Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Explain conflict management
Team Work / Conflict Management
Conflicts between conflict and conflict management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Explain conflict management
Dealing with Conflict in Work Teams
Conflict will always exist when a group or team is composed with different people with different approaches and ideas with dealing with situations. Learning to work together with dealing with conflict can and will provide your group or team with a quick resolution. Conflict can not be avoided and is inevitable in letting a team develop and provide a constructive and possibly beneficial outcome in managing the conflict.
When we generally think of conflict it is a very negative thought about the team member. Usually there is arguing, yelling or disagreeing which can make others feel uncomfortable. Learning how to deal and handle these disagreements constructively will usually improve the productivity and create new ideas and help develop personality of other in the team. Each team will go through stages of growth and development. "Team conflict can be resolved quickly and effectively and only requires one key ingredient and that is a team leader who can diagnose a team within stages of team development and choose from an array of effective team leadership skills." (Warren, Jon) Letting the team members get to know each other in forming better a workable group with the support and direction of the leader.
There are many stages in dealing with conflict. The start of the conflict is the storming stage which is dealing when the conflict starts, then norming stage will let the team members start to work out there differences and the leader should try to be there and be supportive for the group. Lastly the performing part is when the whole team can move forward and work together and then the leader can finally be supportive and directive.
When a conflict arises there are different approaches in handling the situations. When the conflict is beginning, it is best to deal with the problem so it does not get out of hand. Here is a list of different ways in trying to overcome a conflict (Swales, Cheri)
1. attack the problem not the team member
2. focus on what can be done, not on what can not be done
3. listen to understand the other personâ??s point of view before giving your own
4. show respect for the other personâ??s point of view
5. solve the problem while building the relationship
If the conflict gets out of hand, the group probably needs to take a break and get back at a later date and time....
... middle of paper ...
..., MA, (2003, December) People Management, Ten tips for team success, pp. 40 â?? 54
Archived at http:// UOP Library EBSCOhost
Couzins, Martin, Beagrie, Scott, (2004, February 24) Personnel Today, How to â?¦ build effective teams, pp29, 2/3, 1cArchived at http:// UOP Library EBSCOhost
Hastings, Colin. Training in Team working Skills Industrial & Commercial Training, Mar1983, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p86, 4p; Abstract http:// UOP Library EBSCOhost
Kennedy, Michael. (1998). Managing conflict in Work Teams. CSWT Papers
Mitchell, Rex C., Ph.D. (2002) Constructive Management of Conflict in Groups
Prager, (1999, December) Training & Development, Cooking up Effective Team Building, pp. 14-15Archived at http:// UOP Library EBSCOhost
Roebuck, Deborah Britt; Brock, Stephen J.; Moodie, Douglas R. Using a Simulation to Explore the Challenge of Communication in a Virtual Team Business Communication Quarterly, Sep2004, Vol. 67 Issue 3, p359, 9p http:// UOP Library EBSCOhost
Swales, Cheri. (2004) Overcome Team Conflict. Monster Career Center
Townsley, Carole A. Resolving Conflict in Work Teams. RV Armstrong and Associates
Week, Dudley. (1992). The Conflict Resolution Process.
An effective team typically develops through several stages. Tuckman and Jensen developed a model for how teams should develop that includes five stages: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning (as cited in Martin ,2006 and Fulk, Bell,& Bodie ,2011). In forming, the first stage in team development, team members are introduced to the team’s purpose and goals(Martin, 2006 ; Fulk et al. ,2011). Fulk et al. (2011) explain that members are usually motivated and excited about working together to accomplish the specific goal, but they point out that interactions among team members can be affected by uncertainty about purpose, anxiety, mistrust ,and reluctance to share ideas and opinions. Nevertheless, despite such uncertainties, team members usually avoid conflict and move on to the next stage, storming(Fulk et al.,2011). Unlike the forming stage, the storming stage is marked by conflict (Martin...
Thompson, L. (2014). Making the team: A guide for managers. (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Quirus, E. (2013). Creating an Environment for Your Team to Strive. Strategic Finance, 95(10), 20-22.
