Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender roles
Gender roles
Comparison and contrast socialism and capitalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender roles
Since the early days of civilization economic systems have provided its benefits and follies. From bartering, monetary exchange and credit, the economy has grown to be a pillar with in any society. Within the western world, economy has had the power to influence society and culture. Capitalism is the economic system most commonly used around the world, which begun its bloom in the early industrial ages. Socialism and communism are other socio-economic systems which arose in in retaliation of a capitalistic world. While a majority of the world uses this system, it has negative side effects, as pointed out in the philosophy of socialism. Published in 1959, Player Piano by Kurt Vonnegut, is a satirical novel which looks at an industrial post war …show more content…
era, where automation has replaced the labor of mankind. WALL-E, by Andrew Stanton follows the adventure of a trash compacting robot whose main directive is to clean up the earth after humans severely pollute it. “A world without work” is an article written by Derek Thompson explores and analyzes the loss of work by investigating Youngstown USA, a once booming steel town, reduced mere shavings. All three sources portray the follies of capitalism, a system which emphasizes production that leads to the alienation of the working class. Alienation is commonly seen as being applicable to only minority groups and individuals in society due to either lack of understanding or actions which do not flow with societal norms. However, all three sources show that alienation is not only applicable to minorities and outliers, but also a majority. Through capitalism, the working class has lost its sense of purpose, due to an economy which puts production value over worker value. In Player Piano a great war has led to a mass section of the population to be shipped over sea’s. Since there a majority of the working class is off fighting a war, they become replaced with machines. A majority of these machines were only meant to be a temporary fix, but it was soon found that these machines produce greater quantities at a faster, cheaper and efficient rate. As the men and women return home they find there to be no work as machines have replaced their lively hood. Through this, many workers are being alienated and have lost their sense of purpose. For example, Rudy Hertz, an individual who spent most of his working life at a machine has been replaced by a machine. Paul Proteus finds himself in front of a single operational box, “And here, now, this little loop in the box before Paul was Rudy as Rudy had been to his machine” (Vonnegut 10). Rudy is a single person, who operates a single machine. Hundreds of machines that were once operated by hundreds of individuals have been replaced by a single box. All of these workers, no longer have a job, they now serve no function within society. Their job had been to produce mechanical parts, but instead of being a functional cog they are reduced to being scrap metal. These workers are no longer needed nor are they wanted. Instead they are forced to live their lives without meaning or purpose, no task to be good at, no function to serve and no reason to excel. Alongside this, in the decaying world of WALL-E, it is also shown that the working class has no sense of purpose simply because there is no longer a working class. With limited dialogue, Stanton provides a clear message with the scenery and actions within WALL-E. As human kind now lives in a cruise ship like spaceship, they have everything handed to them (literally and figuratively) by a company called “Buy N’ Large: everything you need to be happy” (Stanton). This company has eliminated the working class completely by having all of its products made through automation, which is highly favored in a capitalist system. No need for labor regulations, fair minimum wage, worker’s rights or benefits if there are no workers but instead machines which have no bounds or rights. Through the excessive automation, the population has no need to work, they have no purpose. There are no jobs, they do nothing, “that’s all anyone on this ship has ever done- nothing” (Stanton). There is no longer a need to walk, hold your own drink of even move. The population has been reduced to masses of fat which serves no purpose. If they did not exist, their world would be no different. While these extremes seem fictional, Thompson, through his article defines work to be three things “the means by which the economy produces goods, the means by which people earn income and an activity that lends meaning or purpose to many people’s lives” (Thompson). Through capitalism, the working class is being alienated due to their loss or purpose and in the article Thompson says that this loss of purpose already happened, by using the example of a cashier, commenting on the worker feels no purpose in the meaningless work they do, simply scanning an item. The did not make the item, or help in any manner hence they do not feel a connection with it. Their purpose, is to find, scan, slide and repeat opposed to water, grow, feed and provide society with the food it needs to strive. Loss of purpose is caused by alienation, which is fueled by capitalisms need for production. In addition to a loss of purpose, the working population has also suffered intellectual segregation.
