Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Principles of the christian religion
Principles of the christian religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
BOOK I. RIGHT AND WRONG AS A CLUE TO THE MEANING OF THE UNIVERSE
1. Explain what Lewis means by the “Law of Nature” or the “Law of Human Nature.”
Lewis means that the “Law of Nature” implies humans’ natural choices. He implies that many people today perceive the Law of Nature as gravity or other scientific option which is non-negotiable; however, Lewis states that the “Law of Nature” that he is speaking of implies a negotiable topic. One may choose to follow it or to not follow it.
2. When people are quarreling, to what are they appealing when they say, “How’d you like it if someone did the same thing to you?” (p. 3)
They are appealing to a standard of behaviour that many people require others to follow. When people are fighting, they
…show more content…
By comparing, we are making morality reformed. Measuring people by the standard of morality is judging a person on their ability to conform to the perception of a perfect morality. Everyone’s truth is different in their eyes; therefore, people’s truths make others suspect each other. They are not observing what is opinion and fact. Comparing moralities advances our knowledge of morality in the Law of Human Nature.
5. Explain the difference between the Law of Human Nature and physical laws.
The difference between the Law of Human Nature and physical laws is that the Law of Human Nature implies a standard of behaviour that should be obvious to everyone and teaches the correct attitude and interactions between humans. The Law of Human Nature is that of right and wrong. Many people have different views of what is right and what is wrong which is what differs between this and physical laws. Physical laws are referring to things such as gravity that is the same everywhere and it not able to be known any other way.
6. Explain the materialist
…show more content…
What are the three things that spread the Christ-life to us? Do you find it interesting that a non-Catholic would say this? Why or why not?
Three things that spread the Christ-life to us are through baptism, belief, and Holy Communion. Yes I think it is interesting that a non-Catholic would say this because these three things consist of two of the sacraments of Catholic religion.
23. Why is it important to make a decision about whether to believe or not believe in God? Why is a belief in a merely good life not sufficient to give us real meaning?
It is important because of authority. Without specific beliefs, we are not giving authority to anyone who has proven or also believes in such things as God and religious beliefs that follow the authority of God.
BOOK III. CHRISTIAN BEHAVIOR
24. How does the schoolboy perceive God? Is this your perception? Why or why not?
The schoolboy perceives God like a person who is snooping in other people’s business and trying to stop them from being happy. No this is not my perception because God is helping us be happy everyday with everything He has given
these terrible events happen to him and even starts to question if God is even real. “For the first
St Paul of Tarsus is a model for all Christians as he made Christianity accessible to the whole world, and set it on its path to becoming a global religion by writing much of the Christian Theology that still forms the foundations of Christian beliefs, teachings and community that exists today. Paul established the Eucharist as the principle ritual for Christians, and discussed the appropriate manner by which this ritual is to be celebrated. “For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes. So then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord.” (1 Corinthians 11:26-27) The belief and teachings of the Eucharist allowed and continues to allow adherents to be brought closer to God by enabling them to give thanks, and be brought closer to ...
While maintaining a open look of this moral law, Lewis presents two objections one would present to the moral law: “The moral law is just herd instinct” and “Morality is just social convention. The moral law is not a herd instinct due to man’s choice to suppress stronger instincts in fa...
Natural law is a natural sense of what is right and wrong. Natural Law Theory states that laws are rational standards. Thomas Aquinas talked a lot about Natural Law Theory
In When Bad Things Happen to Good People, Harold Kushner, a Rabbi, provides the reader with multiple thought provoking stories. Although it is his own book, it has little to do with Kushner himself. He, like many others, has experienced loss and began to question his belief in God. If God is the almighty figure many make him out to be, why would he cause harm to his faithful followers? Kushner asks the questions many are afraid and refuse to ask, and he helps guide others who have experienced such trouble as well.
Clearly, he sees the evils that he has suffered as part of a larger plan; furthermore, he attributes good fortune and punishment to the work of God and in my opinion, he sees God using him for a much greater purpose.