Thompson, L.L. (2014). Making the team: A guide for managers (5th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Larson, C. and LaFasto, F. (1989), Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Upon completion of these assessments, the work place team is then formed, acquiring team members based upon the needs of the project, mission or goal of the team. The team then proceeds to learn about each other. In learning about one another, individual learning styles must be identified to gain an understanding of how to maximize team performance by capitalizing on team members' strengths via learning styl...
Conflict, when managed effectively, can be constructive. Conflict theorists have labeled this type of conflict as “C-Type Conflict or cognitive conflict” (Amason, Hochwarter, Thompson & Harrison, 1995, p. 22). Conflict of this type is usually centered on issue or opinion related differences and has a positive effect on the team. It increases team member involvement by allowing each member to speak his or her opinion or idea and evaluate the opinions or ideas of others. People change and grow personally from dealing with this type of positive conflict and team cohesiveness is created. Ultimately, “C-Type Conflict” results in a solution to the problem or agreement amongst team members.
Thompson, L. (2011). Making The Team A Guide For Managers. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Stewart, G., Manz, C., & Sims, H., (1999). Teamwork and Group Dynamics. New York: Wiley. pp. 70- 125.
workplace include greater total resources, greater knowledge band and a greater source of ideas. However, these advantages can also bring on conflict within teams and the entire workplace. Varney (1989) reported that conflict remained the number one problem within a large company. This was after several attempts were made to train management in conflict resolutions and procedures. However, the conflict remained. The conflict possibly remains because the managers and leaders did not pay attention to the seriousness of the issue. In order to maintain an effective team, leaders and team members must know and be proactive in the conflict resolution techniques and procedures.
Now that we have defined conflict, looked at the different reasons conflict occurs and the positive and negative aspects, and some strategies to manage conflict, we can have a better understanding of potential causes and signs of conflict. As a result, we can recognize and manage the conflict effectively to have a positive and beneficial affect on team performance.
Look up the word conflict in the dictionary and you will see several negative responses. Descriptions such as: to come into collision or disagreement; be at variance or in opposition; clash; to contend; do battle; controversy; quarrel; antagonism or opposition between interests or principles Random House (1975). With the negative reputation associated with this word, no wonder people tend to shy away when they start to enter into the area of conflict. D. Jordan (1996) suggests that there are two types of conflict: good, which is defined as cognitive conflict (C-type conflict) and, detrimental, defined as affective conflict (A-type conflict). The C-type conflict allows for creativity, to pull together a group of people with different opinions or ideas, to combine and brain storm all thoughts to develop the best solution for the problem. The A-type conflict is the negative form when you have animosity, hostility, un-resolveable differences, and egos to deal with. The list citing negative conflicts could go on forever. We will be investigating these types of conflicts, what managers can do to recognize conflict early, and what strategies they can use to resolve conflicts once they have advanced.
Along with the preparation for conflict resolutions, understanding the situation in the team during the conflict is important. Clarifying positions along with listing the facts and all the necessary analyzation of the particular situation helps in resolving the conflict in a team. Applying this process can effectively address and resolve the conflict in a
Conflict is a basic aspect of teamwork (Levi, 2001), since the number of decisions that a team needs to make often evokes feelings of discomfort and stress. Conflict very often arises from a clash of different working style, ideas, interests, needs, and wants. Team conflicts can be due to high stress level. It has been experienced that in teamwork there can be conflicts and conflicts creates dissatisfaction among the employees. It is important that conflicts be addressed in such a way that it has adverse effect and it is very important to address the conflicts on the spot otherwise it would be difficult to handle the conflicts. (Jehn, 1995).When team member s disagree about the task themselves that how these tasks should be performed then task related conflicts occurs. It is also called task led-conflicts, it occurs when persons disagree over the understanding of tasks and their goals it is a disagreement between two team members in a group over the decisions. They have differences of opinions about a certain issue. (Stewart, Sims & Manz, 1999). Disagreement can be caused by differences in viewpoint and values, differences of opinion about tasks and differences in expectation about the impact of decisions (Levi, 2001).
[10]. Francis, Dave and Don Young, Improving Work Groups: A Practical Manual for Team Building. University Associates, Inc., San Diego, California, 1979.