Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of religion on society
The effects of religion on society
The effects of religion on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of religion on society
Religion, magic and ritual has played a part in our society since civilization began. No society is free from some sort of religious influence, it appears that in some established societies religion is considered as one of the thee most important institutionalized structures. The institution of religion can be evaluated by varies sociological theories because the institution of religion has been part of every society from tribal communities right up to modern day civilisation. Within any society today it possible to find some sort of religion or spiritual network amongst individuals. This essay will examine the different sociological perspectives of religion, magic and ritual and will look at the different theories such functionalism, conflict, …show more content…
He suggested that religion is the origin of the concepts we need for reasoning and is also the beginnings of human thought, reason and science. He considered that religion promoted a social solidarity amongst people of a society in order for a society to run smoothly. (Kessler, 2012, p. 66) Through he analyzation of religion Durkheim came to the conclusion that the world divides religion into the Sacred and the Profane, Durkheim explains that through the sacred we set things apart from society so that we can connect to the sacred with strong emotions, these emotions produce feelings such as awe, wonder or fear which in turn are often linked to taboos and prohibitions.(Kessler, 2012, p.66) His thought was that we create the sacred as symbols as a representation of society itself as society has great power therefore, he looked at the sacred as if humans were worshipping society itself when worshipping sacred symbols. Durkheim described the profane as ordinary things with no significant meaning, these ordinary objects create powerful emotions amongst individuals in society as they are put in place to represent and symbolize the individual’s belief in the sacred, he called these totems and described that the objects were a representation of the collective conscious which is a basic set of shared beliefs, …show more content…
Marx saw society divided into two distinct classes the Bourgeoise and Proletariat, he saw that the ruling class exploited the working class through the means of capitalism. He argued that because of the exploitation by the ruling class there will always be a segregation of the classes and the potential for class conflict. Marx’s views couldn’t be more different than that of the functionalist theory, whereas functionalism sees religion as a positive unifying force that effectually holds society together with values and moral code Marxism sees religion as a feature of a class- divided society between the ruling elite and the working class. Moreover, Marx described religion as ‘the soul of the soulless conditions’ and the ‘opium of the people.’ Furthermore, Marx saw religion as and ideological weapon of the masses, not only did he believe that religion was put into to society to keep the working class under law and order as god fearing individuals, he also saw religion was used by the ruling class as a way of justifying the suffering of the poor as if it is something that is inevitable and God-given, this in turn misleads the poor into believing that the suffering they face throughout their lives is virtuous by nature and that they will be redeemed and rewarded in the afterlife. Marx’s concluded that once a class devided society becomes classless religion will disappear.
Emile Durkheim As An Idealist In "Elementary Forms Of The Religion Life" Durkheim's most important rationale in The Elementary Forms was to explain and clarify the generally primordial religious conviction identified by man. However, his focus as a consequence irk a number of outside connection for historians as his fundamental rationale went distinctly ahead of the modernization of an old culture for its own accord; quite the opposite, Durkheim's interest in The Division of Labor and Suicide, was eventually both contemporary as well as workable as he asserts that if prehistoric religion were taken as the topics of investigations, then it is for the reason that it apparently appears “to us better adapted than any other to lead to an understanding of the religious nature of man, that is to say, to show us an essential and permanent aspect of humanity”. Durkheim's doctrine studies that the society must abstain from reductionism and think about social phenomena- sui generis, disqualifying biologist or psychologist explanations; he focused concentration on the social-structural elements of mankind's social problems. Even though in his previous work Durkheim defined social facts by their constraint, massing his main part on the execution of the legal system, he was afterward moved to shift his views considerably. He then emphasized that those social facts and moral codes become potent guides and controls of behavior only to the extent that they become internalized in the cognizance of individuals, while persisting to subsist exclusively of individuals. This, compulsion is not a customary restraint of distant controls on individual will, but rather a moral commitment to conform to a rule. Durkheim attempted to study social facts not onl...
According to Marx, religion comes from the imagination of the mind, “Man makes religion.” (H/R,p.11) Marx believes in Atheism and that religion is simply justification to our actions and behaviors as “followers.”
One of, if not the most, important claims made by Marx in this writing is that the mind does not shape reality, supported by his calls to “…liberate them [men] from the chimeras, the ideas, dogmas, imaginary beings under the yoke of which they are pining away.” (Marx 162). In fact, he criticizes Hegelian society by calling their ideology “…innocent and childlike…” (Marx 162) for allowing men to try and shape reality with their minds. Instead, Marx argues that it is not enough to simply accredit religious beliefs to a man’s own conceptions; that everything he believes must be shaped in a social, economic, and historic
"Karl Marx on Religion: The Opiate of the Masses?" About.com Agnosticism / Atheism. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 May 2014.
Religion is an ever-growing idea that has no set date of origin. Throughout history religion has served as an answer to the questions that man could not resolve. The word religion is derived from the Latin word “religio” meaning restraint in collaboration with the Greek word “relegere” which means to repeat or to read again. Religion is currently defined as an organized system of beliefs and practices revolving around, or leading to, a transcendent spiritual experience. Throughout time, there has yet to be a culture that lacks a religion of some form, whether it is a branch of paganism, a mythological based religion or mono/polytheistic religion. Many religions have been forgotten due to the fact that they were ethnic religions and globalizing religions were fighting to be recognized, annihilating these ancient and ethnic religions. Some of these faiths include: Finnish Paganism, Atenism, Minoan Religion, Mithraism, Manichaeism, Vedism, Zoroastrianism, Asatru, and the Olmec Religion. Religion is an imperative part of our contemporary world but mod...
