Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Society in hedda gabler
Hedda gabler character analysis
Hedda gabler character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Every person within a society is the product of his own social status and the actions his status lead him to undertake. “Hedda Gebler” by Henrick Ibsen, and “Punishment” by Rabindranath Tagore are two texts which display the profound idea that our social status is the foremost important factor which influences our decision making and also may corrupt our morals. If we analyze the two texts together we see that both Hedda in “Hedda Gabler” and the characters in “punishment” look forward to happiness but they are unable to receive it because of their particular society. On the one hand, Hedda’s arrogance, her decision to manipulate and devalue others, her unmerited action to burn Loveborg’ s manuscript, her unhappy marriage to Tesman, her suicide etc. are all fostered from her views of class superiority. She certainly thinks the way she grew up or the way she lives is superior to all others, thus she has the quality to control others. On the other hand, within ‘Punishment’, Dukhiram’s sudden action to kill his wife, Chidam’s decision to convince his wife, Chandara to take the blame for Radha’s murder, and Chandara’s acceptance of the false accusation that is befallen upon her are all resulted because of their lower social status. They are inclined to take unjust decisions/actions either because they are angry of the way they are being treated in society or because their hopes can never go along with the social standards. Overall, these texts provide the notion that our social position may hold us back from taking the right actions by which not only can we wrong others, but also dispose ourselves to face injustice. The class system in our society and the environment we grow up in significantly shapes our social beliefs, our behavior... ... middle of paper ... ...ld and current social standings. Conversely, in “Punishment” the characters are forced to make unjust actions because of their inferiority against the social standards. The characters’ actions or decisions from the two texts display the idea that regardless of our social standing, our actions are limited by the society. It teaches us that we should obey by the social rules if it is just and we must always reason our decisions based on the potential outcomes or we will put others and ourselves on danger. Works Cited 1. Ibsen, Henrick. “Hedda Gabler”. The Norton Anthology of world literature (3rd edition, Volume E) ed. Martin Puncher. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2012. 782- 838. 2. Tagore, Rabindranath. “Punishment”. The Norton Anthology of world literature (3rd edition, Volume E) ed. Martin Puncher. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2012. 893- 898.
Many people everyday worry how they’ll be seen in the world. You will either be loved for being the ideal person, or live a life of shame and sorrow because you chose or have to be different than others. I believe that the theme of the story is best represented as, Don’t conform to society, allow society to conform to you. In the tragedy genre short story “The Scarlet Ibis” written by James Hurst we receive a first hand account of how cruel a society can be. Doodle died only because someone tried too hard to change someone who didn’t want as much to be changed. The opinions of society can completely alter how one’s life will play out.
Stereotypes within our society have shaped the way we perceive each other. Throughout the book Punished by Victor Rios, a lot of stereotypes were not only reinforced but also used against a lot of the boys. A lot of the boys presented throughout the book had never actually committed a crime but they were treated as if they had. These boys were constantly labeled and categorized, like folders into a filling cabinet or a bin. Sure Oakland, California had a lot of gang-infested areas but that does not mean everyone in that area is part of a gang or is committing a crime. Thus, this book really demonstrates how one can be perceived or labeled as a criminal due to his or her surroundings and how these stereotypes can destroy one’s chance of freedom.
That Henrik Ibsen as a realist writer portrays Hedda as the epitome of a Victorian housewife restricted by Victorian values and confined into a loveless marriage, while being forced to watch as men take her life under their arm. However, Hedda Gabler continuously illustrates these psychological processes of fear and courage, she portrays herself fearless but not courageous, distinguishing the concept of a fearless person rather than someone who is courageous. While Hedda Gabler shows a cold-fearless exterior, she is in heart a coward as she lives through other people, instead of taking her own life into her hands. She hides behind her audacity and Ibsen notes “…Because I have such a dread of scandal. Yes, Hedda, you are a coward at heart. A terrible coward” (Ibsen 40).Her acts are determined by her own disposition as she believes she should be fearless, contaminated by her own criticism she find herself reluctant to believe that her life could change from mediocrity in a Victorian society. She titles herself fearless but by doing so she loses courage to face her repressed fears and takes no responsibility for something she believes she has no control over. Stanley J. Rachman’s Fear and Courage: A Psychological Perspective observes bomb-disposable operators long experience of fear when jumping as they move from courage to
Ibsen, Henrik. Hedda Gabler. Four Major Plays. Trans. James Arup. Ed. James McFarlane. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998.