...fighting his feelings about not seeing Jesus. He feels that he is lying to God and himself by getting up and being saved even though he cannot see Jesus. Even though the reader knows that he truly is being saved from sin. He is doing something good for himself. Therefore, we can see that he truly does not understand the meaning of God. He is a child on the verge of adulthood. He has every right to be confused and misinterpret religion because he is learning. Religion is metaphorical and imaginative; it is what you believe it to be.
There were a few quotes throughout the chapter that I found to be interesting. The first one being “Our bodies and our brains are composed of atoms, and like everything else composed of atoms, they are subject to the laws of physics. And we, of course, have no control over the laws
who runs into some issues and takes the unmoral path, struggles with his idea of god throughout the entire movie. The other poignant character played by Woody Allen, is Cliff Stern whom is an aspiring documentary director making his masterpiece about a philosopher who seems very optimistic about life and acts as a commentator throughout the movie. The final analysis of god comes in the end when these two charters finally meet at a party and discuss Judah difficulties. Though the views of god flip flop throughout the movie at the end it is obvious that Judah has lost all faith in god in this world and Cliff believes in a just universe where wrongs burden the wrongdoers forever. The comments Cliff makes would seem to indicate that god is present in our lives through our conscious; however, Judah has lived through the worst with little consequences and now back to his life implying that god is simply a watcher of this world and doe not interact with it. The movie implies that though are perception of god may shift through life eventually we are left with nothing in term of a diety.
Hume contends that all human behavior is predictable given certain circumstances. Every nation, in any period of time, will have citizens that will act in a similar fashion to other nations, in any other period of time (53). Hume supports this idea by asserting that this is why the philosophy of human nature is possible. Spinoza has similar ideas about behavior but is more thorough in his analysis. Spinoza begins his critique from a naturalistic approach. He believes that the universal laws of nature give us an understanding of affects. Affects such as hate, anger, love, lust, happiness, and joy are all determined by nature. It is nature that affects the individual, not the individual affecting nature. Thus, nature affects everyone in a similar fashion and gives rise to similar ideas and feelings. From a naturalist perspective, the laws of nature can help understand the laws that govern
Lewis uses the example of a man paying taxes. He states, “he pays them all right, but he does hope that there will be enough left over for him to live on,” (196).
Taylor believes that if one concedes and accepts the first three components then acceptance of the fourth component is not unreasonable. He also suggests that in order to adopt the attitude of respect for nature one must accept all four elements of the biocentric outlook. “Once we reject the claim that humans are superior either in merit or in worth to other living things, we are ready to adopt the attitude of respect. The denial of human superiority is itself the result of taking the perspective on nature built into the first three elements of the biocentric outlook” (Taylor 153). This is where Taylor is mistaken. I will argue in the subsequent paper that humans, as a condition of moral agency, are superior to other living things and that one does not need to accept Taylor’s fourth element in order to adopt the attitude of respect for nature.
Here in the US we have several different religions being practiced everyday: like Zoroastrianism, Shinto, Muslim, Buddhism, Hinduism, and as well as Judaism and Christianity and even newer beliefs like scientology. Religion is a very important thing to people because it helps us find answers to some very difficult questions, namely what are we and why are we here. This is very important itself because knowing who we are is the basis of our beliefs and the foundation to everything that we do. (Neusner, 2009)
The second law of nature is derived directly from the first. It insists that man lay down his right to all things; and be contented with so much liberty against other men, as he would allow other men liberty against himself,” (Leviathan 1, 14). Essentially, in the state of nature, a man has a right to all things. By following this second law of nature, a man gives up certain rights in hopes that other men do the same in pursuit of peace with one another.
This passage captures the essence of how the average religious person views atheism. Atheism is probably the least popular and least understood philosophical position in America today. It is often approached with fear and mistrust, as if one were about to investigate a doctrine that advocates a ...