Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Socrates philosophy of education Summary
Socrates quotes
The importance of knowledge
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Socrates philosophy of education Summary
“I have flaws. What are they? I … sing in the shower. Sometimes I spend too much time volunteering. Occasionally I’ll hit someone with my car,” said by the fictional character Michael Scott on the acclaimed American television show, The Office. “I am the smartest man in the world because I know that I know nothing,” Socrates. He was a classical Greek philosopher, and is credited with founding Western philosophy. What do these two men have in common? To have a meaningful life, it is important to be humble about one’s place in the universe,to value knowledge, and to stay curious.
“Get smart. Stay in school. Go to more school. Do homework,” all of these recommendations have been metaphorically pounded down the throat of countless numbers of
…show more content…
Knowledge can be defined as an awareness or familiarity with a situation, subject, or fact in general. In his quote, Socrates portrayed that to admit ignorance in a society that treats confidence as if it is gold, is brilliance. To borrow a term from the dramatics, Michael Scott is the foil to Socrates. The politician that will win the campaign is the one who is, often times, the most confident. The doctor of whom many people will entrust with cutting them open is he who is most confident. It is safe to say that in most situations, it is best that the most confident has the better likelihood of getting the job/getting the patient/getting the seat in the White House, because the public would likely be upset if the president was nervous, or the surgeon’s hands were shaking when the patient met …show more content…
He knew he did not know everything there was to know, but he wanted to learn as much as he could. To be smarter in one aspect of one’s life is to be smarter in several others; as my grandma always used to say when she was alive, knowledge is never wasted. She completed a degree in gerontology as she was getting older, just because she wanted to know what was happening to her. She was curious. To steal a quote from my history teacher, “The more you know the more fun life will be.” There is so much to study and to learn about, one just has to pick something, be curious about something, be an expert on something. Currently, all humans are unique, and therefore each person’s experience through life is different. To embrace this, and be curious, and be interested is to be engaged in life. It is to be an active human. This is what Socrates aimed to teach his followers: to be humble enough to admit ignorance is not a character flaw; however, to make no effort to reduce one’s ignorance is
Socrates put one’s quest for wisdom and the instruction of others above everything else in life. A simple man both in the way he talked and the wealth he owned, he believed that simplicity in whatever one did was the best way of acquiring knowledge and passing it unto others. He is famous for saying that “the unexplained life is not worth living.” He endeavored therefore to break down the arguments of those who talked with a flowery language and boasted of being experts in given subjects (Rhees 30). His aim was to show that the person making a claim on wisdom and knowledge was in fact a confused one whose clarity about a given subject was far from what they claimed. Socrates, in all his simplicity never advanced any theories of his own but rather aimed at bringing out the worst in his interlocutors.
Socrates established very early in his defense that he knew he had no wisdom, and he based his investigations of Athenians’ wisdom on finding at least one person wiser than he was. He recalled a story of Chaerephon, an old Athenian friend, who went to the Oracle of Delphi to ask whether anybody had more wisdom than Socrates did, and she “’…answered that there was no man wiser.’” (Plato, 3) Socrates explained that since he knew he had no wisdom, he began a search to find a ...
There are times in every mans life where our actions and beliefs collide—these collisions are known as contradictions. There are endless instances in which we are so determined to make a point that we resort to using absurd overstatements, demeaning language, and false accusations in our arguments. This tendency to contradict ourselves often questions our character and morals. Similarly, in The Trial of Socrates (Plato’s Apology), Meletus’ fallacies in reason and his eventual mistake of contradicting himself will clear the accusations placed on Socrates. In this paper, I will argue that Socrates is not guilty of corrupting the youth with the idea of not believing in the Gods but of teaching the youth to think for themselves by looking to new divinities.
Socrates: A Gift To The Athenians As Socrates said in Apology by Plato, “...the envy and detraction of the world, which has been the death of many good men, and will probably be the death of many more…”(Philosophical Texts, 34) Throughout history, many leaders have been put to death for their knowledge. In Apology, Socrates- soon to be put to death- says he was placed in Athens by a god to render a service to the city and its citizens. Yet he will not venture out to come forward and advise the state and says this abstention is a condition on his usefulness to the city.