In Player Piano, the world is divided into three parts, “In the northwest are the managers and engineers…the northeast the machines…and in the south, the area known locally has Homestead where almost all the people live” (Vonnegut 1). The people in this world are literally divided by land mass. The individuals who live and Homestead have no connection with the individuals who live in the northwest. These two people provide two different demographics, the proletariat and the “capitalists”. The “capitalists” are those which work on and manage the machinery. These individuals are highly educated with doctoral degree’s opposed to the proletariats who have no need for higher education and spend most of their days simply existing. The “capitalists” and proletariats are divided intellectually, and often times cannot relate. More so, the commonalties feel as if they were the lesser group. When Paul enters into a bar in Homestead that is mostly frequented by the common people, a waitress says, “What are you doing here- having a good laugh at the dumb bunnies?” (Vonnegut 103). This intellectual division has led to an emotional division as well. A majority feels lesser than the minority simply because of intelligence. The waitress referring to herself and those around her as “dumb bunnies” shows that in her eyes and the eyes of the many, “capitalists” look down upon them and mock them …show more content…
and that they may be right in doing so. This division transcends the pages of a novel and into the realm of film. WALL-E also has the same division, but instead of this division occurring between two groups of people, it is between people and an entire different entity, robots. The co-pilot of the spaceship is a robot named Auto. Early on, the mission’s director said in a classified document “I’m giving override directive A113- go to full auto pilot, take full control of everything, do not return to earth” (Stanton). This directive was only given to the robot and not the human captain. The captain has no knowledge of this, and still believes that they will return to earth, whereas the robot knows they will not. The human population as a whole had lost a lot of knowledge overall simply due to the lack of work. Capitalism provided automation so the population didn’t need to learn and forgot a lot of things. The concept of earth, sea, crops and many other things had been forgotten whereas the machines still had knowledge of this. They had true knowledge of what state the earth was in and what the real mission was. The humans thought they control the machines, but in reality the machines controlled them. Even the captain of the ship felt lesser than the machine when a mutiny occurs, he felt powerless. Furthermore, the population has also incurred a loss of goals and aspirations.
Among the individuals who live within Homestead, there are some which possess a good understanding of mechanics and engineering. While driving through Homestead, Paul’s car breaks down as he runs into a group of laborers. As Paul gets out of his, the group starts theorizing about what is broken on the car, the oldest of the group says, “Sucking in air. I knew the minute I heard you coming a mile off” (Vonnegut 70). He proceeds to fix the fuel pump and, lo and behold he was right, that was the source of the problem. This individual does not lack the intellectual ability to become an engineer, but lacks the aspiration and ambition to do so. The working class has no purpose; they feel lesser hence they do not have goals or want to be anything other than what they are. Capitalism produces a system where the value of the worker becomes deflated. They are being alienated due to the circumstances surrounding them, the fact that machines are favored gives them the ideology that they cannot compete with a machine. They look down upon themselves and see that they are trapped where they are and no longer aspire to be anything else. In “World Without Work”, the author says “Most people want to work, and are miserable when they cannot” (Thompson). This state of being miserable and depressed stops these proletariats from seeing the bigger picture. They cannot see the end of the tunnel. They become stuck in
their same day to day lives. They have the want, the want to work, the want to enjoy the fruit of their labor. But when they live in a system where everyone is being replaced to maximize production efficiency, that want is unattainable and flickers away into a trail of smoke. In closing, capitalism has advantages and a majority of the world uses this system. Regardless of its advantages, like any hero, capitalism suffers from a fatal flaw. It creates a disconnect for the workers within it. The main motive of a capitalist economy is to make the most money, the cheapest way. All three sources show this motive that is flawed. The capitalistic emphasis on production value opposed to value of workers alienates the working class through a loss of purpose, intellectual segregation and a loss of aspiration. Money and machines were created to aid humanity, not betray it.
We, as a society, feel the need to draw imaginary lines to separate ourselves whether it’s the line between color of our skin, our religion differences, our political beliefs, or the status of our class. As much as I wish there wasn’t a defining line between high class and the educated vs. low class and uneducated, there is. In Mike Rose’s narrative essay “Blue-Collar Brilliance,” he describes his mother’s lack of education and her hard labor work which is the quote on quote the blue collar working class.
