Group Participation and Interaction Explored in 12 Angry Men

1101 Words3 Pages

Stop for a moment and think how many times have you said “I'll kill you” to a person and actually killed that person? Two times? Three times? We all know that the answer is never unless of course you're actually a killer. This is what might or might not have happened with the boy who was accused of killing his father in the movie 12 Angry Men. Firstly, let's consider on the title of the movie itself which says “12 Angry Men.” Twelve is indicating the number of group members, angry is indicating the state of their temper, and men indicating their gender. So the title of the movie strongly connects to the name of the class “Group Communication Studies” because both involve a group, a goal and communication among the group members in order to achieve a common goal. The 96 minute film is all about a group of jurors sitting in a room on a very hot day to decide the fate of an 18 year old boy. Each judge had to come up with a decision— either the boy is guilty or not guilty of killing his father with a switch blade knife. The entire movie theme revolves around the group and how it completes its task. The group is so much involved in the discussion and there are so many conflicts that the members even forget to introduce themselves, hence the audience has to remember them by numbers of the order of their seating arrangement. This movie is a perfect detailed and visual example of how a group forms and develops over time, and most importantly the personality and approach of Jury number 8 gives an idea about how important it is to participate, speak up, and take a stance even in the early stages of the group formation. Each member's involvement and contribution to the group goal is important as it can reshape and change the dimensions of o... ... middle of paper ... ...irrespective of what majority says. Your participation has the ability to change what others think completely. Due to Jury number 8's participation, the ratio of 1:11 votes(not guilty:guilty) changed to an over all vote of not guilty. Communication doesn't happen non-verbally right at the beginning stages of the group development. If the movie was “11 Angry Men” with Jury number 8 excluded, the other jurors would've done just given vote once, and decided the fate of the boy. Why did the group make its decision not guilty? The answer is plain and simple: “Due to group participation and interaction.” If you were in the place of juror number 8 or any other juror, would you've spoken for the boy or not? Works Cited Engleberg, Isa N. and Dianna R. Wynn. Working in Groups. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2012. Print.

Show More
Related

  • Analytical Essay On 12 Angry Men

    639 Words  | 2 Pages

    The book “12 Angry Men” by Reginald Rose is a book about twelve jurors who are trying to come to a unanimous decision about their case. One man stands alone while the others vote guilty without giving it a second thought. Throughout the book this man, the eighth juror, tries to provide a fair trial to the defendant by reviewing all the evidence. After reassessing all the evidence presented, it becomes clear that most of the men were swayed by each of their own personal experiences and prejudices. Not only was it a factor in their final decisions but it was the most influential variable when the arbitration for the defendant was finally decided.

    Read More

  • Stereotypes In Twelve Angry Men

    804 Words  | 2 Pages

    Juror Eight stood up for what he believed in against eleven other jurors, and eventually influenced them all to reach the verdict of not-guilty. At the end of the case, when the jury is about to come to a final decision, Juror Eight says to Juror Three “It’s not your boy. He’s somebody else.

    Read More

  • 12 Angry Men Consensus Analysis

    1168 Words  | 3 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men is a depiction of twelve jurors who deliberate over the verdict of a young defendant accused of murder, highlighting many key communications concepts discussed throughout the semester. One of these concepts was the perspective of a true consensus, the complete satisfaction of a decision by all parties attributed. An array of inferences were illustrated in the movie (some spawning collective inferences) as well as defiance among the jurors. Each of these concepts play a role endorsing, or emphasizing the other. We can analyze the final verdict of the jurors and establish if there was a true consensus affecting their decision. In turn, we can analyze the inferences during the deliberation and directly link how they affect the consensus (or lack thereof). Defiance among the jurors was also directly