Socrates is one of the greatest logicians humankind has ever produced. All the scholars before him engaged in different trivial matters regarding more concrete aspects of our reality, such as mathematics or natural phenomenon, but Socrates was different. Socrates sought out more intrapersonal questions, he devoted his entire life seeking out answers to these questions. Eventually this ambition led him to a notorious standing within his city of Athens, eventually leading to his trial and execution. The rebounding question that comes from this is “Should Socrates have stayed in prison and faced his execution?”. This is controversial because Socrates was wrongly convicted in his trial, but disregarding that he
In the dialogue, Crito, Socrates justified his decision to accept his death penalty. His decision was praised as principled and just. However, such a view was one of the greatest myths in the history of philosophy. Contrary to the accepted ideas, I wish to show that Socrates’ argument was erroneous, the crucial error being his failure to distinguish between substantial and procedural justice. In fact, the whole of the Crito refers to some deeper problems of the philosophy of law and morality.
Socrates’ argument that citizens enter an agreement or promise to obey the laws are to persuade the laws and making it an agreement. Socrates has three arguments for Athens and facing death. First, he believes that he will be received in Hades warmly if he abides by Athens' law. Second, Socrates argues that he has made a tacit agreement with the laws of Athens that he cannot justly break. Finally, he states that it is wrong to retaliate against those who have done you wrong, and thus it would be wrong to retaliate against Athens by escaping.
In Plato’s The Apology Socrates is tried for practicing his philosophy on wisdom and ignorance. He concluded that by recognizing his own ignorance he must be wiser than other men, in that he knows that he really does not know anything. For this sake, Socrates felt obligated to prove to the men who thought themselves wise, that they were in fact ignorant.
1B. As Socrates takes the stand to defend himself against the Athenian government he began to explain why he should not be there and how he ended up at the stand in the first place. He cites an encounter with the oracle Delphi. He explains that he asked the oracle who was wisest of all men. The oracle replied that no man was wiser then Socrates (note this will be important later in describing his philosophy). Socrates knowing that he himself knew nothing and that there must be somebody out there with more knowledge than him set out on a journey. He went to many different kinds of people, poets, craftsmen, even politicians. All seemed to have much knowledge about many things. But Socrates found that even with all their knowledge of poetry, politics, and crafts none of it was true wisdom. When he would tell these people that they were in fact not wise, they wouldn’t take to kindly to Socrates.
Socrates, Guilty Or Not? Ancient Athens was the site of a growing culture. Philosophy was among the many improvements and discoveries being made. With these improvements and discoveries, great thinkers were able to stretch their knowledge to new heights.
Throughout The Republic, Plato takes three approaches in his explanation of why the just person is happiest. The last two are mostly coherent; however, there are some flaws in his first argument. Plato makes a case for his ideal just state, but this state is impractical and unjust. Within the same argument, he also attempts to draw parallels between justice in the state and justice within individuals, which I find to be unconvincing.
There is a complex process through which a person acquires knowledge, and it depends on the mental capacity of a person as to how much knowledge he can acquire. In Plato’s Republic, we can see what knowledge does for the man in the allegory of the cave. In this story, knowledge was acquired by experience. In Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics, we learn what the ultimate intellectual virtues are and that wisdom is the highest of all. Knowledge from Plato and wisdom from Aristotle can be connected through the achievement of intellect.
To escape or to not escape? A question I thought I could easily answer, has a deeper meaning. With that being said, Socrates confronts this question/desire and the laws of Athens, head on. Socrates believes that if he indeed wanted to disobey the laws, by escaping, he would intentionally be destroying these laws as well as, the state. “Socrates: Well, look at it this way.
Socratic philosophy that, “I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know nothing” (The Republic), is contradictory to Athenians’ definition of being wise. Socrates inquires knowledge, life and virtue; he says, “the unexamined life is not with living for a human being” (Apology 38a-b). Socrates’s inquiry of moral and political authority of Athenians directly challenges the city’s law and value that individuals, family and the city depend on. Therefore, the Socratic skepticism incurs hatred and enmity from people who are angry and envious of Socrates. Socrates implies at the beginning of his speech that his fate is doomed because the people who judge him believe in the persuasive falsehoods and won’t be willing to listen to the truth. The death of Socrates also reveals the internal fallacy in Athenian democracy. The consequence of a recalcitrant philosophy stands against the whole city is written, because the gulf between the belief of the society and the philosophy is impassible. Socrates’s way of living seems to be unreasonable for most people, and as the same time is not suitable for the proper operation of society which doesn’t want civilians to question the essence of life. However, Socrates shifts the focus of philosophy from the heaven to the earth. Before Socrates, natural
Socrates was a man with a series of beliefs that made him one of the greatest philosophers of all time. He was known as a “midwife” for helping others bring their theories to life through communication. He believed asking questions was the only way you would come up with the best possible answer, and at least be closer to the truth. He firmly believed that understanding and being knowledgeable about the value of life was enough to make someone happy. Thus, he claimed that living the unexamined life would be worthless because of the lack of understanding and knowledge of virtue.