... to play in that world so the polar bear’s words comes off as irrational. You can relate this to how some people in the working class are content with the jobs they have and don’t quite aspire for more because of the economic situation they’re in. Say that jobs are difficult to finds nowadays where more and more educated people are being hired, so the ones without a degree are content with working where they are and don’t want to argue for more because of the risk of losing their jobs. Some people are just resigned to their ‘fate’.
A big disadvantage that the lower class has compared to the wealthy is a lack of quality education. While serving as a waitress, Ehrenriech learned about many different people. Some of these co-workers were immigrants who had recently come to this country. “I learn that he [George] is not paid by Jerry’s but the ‘agent’ who shipped him over--$5 an hour, with the agent getting the dollar or so difference between that and what Jerry’s pays dishwashers”(38). Their contracts lacked any benefits, and they were paid below minimum wage. People, like George, cannot read their contracts before they sign because they don’t understand the language. The critic would argue, “…They are baffled at the idea of fighting the class struggle of which…Ehrenriech appears to be the only person complaining about the situation…” In Georg...
Marx’s idea of the estrangement of man from the product of his labor described the suffering of countless hours or work by the laborer, contributing to the production of a product that he could not afford with the wages he made. He helped to produce a product that only those wealthier than he could afford. As the society around him became more object-oriented, he became increasingly more alienated. In the lager, one factor that distanced the laborer from his product was that he no longer worked for a wage, but for survival. In a description of his fellow worker, Levi wrote, “He seems to think that his present situation is like outside, where it is honest and logical to work, as well as being of advantage, because according to what everyone says, the more one works the more one earns and eats.” Levi pitied his fellow worker for his naivety, as the Lager was not a place of labor for prosperity, but strictly a place of labor by force. One worked in order to live, focusing more on the uncertainty of their next meal, day, or even breath than the product of their l...
He begin by introducing a town where people struggle for job to support themselves. Schultz provide a quote "Every day now more men stand at the railroad station" (3), This quote means a lot in poem because they were chosen for work. In the poem Mr. Schultz who is the speaker talk about Hispanics people get jobs first before white and black people because they owner knows Hispanics will take less money and will do all work. This in itself is already a class versus class issue. This shows how lower class are getting used for business; and the lower class people know but they are frightened and concerned about future. In the Unites States, society and class defines people based off of wealth and in this case, the Hispanics are known to be in the lower class. On the other hand the speaker talk about upper level class. Wealth plays a big role in terms of class and perspective. The problem here is that many people are looking for jobs in the United States and the Hispanics are taking the jobs of the Americans for lower wages. The lower class is worried about the money they get which is hard. The wealthy also has their own stuff to worry about which is losing their homes to banks. Just like in the first poem, it is not only about class but perspective. The wealthy has their own problems while the low class has theirs as well. Both classes have their own problems to deal
In the beginning of the play, Walter is foolish and quarrelsome, with his heart set on becoming affluent. As he grasps how hard work his father worked and how hard his family works, he reasons that living by his standards is more important than gaining wealth, and he stops feeling resentful towards them. This play highlights how many members of society focus more on making money than living by their ethical
Robert T. Tally Jr. uses the phrase “misanthropic humanism” to describe Vonnegut’s examination of the human condition. The term “misanthropic humanism” describes the idea that humanity’s desire for a utopia which is hindered by human nature’s flaws which prevent a true utopian society from flourishing. Vonnegut often explores the idea that humanity turns a utopian dream into a dystopian nightmare (Tally Jr. 18). Vonnegut writes about this theme most prominently in his novel Player Piano, in which human life is rendered meaningless because of manmade machines that bring about an era of mechanical reproduction which renders human life meaningless. In the novel, Humanity’s quest for improvement leads to its downfall
Mamata Banerjee once said, “We are not Marxist or Capitalist; we are for the poor people”, and that perfectly symbolizes the Marxist cause. Many Marxist views are represented in many books throughout history, and they help to prove how bad Capitalism truly is. In Kate Chopin’s The Awakening there lie many subtleties of Marxism and its ideals. Chopin injects the ideals into the novel through characters’ actions and behaviors. Three characters in particular represent the evils of Capitalism in the teachings of Marxist, and those characters are Edna Pontellier, Léonce Pontellier, and Robert Lebrun. Each one of these characters’ Capitalistic ideals punishes Edna throughout the entirety of the text.