    Read More

  • Analysis of 12 Angry Men

    1246 Words  | 3 Pages

    In viewing 12 Angry Men, we see face to face exactly what man really is capable of being. We see different views, different opinions of men such as altruism, egoism, good and evil. It is no doubt that human beings possess either one or any of these characteristics, which make them unique. It is safe to say that our actions, beliefs, and choices separate us from animals and non-livings. The 20th century English philosopher, Martin Hollis, once said, “Free will – the ability to make decisions about how to act – is what distinguishes people from non-human animals and machines 1”. He went to describe human beings as “self conscious, rational, creative. We can fall in love, write sonnets or plan for tomorrow. We are capable of faith, hope and charity, and for that matter, of envy, hated and malice. We know truth from error, right from wrong 2.” Human nature by definition is “Characteristics or qualities that make human beings different from anything else”. With this said, the topic of human nature has been around for a very long time, it is a complex subject with no right or wrong answer. An American rabbi, Samuel Umen, gave examples of contradictions of human nature in his book, Images of Man. “He is compassionate, generous, loving and forgiving, but also cruel, vengeful, selfish and vindictive 3”. Existentialism by definition is, “The belief that existence comes before essence, that is, that who you are is only determined by you yourself, and not merely an accident of birth”. A French philosopher, Jean-Paul Sartre, is the most famous and influential 20th - century existentialist. He summed up human nature as “existence precedes essence”. In his book, Existentialism and Human Emotions, he explained what he meant by this. “It means that, first of all, man exists, turns up, appears on the scene, and, only afterwards, defines himself. If man, as the existentialist conceives him, is indefinable, it is because at first he is nothing. Only afterward will be something, and he himself will have made what he will be 4”. After watching 12 Angry Men, the prominent view on human nature that is best portrayed in the movie is that people are free to be whatever they want because as Sartre said, “people create themselves every moment of everyday according to the choices they make 5”.

    Read More

  • 12 Angry Men Archetypes

    410 Words  | 1 Pages

    Reginald Rose’s purpose in writing Twelve Angry Men was to shift society’s perception by demonstrating the fractures of the Judicial System and by gathering twelve men from different backgrounds to use their individual knowledge to solve a manslaughter case. Rose plays with archetypes and symbolism throughout the whole play, therefore he uses jurors to represent society during the 1950’s.

    Read More

  • Sociological Processs In The Film Twelve Angry Men

    819 Words  | 2 Pages

    Conformity due to normative influence reveals itself from the beginning of the film. After the trial adjourns the twelve jurors come together in a hot small room and take a preliminary public vote by a show of hands. Eleven jurors vote guilty and juror #8 votes not guilty in the case of murder. Normative influence was showed by several jurors who seemed hesitant and apprehensive of their vote, but gave into the norms and pressures of the group and voted guilty. Specifically, you can see the normative influence having an impact on juror #9 and his decision. As the jurors rose there hands the camera zooms out allowing you a complete view of all the jurors voting...

    Read More

  • Juror 8 12 Angry Men

    453 Words  | 1 Pages

    “Twelve Angry Men” is a dramatic play written by Reginald Rose. A young Puerto Rican man is put on trial for stabbing his father with a knife, and a stubborn jury is forced to decide his fate. Twelve jurors debate for hours until one by one, each juror is convinced of the defendant’s innocence. Juror eight, the protagonist, tries to prove the boy innocent, while the antagonist, juror three, and the rest of the jury try to change his mind.

