More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of some lessons from the assembly line
Analysis of some lessons from the assembly line
Importance of education to the youth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
With all things considered, I believe my critical analysis essay will most benefit a young adult audience; more specifically, high school seniors. These individuals will soon enter the “real world”. Some of these students may be working in places; such as, fast food restaurants, retail or grocery stores, etc. However, an individual’s education level; essentially, determines his or her place in life. Therefore, with a clearer understanding of “Some Lessons From the Assembly Line” some may decide to further their education beyond high school. I had to read my selected article twice before I discovered the author’s purpose. He contradicts himself multiple times; therefore, his main point is somewhat hidden. Each time an individual reads a piece
Often times the message of an article gets muddled to the reader depending on the stylistic manner of the author’s writing. The style in which the author uses to write, Am I Still Here?, takes away from the actual message of the article. The author, Anthony Doerr(‘)s, uses very descriptive language which is distracting to the reader. Also, the use of metaphors can deem challenging for the reader to understand the true meaning behind the article. Finally, the use of complicated diction makes it arduous to understand what the article is attempting to get across. The stylistic choices that the author uses takes away from the message of the article.
He too quickly dismisses the idea of reading on your own to find meaning and think critically about a book. For him, Graff states that “It was through exposure to such critical reading and discussion over a period of time that I came to catch the literary bug.” (26) While this may have worked for Graff, not all students will “experience a personal reaction” (27) through the use of critical discussion. The solution to this seems to be neither giving away answers or lazily doing assigned reading in order to find meaning within the text.
Imagine being employee number 101 out of 1001. Now imagine working on an assembly line in a hot room filled with 1000 other women frantically assembling products for first world countries to use for ten seconds before discarding for a newer version. This job pays enough for you to get by but living in a third world country with low pay isn’t easy. What many people don’t understand is that the cost of production in a third world country is more inexpensive than it is in America. Hiring women to work in horrid conditions decreases employee loss because they are not rambunctious like men. “Life on the Global Assembly Line” by Barbara Ehrenreich and Annette Fuentes clearly illustrates the hardships women go through for U.S. corporation production. Corporate powers have resorted to building production plants in third world countries to save money. U.S. corporate powers take advantage of third world
In Andrew Braaksma 's essay Some Lessons From The Assembly Line he provides the perspective of a college student learning life lessons from his summer job in a factory and how it showed him not to take his ability to have a higher education for granted. While most students never give it a second thought about not going to college, Braaksma learned from the hard work and low pay to appreciate the opportunities he has. Most college age students have never experienced the struggles of what real life can throw at them. Long hours with low wages, the physically taxing nature of some of these jobs and lack of job security. Having myself worked construction jobs for many years before going back to college his essay could prove invaluable to many students.
to read most of the text in order for us to understand the events of
Murray, Charles. ""What's Wrong with Vocational School?"." Practical Argument: A Text and Anthology. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2011. 631-634. Print.
It is fascinating to me to read the articles “Why I Write,” by George Orwell and Joan Didion. These authors touch on so many different topics for their reasons to writing. Their ideals are very much different, but their end results are the same, words on paper for people to read. Both authors made very descriptive points to how their minds wander on and off their writings while trying to write. They both often were writing about what they didn’t want to write about before they actually wrote what they wanted too. In George Orwell’s case, he wrote many things when he was young the he himself would laugh at today, or felt was unprofessional the but if he hadn’t done so he would not of been the writer he became. In Joan Didion’s case she would often be daydreaming about subjects that had nothing to do with what she intended on writing. Her style of writing in this article is actually more interesting because of this. Her mind wandering all over on many different subjects to how her writing came to her is very interesting for a person like me to read. My mind is also very restless on many different unneeded topics before I actually figure some sort of combined way to put words on to paper for people to read. Each author put down in their articles many ways of how there minds work while figuring out what they are going to write about. Both of the authors ended ...
The first question to ask when you read an article is the one with the most obvious answer: “Who wrote this?” This is the rhetor, and it has two parts: the author, the one who actually sat down to write the piece and whose name’s at the top of the page; and the others, those that helped the author by adding to their argument through evidence or support (Grant-Davie 269). As high school students preparing to enter the wonderful world of college research papers, it’s important to understand who’s making the points you reference in your own work, and you can do that by analyzing the rhetors. An exam...
...oached. Such as: how the reader is seen as having so many roles, and to which one do they take. This article is well- written and he has some significant points about the novel. Sommer’s tactics of constructing his argument in a logical manner was the right thing to do. It helps the reader to separate their feelings that they may have had when reading the novel, and look at facts. In some parts of the article he used reader-response, which helped you to question what others have said about this novel. Although there were parts where his argument is not clear, it did consist of some valid points.
"Some Lessons from the Assembly Line" is a personal narrative written by Andrew Braaksma. The author speaks about the risks and struggles individuals face when choosing a blue-collar career. The author vaguely speaks about taking his education for granted before he realized how lucky he had been to receive one, to begin with, and what his life would be like without higher education. Being a single mother, and a young woman, who lives in a small town made up of mostly blue-collar careers I can relate to the importance of the author's purpose. The author's purpose for writing this piece of work is to inform his audience about the value of higher education; since without education beyond high school, an individual must depend on careers that require an
Murray, Charles. “What’s wrong with Vocational School?” Practical Argument. Ed. Lauren G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2011. Pg. 632. Print.
Dr. Satler’s comments: This student’s paper displays the radiance of writing kindled by discriminating reading. His careful attention to words and their subtle tones in context translate into interpretive language that clarifies the subtle shapes of meaning.
The heuristic function of the epigraph may seem relatively simple when looking at a journal article that begins w...
When dissecting Adler’s testimony concerning the profits readers gain when thoroughly annotating a piece of literature, I found myself persuaded to look at each detail of a page to a deeper effect. His emphasis on needing patience and a strong work ethic in order to see future rewards perfectly not only applied to literary works, but also other slow processes such as the college application process. By incorporating writer’s thoughts “into] your bloodstream” (1), information gets preserved and further analyzed for years to come. The act of physically interpreting statements as if you were inquiring or joining a thought “preserve[s] those reactions and sharpen[s] those questions” (2).
There have been several occasions when I was writing a paper that I believe conveyed my stance or ideas on the topic properly. However, I found that I was incorrect in that belief. My critical analysis assignment, “Tweet Less, Kiss More Analysis” (4), was an example of when I incorrectly conveyed the topic that I was assigned. As it was an analysis paper about the article, “Tweet Less, Kiss More” by Bob Herbert, it was expected that I was to actually analysis the article. I, of course, believed that I had been doing that when it was brought to my attention that instead of analyzing the article, I had given my stance on the topic discussed in the article. It was because of that that I came to the realization that the structure and information put into an essay can completely change the readers’ views of the paper. Instead of the reader forming their own opinion or stance due to the article and my analysis of it, I had unintentionally only given my own stance on the topic that the article discussed. The information and structure of a paper is essential to the quality and clarity of the paper. A good paper cannot have one and not the other and that is something that I learned throughout this