Fred Wright, Lauren's instructor for EN 132 (Life, Language, Literature), comments, "English 132 is an introduction to English studies, in which students learn about various areas in the discipline from linguistics to the study of popular culture. For the literature and literary criticism section of the course, students read a canonical work of literature and what scholars have said about the work over the years. This year, students read One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest, by Ken Kesey, a classic of American literature which dates from the 1960s counterculture. Popularized in a film version starring Jack Nicholson, which the class also watched in order to discuss film studies and adaptation, the novel became notable for its sympathetic portrayal of the mentally ill. For an essay about the novel, students were asked to choose a critical approach (such as feminist, formalist, psychological, and so forth) and interpret the novel using that approach, while also considering how their interpretation fit into the ongoing scholarly dialogue about the work. Lauren chose the challenge of applying a Marxist approach to One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest. Not only did she learn about critical approaches and how to apply one to a text, she wrote an excellent essay, which will help other readers understand the text better. In fact, if John Clark Pratt or another editor ever want to update the 1996 Viking Critical Library edition of the novel, then he or she might want to include Lauren's essay in the next edition!"
Under capitalism, the proletariat relates to their labor as a strange object and lack any sort of identification with it. They invest their lives into objects and no longer own their own labor. The worker becomes more alienated the more he or she produces. The worker shrinks in comparison to this world of objects that he or she helps create but can not possess and habitually loses the power to determine life and destiny. They can not think of themselves as the directors of their own actions, are under control of the bourgeoisie, and treated as a
Equal work, equal wages, equal food, equal opportunities, equal power. On the outside, a society where every one of its citizens was completely equal sounds and appears like a good thing, even a great thing. No one had too much power, everyone seemed to be happy, and most importantly everyone worked to better the community instead of themselves. This is what Socialism was portrayed as: a system in which everyone worked together to benefit the state. Contradicting this fabricated image, life under Socialism did not succeed in equality for men and women, and it caused people to do whatever necessary in order to gain some sense of individualism. While equality for all people in all aspects of life sounds appealing, it was an unachievable goal
Steinbeck‘s view of work was that it was a means of physical survival and a spiritual necessity. The Joad family does whatever they can to survive, even if it means leaving home and going to an unknown part of the country. Miller believes work determines one’s social status and barely pays the bills for modern appliances in the consumer-driven world that the Lomans live in. The Lomans and Joads are similar b...
Even so, the rich feel a sense of comfortability with alienation. Alienation is powerful on its own and shows human reality. Marx notes that within the opposition for both sides, each represent sides. The wealthy represent the conservative side, while the lower class represents the destructive side. Surprisingly when it comes to economic development, the wealthy tend to unconsciously sabotage themselves. Their own self sabotaging assists the lower class in a beneficial way. “When the proletariat wins victory, it by no means becomes the absolute side of society, for it wins victory only by abolishing itself and its opposite.” (KM p. 134) When the lower class wins, both the wealthy and lower class cease to exist. In Marx’s society, the “proletariats” are seen as gods. The proletariats are seen as practical people. Marx declares that the proletariats are “the completed abstraction from everything human; since all the living conditions of contemporary society have reached the acme of inhumanity in the living conditions of the
Most of us own neither the tools and machinery we work with nor the products that we produce--they belong to the capitalist that hired us. But everything we work on and in at some point comes from human labor. The irony is that everywhere we turn, we are confronted with the work of our own hands and brains, and yet these products of our labor appear as things outside of us, and outside of our control.
Karl Marx’s critique of political economy provides a scientific understanding of the history of capitalism. Through Marx’s critique, the history of society is revealed. Capitalism is not just an economic system in Marx’s analysis. It’s a “specific social form of labor” that is strongly related to society. Marx’s critique of capitalism provides us a deep understanding of the system to predict its pattern and protect ourselves from its negative sides.