Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors for measuring project success
Factors for measuring project success
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Factors for measuring project success
Abstract – Building teams is essential in almost every software project. People join hands on the basis of mutual interests, same desires, matching skills and ability to work together during the projects they undertake in their student life. More than in any other project, student projects have almost fixed and not extendable time boundaries and it is almost the key desire to develop teams and make them work in an effective manner. In industrial organizations and software industries it is most common as a knowledge that Team Software Process (TSP) is best practice that not only helps in effective team building but also support the delivery of quality projects on time and within budget. Numerous researches and Software Engineering Institute’s various articles indicate success in case of multiple projects and as noted by Watts Humphrey, current industry data show that more than one-third of all non-TSP software projects still fail [5].
The current research, realizing the need and effectiveness of TSP proposes its use in small teams present a framework for its adaptation
Keywords: Personal Software Process (PSP), Team Software Process (TSP), Small teams, Student final year project teams, Software Process management, Software Process Improvement.
I. INTRODUCTION
To improve the quality of work done by the developers at individual and team level, Humphrey developed the Personal Software Process (PSP) and Team Software Process (TSP). PSP shows software engineers how to plan and track their work, and how good and consistence practice of time management, good software engineering practices and data tracking can lead to high-quality software. In an interview Humphrey states that “Developers using PSP improve the quality of their work at...
... middle of paper ...
.... [8]. David Webb, Watts Humphrey, “Using the TSP on the
Task View Project” by Carnegie Mellon University. [9]. Adams, John D., "The Role of the Creative Outlook In
Team Building" edited by W. Brendan Reddy with Kaleel Jamison, pp 98-106 Virginia: Institute for Applied Behavioral Science and San Diego, California: University Associates, Inc., 1988.
[10]. Francis, Dave and Don Young, Improving Work Groups: A Practical Manual for Team Building. University Associates, Inc., San Diego, California, 1979.
[11]. Humphrey, Watts S. “Introduction to the team software process(sm)” Available at: citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.9 5.1928.pdf
[12]. http://www.rogerdarlington.co.uk/teamwork.html [13]. James Over, “Introduction to TSP” Software
Engineering Institute, CMU 2010. Available at: www.sei.cmu.edu/library/assets/presentations/Intro_ TSP_2010_06_27.pdf
Engleberg, Isa N. and Dianna R. Wynn. Working in Groups. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2012. Print.
Thomas, R. V. & Pender, D. A. (2007). Association for specialists in group work: Best
University of Washington. (2013). Four (Five) Stages of Team Development – Bruce Tuckman. Retrieved April 2014, from University of Washington: depts.washington.edu/oei/resources
...erstanding of Teams. In N. Natalie (Ed), Teamwork: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp.22-30). Basingstoke, Hampshire, Palgrace Macmillan.
Larson, C. and LaFasto, F. (1989), Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 451-483.
Toseland, R & Rivas, R 2012, An Introduction to group work practice, 7th edn, Allyn & Bacon, Massachusetts.
Engleberg, I., Wynn, D., & Schuttler, R., (2003). Working in Groups: Communication Principles and Strategies (3rd ed.) Boston: Houghton- Mifflin. pp. 146- 170.
A work team will be defined for the purposes of this paper by a definition borrowed from Bateman and Snell (2004). A team is formed of people (usually a small number) with complementary skills who trust one another and are committed to a common purpose, common performance goals, and a common approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable. Teams generally see themselves and are seen by others as a social entity, which is interdependent because of the tasks performed as members of a group.
This paper has the intention to explain what Rational Unified Process (RUP) is like an IBM product and a CASE tool. After is explained what phases it has, what are the most common extensions thus what are its workflows more used. The Rational Unified Process (RUP) is a software design method created by the Rational Software Corporation and now is part of IBM developer software. This paper describes how to deploy software effectively. The Rational Unified Process (RUP) use commercially proven techniques, and is a heavy weight process, and hence particularly applicable to larger software development teams working on large projects.
Parker, G. (2009). Team Leadership: 20 Proven Tools for Success. Amherst MA: Human Resource Developement.
Organizations use teamwork because it increases productivity. This concept was used in corporations as early as the 1920s, but it has become increasingly important in recent years as employ...
Teamwork is one of the important component that is required in any types of business organization . Team is defines as “a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to the common purpose, performance goal, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable”(katzenbach and Smith 1993) . Teamwork offer numbers of advantages like in teamwork work are completed earlier because large task are divided into smaller projects and then it find out an individual who is best for doing the jobs. Tasks that are smaller in size also need less time and brainpower then the work is less sporting to the people who are working. Teamwork also helps in combing the unique skills of people and makes them work efficiently. In a teamwork strength of different people are combined for the benefit of entire team and to produce better product and teamwork also help in building the unity among the group member .In a teamwork relationship play an important role because it helps people to communicate properly with one another whereas friendship helps in creating a job satisfaction. Support system is also important because if support system will be stronger than people will be comfortably depend on each other. These are the advantage of the teamwork but in teamwork there are also disadvantage like in teamwork there is an uneven participation of the members because they depend on other for doing the majority of work this can lead to hatred in the workplace. In a teamwork everyone is not team player, as they cannot perform well while team is working because they want to do there own so they might face problems to get fitted in a certain work culture, which will result in displeasure. In teamwork there is less creativity among th...
The above essay gives clear idea about the teamwork. There are different types of team in the organization, which is very essential for the business. The theories of belbin (1993), Tuckman and Jensen (1977) shows the nine teams role and five stages of development which are very important for any team building and also in belbin theory there is practical example of the company who used the nine team role and win the award and tuckman theory has been criticed by authors, and the example of teamwork given by Apple Inc. Ceo Steve jobs and Microsoft shows important of teamwork in their organization. Therefore I came to the conclusion that teamwork is a for the organization and very helpful in achieving the task on time.
Team approach shrinks a large complex issue or opportunity into several smaller parts where it can be solved in parallel. Once fall fragments into individual tasks, and are appointed for individuals to carry out assigned tasks, but where are the systems in place to keep track of the work done by the members of the team mode. This approach will allow the project manager to focus on the project as a whole and ensure that all tasks are being integrated