Expressive Social Style Essay

“Group members express themselves in a multitude a different ways ranging from productive to destructive (Griffith, Dunham, 2015, pg. 47, par. 4).” There are social behaviors that are developed when teams come together. There are four social style classifications, analytic, expressive, driver and amiable. The analytical social style are more precise and clear in whatever direction they need to complete a job (Farrington, 2013). Analytics will always be prepared for a task because the very nature of their behavior is to be astute and calculating. The upside to this social style is that their research or work is usually dependable but they also may not be open to criticism which can stifle progress. Expressive team members are involved heavily

The value in the expressive social style is that simply they are fun to be around and can be the cheerleader in the group which is conducive to team building.The down side to the expressive social type is that their interpersonal actions may not be the most focused in a group and therefore they are not usually the most dependable team member. The driver social style are more efficient and goal oriented (Farrington, 2013). A team member who is a driver is more than likely a leader but should not be allowed to supercede the actual team leads authority. Amiable members in a group value personal relationships and try to avoid conflict (Farrington, 2013). An amiable team members is primarily just that, a team member. It is important that team leaders identify which social style that their team members has and conduct business with said members accordingly (Griffith, Dunham,

One level of conflict and seemingly the easiest to resolve is the dispute over facts or data (Griffith, Dunham, 2015). Facts and data is straightforward information. Literally, a fact or a sample of data is true work that must be looked no other way but being what it is, however, teams can easily be misled by facts or data that has been interpreted or inputted incorrectly. The easy fix to resolving such a dispute is to retrieve the correct fact or data. Another level of conflict is processes and methods. Probably the most common common conflict occurs when group members cannot agree on how to proceed with a task. This can be common because this conflict is basically how the world works. Every single person on the face of this planet can give a different way to solve a problem that could reach the same solution. When this occurs that is when a team leader needs to step in and take control of the direction that should be taken. Giving and having respect is the key to resolving conflicts regarding process and methods. Goals and purposes are yet another level of conflict that can arise within a workgroup. This does not happen unless the soul task was just thrust upon the team and and the whole ordeal is confusing. Once again it is up to the team leader to get a clear understanding of a tasks goal to be able to direct the members in the right direction. Then there are values and beliefs, presumably the hardest