Lehmann A. C. & Myers J. E. Magic, Witchcraft and Religion – An Anthropological Study of the Supernatural (Fourth Edition) (Mayfield Publishing Company, 1997). Miner, H. Body Ritual Among the Nacirema. American Anthropologist 58 (1956). Tambiah, S. J. & Co., Ltd. Magic, Science, Religion and the scope of Rationality (Cambridge University Press, 1990). Taylor, C. Rationality.
The Society Religion as a Social Glue The view in the title is a functionalist’s view. Durkheim claims that religion is to do with the sacred and certain things, people and places are perceived to be sacred for example Jesus Christ, totem and the Tajmahal. He claims that what people perceive to be sacred are actually symbols of a collective consciousness. By worshipping these sacred things etc. they are actually reinforcing the beliefs, values, norms and tradition which make social life possible.
Magic is widely practiced in primal and traditional societies. In such contexts magic is not simply a pre-scientific way of attaining practical ends- it may also involve at least a partial symbolic recognition of the society’s spiritual worldview and of its gods and myths. In this respect magic often merges with religion, and indeed the line between the two is frequently blurred (Ellwood, Encarta).
With his own concepts and his combined concepts with Engels, Marx was a large contributor not only to the field of sociology but to the economy and more. Karl Marx was an avid follower of Hegel’s philosophies. Being that Hegel was a well known philosopher in various parts of Europe, Marx took further interests in his ideas. Marx’s strides in the field of sociology is still impacting the field and even our current society. In Alienation and Social Classes, Marx explains that the lower class and wealthy are complete opposites. Marx continues on to explain that although the two are opposite, they are both results of the private property world. Marx says to question the position of either side, but to question them separately, because to question them as a whole would be unfair. “Private property as private property, as wealth, is compelled to preserve its own existence and thereby the existence of its opposite, the proletariat”. The lower class helps the wealthy exists, and the wealthy as well, aids in the lower class existing. “The proletariat, on the other hand is compelled to abolish itself and thereby its conditioning opposite—private property—which makes it proletariat.” (KM p. 133) The lower class as a whole according to Marx, is self destructive compare to the wealthy. Being self destructive is seen as a “negative” side of
Durkheim’s study of religion in The Elementary Forms of Religious Life is widely renowned to be one of the founding theories and definitions of the sociology of religion. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life presents Durkheim’s core belief that sociology of religion should be studied in a rational and objective manner. This essay will go into the definition of religion provided in chapter 2 in depth, particularly Durkheim’s sacred and profane dichotomy, which he views as fundamental to religion, and his controversial denial of the divine being necessary for all religions. This essay will examine the counterargument of how the Divine could arguably be a feature common in all religions. Furthermore, we will focus on Durkheim 's problematic
Karl Marx, a German philosopher, once said, “Religion is the opium of the people.” During the medieval ages, religion drove the daily lives of the people. People used the Catholic religion as a way to justify their living conditions in order to ease their suffering. However, the upper class used religion to their advantage as it enabled them to deceit the lower class into giving them money. This created a disparity between the two classes. In The Book of Margery Kempe by Margery Kempe, the Catholic ideology blinded society from the corrupt socioeconomic system between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat.
Durkheim is a key figure in understanding religion from a functionalist perspective. He believes that social order and stability can only exist if people are integrated into society by value consensus. Religion is seen as an important institution for achieving these functions as it sets a moral code for
In discussing the similarities between Marx, Weber and Durkheim, it is important to understand what social order and social change are. Social order is the systems of social structures (relations, values and practice etc.) that maintain and enforce certain patterns of behaviour. Whereas, social change refers to an alteration in the social order of a society, examples of such alterations can be changes in nature, social institutions, behaviours and/or social relations. (Bratton and Denham 2014) Throughout time, religion has always been a hot topic of controversy, whether it is based on being a part of the same religion, to having different religious views on life and how to live life. This is due in large to the ever changing views on religion and the way it can be practised. Religion can be viewed in both aspects of social order and social change because it is part of a system, however, alterations are frequently made. The three sociologists Marx, Weber and Durkheim have all expressed their views on religion with respect to society. Webers’ views show the effects
Marx saw religion as a tool for class oppression because of the conflict it provided for societies. According to Marx, “religion is the opium of the people” and “religion promotes stratification because it supports a hierarchy of people in Earth and the subordination of humankind to divine authority.” Marx believes that man makes religion, and not vice versa. He argues that religion is a mere product of man and is for people who have not won himself or has lost himself again. He calls for the banishment of religion stating that religion is just an illusion of happiness and the abolition of it is a demand for real happiness. Religion highlights social conditions and causes people to think and act the way religion teaches instead of having individuals act based on their own agency.
Marx saw religion as an evil that existed in society and that it brought down all the people that believed in that religion. Marx said that, ?It [religion] is the opium of the people,?[1] and in saying this, Marx meant that religion was contagious on society. Once the society had a taste for the religion, they became totally engulfed it in, and then they do not want to get out of that way of live because they see it as a good way to live. Then even if people wanted to get out of the religion it was hard to get out because the whole society had already been infected by the ?opium.?