Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The psychological significance of Dostoevsky
How is society reflected in literature
Dostoevsky theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The psychological significance of Dostoevsky
Socially Constructed Reality and Meaning in Notes from Underground
Just as the hands in M.C. Escher’s “Drawing Hands” both create and are created
by each other, the identity of man and society are mutually interdependent. According to
the model described in The Sacred Canopy, Peter Berger believes that man externalizes
or creates a social reality that is in turn objectified, or accepted by him as real. This
sociological model creates a useful framework for understanding the narrator’s rejection
of ultimate reality or truth in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground. The reality
in which the narrator tries to live in part II, and the reality that he rejects in part I, are
both created and, as such, are ultimately meaningless. The underground man’s refusal to
objectify social reality causes a feeling of meaninglessness and raises a fundamental
question of purpose that confronts people of all dispositions.
Berger’s theory is based on a dialectical relationship between man and society. To
explain his theory he defines three terms. “Externalization is the ongoing outpouring of
human being into the world. Objectivation, the attainment by the products of this activity
of a reality that confronts its original producers as a facticity external to and other than
themselves. Internalization is the reappropriation by men of this same reality,
transforming into structures of the subjective consciousness,” (Berger 4). He believes that
society is a wholly human invention created by man’s tendency to externalize. This
created entity is then objectified by man, giving society and its features the appearance of
true reality. His newly created reality then acts upon and shapes man through
internalization. Man, his identity...
... middle of paper ...
...fulfills his societal roles. Chernyshevsky’s utilitarian is happy
when individual needs are met. The man of consciousness can be happy, even if his
happiness comes from the rejection of happiness altogether. There is no superior
happiness; there is no superior type of fulfillment. The individual achieves these ends by
acting individually. No hand can avoid drawing, and man finds completeness when he
fulfills the purpose that he has drawn for himself.
Works Cited
Berger, Peter L. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion.
New York: Anchor Books, 1990.
Escher, M.C. “Drawing Hands.” Cover of Norton edition of Notes from Underground.
Katz, Michael R., ed. Notes from Underground. New York: W.W. Norton & Company,
2001.
Chernyshevsky, Nikolai. “What Is to Be Done?” Katz 104-123.
Dostoevsky, Fyodor. “Notes from Underground.” Katz 3-91
Ryan, Richard M., and Edward L. Deci. "On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of
The story is concerned with the conflict between his conception of himself and the reality.
Within Steinbeck's story, "Chrysanthemums," the main character, Elisa Allen, is confronted with many instances of conflict. Steinbeck uses chrysanthemums to symbolize this conflict and Elisa's self-worth. By examining these points of conflict and the symbolism presented by the chrysanthemums, the meaning of the story can be better determined.
As we see in the daily news, people are often cruel and inhumane, and we also see kinder people in everyday life. We see people who give up their own personal pleasure so they can serve others. But while these people are far and few between, it becomes quickly obvious that humans are drawn towards self-happiness. Bibliography:.. 1. What is the difference between a. and a Leviathan.
The Salinas Valley is symbolic to Elisa’s inner feelings. The farm responsibilities Elisa shared with her husband Henry encouraged “cold and tender” thoughts that often left Elisa feeling “closed off from the rest of the world” (paragraph 1). Her consistent lonely and empty days began to “fog” the belief of any better days to come. The [quiet of waiting] was yearning for any “sharp and positive” (paragraph 2) notion that had yet to be nurtured. But until Elisa was given any chance to set free of such desires she had to remain forcibly content inside of her chrysanthemum garden.
Using philosopher John Mills’s meaning, “Those only are happy who have their minds fixed on some object other than their own happiness; on the happiness of others,"(McMahon P.11;S.1) which means that the only way one can be happy is by putting forth their attention to the happiness of others, and not themselves. Mahatma Gandhi once said, “The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in the service of others.” Compassion makes people contented. Giving to others could increase our prosperity more than spending money on ourselves. Giving is the key to
Berger and Luckmann offer a treatise to the social construction of reality that outlines how we formulate the idea of the “self” in social society and how reality itself is socially constructed. “Knowledge must always be knowledge from a certain position.” It is our social position that guides our perceptions of reality and allows us to embrace our idea of “self” within reality. Everyday life presents itself as a reality that is interpreted by others and is subjectively meaningful because of such interpretations.
Have you ever notice that every day the body goes through some type of Physical Fitness? Well it does, in fact it’s a natural achievement without facing much of prostration. Mental wellbeing is a basic factor for living a good life, a complex angle of the overall state of health. To be accurate, self-esteem and life’s pleasure are conductive state of mind that commit to having a mentally healthy approaching towards others.
...powerful forces in binding people together, nationalism is a powerful force capable of inducing people to act collectively, share burdens, and even make sacrifices for the nation’s common good. As a result, it promotes the stability of democracies.
who achieve sense of meaning in their lives are happier than those who live from one pleasure to another.
The hierarchy of needs and person-centered theory share humanistic psychology’s approach toward the person. In the Abraham Maslow hierarchy of needs, humans satisfy
Moore, G.E. & Scanlon, T.M. (2013). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Well-Being. Stanford, CA 94305-4115: The Metaphysics Research Lab.
Suppose one was to record their pleasures down on paper using a graph. At first, one might be confused as to how to go about quantifying their happiness. After consideration of the quality of ones varying pleasures though, one is more able to deduce whether it is a higher or a lower pleasure and graph them. This enables one to distinguish which things promote the greatest pleasure, which translates itself to strive for happiness. For example, consider the attainment of food or sex in contrast to mental and spiritual growth. When one is only interested in satiating their appetite for food or sex, the pleasure acquired is minuscule when compared to the acquisition of mental and spiritual growth. Thus, attaining mental and spiritual growth will bring o...
In my paper I will clarify the seven measurements of wellbeing and how we require every one and how they identify with us. These measurements are: Social Wellness, Emotional Wellness, Spiritual Wellness, Environmental Wellness, Occupational Wellness, Intellectual Wellness and Physical Wellness. Every one of the measurements of health have critical impact in our day by day living with how we converse with individuals, to how we think rationally. My paper will have the capacity to clarify measurements of wellbeing altogether.
This is because interpretations of socioeconomic rights on an international level are regarded as too expansive, going further than what it means to be free from poverty. To be free from poverty, one would have basic subsistence necessary to lead a minimally good life. In this essay, I will argue that there is a human right to be free from poverty. I will focus primarily on the argument that poverty undermines human rights, therefore there is an implicit right to be free from poverty. An implicit right is still a right as some implied rights, depending on the legal precedent and statute, are protected by law and able override explicit rights. By considering the link between poverty and human rights intrinsic, the argument will be presented by questioning the capacity for freedom in relation to the right to liberty. I will also discuss limitations to the argument using the claimability objection to rights and how it is necessary for a right to be enforceable and have duty-bearers to be considered a right. My conclusion will be highlighted by showing that rights can be claimed as entitlements via a pre-existing social