    Read More

  • Innocent Judged By Ignorants

    1446 Words  | 3 Pages

    "The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy. " Said John Jay, first president of the United States Supreme Court. Society in the last couple of decades has improved when it comes to take decisions that punish criminal acts. There are certain ways to decide whether an individual is guilty or not, these decisions are taken by judges in court but is has not always been that way. Courts all over the world decided that the best way to be impartial when taking a decision was to choose unrelated individuals from any ethnicity or group as a jury. This is better known as Jury of peers. It suggests that individuals chosen from a wide group of social and ethnical roots could take a more ethical and impartial decision about a court case. This jury of peers was later in history proven to be not as accurate since factors like emotions, groupthink and personal interests came into play when taking a decision. Twelve Angry Men, movie from the 1957´s, written by Reginald Rose and Directed by Sidney Lumet explains in depth what jury of peers is all about. It shows that this type of justice is not effective by giving an in depth tour of possible factors and scenarios that surround the twelve angry men jury. An in depth critical examination of the movie will be made to support the abolishment of jury of peers. This kind of justice method is an unexamined tradition. It should be abolished because it is not effective, instead it becomes ineffective since its based in empirical evidence, not real in depth research. It is thought as normal since it has always been used in history but it is not often seen from a critical thinker point of view. To begin, there must be a clear definition of what is expected from a jury w...

    Read More

  • Juror 8 12 Angry Men

    668 Words  | 2 Pages

    The movie, 12 Angry Men, portrays the decision-making process of a case involving twelve men as the jury. Some have clear bias while others have the sincere goal of justice being served. In the beginning, 11 jurors were ready to give a guilty verdict before the details of the case were explored. However, the two men with the most complex relationship are Juror 3 and Juror 8. Juror 3 and Juror 8 are the two characters in 12 Angry Men that drive the plot along, although their persistent conflicting views stemming from differences in backgrounds, behaviors and attitudes cause them to constantly clash.

    Read More

  • 12 Angry Men

    894 Words  | 2 Pages

    Socially acceptably at the beginning was to vote guilty but then it swifts to pledging non-guilty as the initial leader jury number eight starts to persuade the crowd. Jury number nine made the courage action to be the first one to follow jury number eight. "There is nothing for him to tell you. He didn't change his vote. I did" said jury number nine after someone else was wrongly accused of changing his vote on the secret ballot instead of him.

    Read More

  • A Summary of 12 Angry Men

    1009 Words  | 3 Pages

    Juror#12 was the peacemaker of the group. When he sees’s others fighting, he tries to break them up and solve the problem. He goes around and talks with some of the jury’s, but they all ignore him. His first vote was that the boy was guilty, but after listening to what guy number 8 had to say he changed his vote.

    Read More

  • Groupthink In The Film Groupthink

    407 Words  | 1 Pages

    1. In this film, where 11 out of total 12 jury members voted accused as guilty and eager to leave the room at the earliest. Some of the jury members were so rigid to even re-think over their decision without even realising that this can take up the accused life. In such a situation group members become so confident and failed to think realistically than the phenomenon of ‘GroupThink’ occurs.

    Read More

  • Role Of Organizational Behavior In 12 Angry Men

    1535 Words  | 4 Pages

    Juror #8 was the only one that believed that the suspect was not guilty. He believed that the young man had a hard life and that there were some questionable details about the case that warranted careful deliberation. The jury’s group dynamics were poor because they were arguing, had their own motives, and wanted to be done with the case, which led to groupthink.

    Read More

  • Film Analysis: Movie Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

    1497 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the end when a vote is taken there is only one juror, Juror 3, who votes guilty. Finally he too changes his opinion and realises that his strained relationship with his son shouldn’t be brought into the case and votes not guilty. Hence the Jury unanimously decides that the boy should be acquitted.

    Read More

  • Reflection On 12 Angry Men

    1301 Words  | 3 Pages

    In class we have watched the movie 12 Angry Men. The movie is about a jury of twelve men deciding whether a boy will go to the death penalty or go out the doors a free man. The case seems clear to many that the boy is guilty of killing his father. Two witnesses testified against the boy, which made eleven of the men convinced that the boy was obviously guilty. When the twelve men headed inside the conference room to discuss the verdict, all of the men except one juror raised their hand for guilty. The one juror wanted to discuss the outcome before he sent a boy to die. The eleven other jurors were extremely upset because they felt as if they were wasting time discussing something that was so obvious.

    Read More

More about Group Participation and Interaction Explored in 12 Angry Men

Open Document