wallace uses his audienc...
Wallace stresses the idea that all people really can think about in their day to day lives is themselves. To explain this Wallace uses the story of people in rush-hour trying to shop at the grocery store and getting aggravated when there aren’t enough registers open to check out their purchases. He uses this example to describe how people make themselves the center of the universe and how their own needs should be met before anyone else’s own. Wallace is trying to describe how higher education helps people think more clearly, and how the knowledge obtained also helps to make your mind more capable of evaluating situations and how they affect more than just one’s own
Everyday we have the chance to make her own opinions and give reason to our own voice. We have the chance to live in a country that encourages freedom in society, which separate ourselves from any restrictions imposed upon by authority, actions or any political views. liberty is the power we possess to act as we please through freedom and independence. But what happens when we choose to give away our basic liberties for temporary safety? Benjamin Franklin once stated, “They who give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Those who decide to give away their personal freedoms for something that is temporary do not see the value in the long-lasting gift called freedom. In
Similarly, in This is Water, David Foster Wallace argues a real education as offering people the choice of what to think about in life. He states that “a liberal arts education is not so much about filling you up with knowledge as it is about ‘teaching you how to think’, but rather about the choice of what to think about” (1). After getting educated, students obtain the basic knowledge among many subjects, but with all the information and facts being offered, people may lose conscious of what to think about. Schooling may cause students over-think things which are unnecessary because it may take over what you actually notice and care. Wallace insists “learning how to think really means learning how to exercise some control over how and
Wallace informs us that we should “learn how to think.” By this he means that we have to be conscious and aware enough to choose what to pay attention to daily. Also, that we ought
When the fictional character Loonquawl was told that the answer to “Life, the Universe and Everything” was a very simple “forty-two,” he was, to put it mildly, upset, especially seeing as the computer, Deep Thought, had taken seven and a half million years to compute it. When asked if forty-two was definitely the answer, Deep Thought replies, “I checked it very thoroughly, and that quite definitely is the answer. I think the problem, to be quite honest with you, is that you’ve never actually known what the question is” (Adams 1997, 162). This situation in Douglas Adams’ The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy throws a humorous light on humanity’s tendency to just want answers without perhaps fully understanding the scope of the question. Everyone, at some point in their life, might consider “What is the answer to Life?” And if Life is what we experience as humans, then we can also pose, “What does it mean to be human?” Teenagers in existential crisis, ancient Greek philosophers and middle-aged grocery baggers can all identify with the desire for an answer to that question. People come up with various ways and means to find this elusive answer. Some might look to the human experience and try to use philosophy (and perhaps thus end up as grocery baggers). On the other hand, some may instead turn to the exact opposite of “human”: the divine. Many religions propose to have found the answer of what it means to be human through knowledge and experience of the divine. Christianity, in particular, has been grappling with this question ever since the birth and death of a man named Jesus, who was reported to be, in various ways, the very presence of divinity on Earth. Unfortunately, the majority of any “official grappling” in Christianity has ...
23. Why is it important to make a decision about whether to believe or not believe in God? Why is a belief in a merely good life not sufficient to give us real meaning?
Davis Foster Wallace on his commencement speech “This Is Water” at Kenyon College in 2005, delivers a life lesson arguing that our default thinking is that we are the center of the world. David Foster Wallace on his speech “This Is Water” at Kenyon College in 2005, deliver a different kind of commencement; he delivers a life listen speech arguing that people should learn something important which is choosing what to think. He tries to deliver his message by starting with a short story about three fishes; one of them is a wise old fish that asking the other young two how the water is, but the two young fishes don’t understand the question! In this story, the two young fishes are typical unthinking people, and the water represent what is surrounding us. He tries to show that most of us don’t really know what’s going around us because this is one thing of our default thinking; we
This Is sown by telling stories. While it may put you in a better mental state if you tell yourself that the guy who cut you off on the highway could be rushing his kid to the hospital, which would mean, in Wallace’s words, “he’s in a bigger, more legitimate hurry than I am: it is actually I who am in HIS way,” what if they aren’t? What if that guy who cuts you off on the highway really is just being a jerk? If you force yourself to believe otherwise, can that still be considered a genuine or appropriate interpretation and response?He argues that the ability to choose what to think and how to perceive, coupled with an allergy to the automatic responses to our daily annoyances, inform the sympathy and awareness that are the purpose of a quality education. The main message from the speech to me is the way he can look past things and come to conclusion within himself. David Foster Lewis says “The really important kind of freedom involves attention, and awareness, and discipline, and effort, and being able truly to care about other people and to sacrifice for them, over and over, in myriad petty little unsexy ways, every day.” This quote really explains how people get so caught up in
American freedom has faced many tribulations, especially throughout the slavery, segregation, and women’s suffrage eras. However, the ideological belief of individual freedom has always triumphed. From when the first Pilgrim stepped onto American soil to the present day America has been run by a democracy and the freedom that system of government allows its peoples to have. “Americans share a common identity grounded in the freedom — consistent always with respecting the freedom of others — to live as they choose” (Friedman).
In today’s modern western society, it has become increasingly popular to not identify with any religion, namely Christianity. The outlook that people have today on the existence of God and the role that He plays in our world has changed drastically since the Enlightenment Period. Many look solely to the concept of reason, or the phenomenon that allows human beings to use their senses to draw conclusions about the world around them, to try and understand the environment that they live in. However, there are some that look to faith, or the concept of believing in a higher power as the reason for our existence. Being that this is a fundamental issue for humanity, there have been many attempts to explain what role each concept plays. It is my belief that faith and reason are both needed to gain knowledge for three reasons: first, both concepts coexist with one another; second, each deals with separate realms of reality, and third, one without the other can lead to cases of extremism.
Lonegran states that being human means having an unlimited number of questions regarding life and the universe; in order to answer these questions many turn to religion. Religion has traditionally been a major force in humanity’s search for meaning. Religi...