Ibsen, Henrik. “Hedda Gabler”. Trans. Rold Fjelde. IBSEN Four Major Plays: Volume I. New York: Signet Classic, 1992.
Dostoevsky, Feodor. Crime and Punishment. Trans. Jessie Coulson. Ed. George Gibian. New York: Norton, 1989.
Everyone has faults, some people are greedy, some don’t know how to use manners, and others neglect a person’s feeling all together. Most of the time people just have one “fault” that they try to get better at. In Hedda’s case, she has all three problems but she encourages them instead of trying to learn to control them. In the play Hedda Gabler the author Henrik Ibsen shows that Hedda’s ill-behaved manners, greed for power and lack of emotional understanding of others will come back and bite her in the butt.
In today’s society people are viewed as being in different classes depending on how much money they bring in. The categorization of people is known as classism. Classism is simply the prejudice or in favor of people belonging to a particular social class. Classism is known as one of the largest social problems plaguing the world today. Classes are formed according to how the rules of the following institutions; government regulations and economic status. It is held in place by a system of beliefs and cultural attitudes that ranks people according to their; economic status, family lineage, job status, and level of education. There are three major classifications to which people are titled. They include upper or high class which includes the people with the most money. The middle class who includes the people that brings home the average income. Finally, the class titled the lower class that includes the people who have only one income coming in or none at all (“What Is Classism.”). In the classrooms these classes still remain and the students within each class have different ways in which they learn, and view schooling. We as educators have to look passed their ways and address each class the same.
While it can not be argued that Hedda is the perfect tragic victim in all ways, one must also consider that the same could be said for a great many characters in other plays and works of writing that we consider to be tragic. Even though she may display certain characteristics that do not fit perfectly with Aristotle’s definition it can not and should not be said that she is anything but a tragic victim. This meshing together of original ideas and classic conventions toward tragedy make Hedda as a character and Hedda Gabler as a play into something that is relatable, vivid and multi-dimensional.
Foucault, Michel. “Discipline and Punish.” Literary Theory: An Anthology-Second Edition. Ed. Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan. Malden, Massachusettes: Blackwell Publishing, 2004. 549-566.
Hedda Gabler in Henrik Ibsen's play Hedda Gabler is a headstrong, passionate woman. Hedda comes from an aristocratic family, marrying George Tesman solely for his prospects as he is of bourgeois class. On their honeymoon instead of spending time with one another, George spent most of his time in libraries doing research for his book. “Just think, Aunt Julie-I had that whole suitcase stuffed full of notes. You just can’t imagine all I’ve managed to find, rummaging through archives. Marvelous old documents that nobody knew existed-”(Ibsen 1.224). Hedda is a woman who wants a beautiful life, a life where she is successful and well placed in society, even if that means having an unhappy home life. She will do anything in her power to get what she
This quote means more to me than her conversation with Brack, it means that her story is a pause to consider, to change, and to keep going. Ibsen was not a feminist leader, or a trailblazer for the Woman’s Rights Movement. He was solely focused on helping the “social conditions for the under privileged genders and classes” (Hammer). Despite not actively seeking a role, Ibsen became a theatrical leader in feminism when he created the switch from theatrical melodramas to productions that reflected a daily life. He created what are called “woman’s plays”, one of which is Hedda Gabler. Hedda Gabler makes us look into the roles of men and woman at the time and makes it abundantly clear why Hedda has such a difficult time in her life and how it socially
In Crime and Punishment suffering plays a major role in the story and guides the reader his attention throughout the entire book “Crime and Punishment” by Fyodor Dostoyevsky. Suffering is the up and coming theme of this work. It twists itself into so many aspects of the story.The main character Rodion and Raskolnikov is the one who suffers from suffering in the very beginning of the novel until the final point . He feels very pessimistic about his own life the things and people that find a way around him. Rodion doesn’t authentically appreciate the way he lives and what does he come to. He suffers an immensely big deal because of the unwilling to spend and his helpless. Raskolnikov execrates that his
Henrik Ibsen. Hedda Gabler. Trans. Edmung Goose and William Archer. Stilwell, KS: Digireada.com Publishing, 2005.
The character of Hedda Gabler in Ibsen’s play is a unique and extraordinary person. There has been a lot of public dislike towards her and seen as a very manipulative, cold and even masculine portrayal of a woman. As stated by Jones “has imagination, and an intense appetite for beauty, she has no conscience, no conviction: with plenty of cleverness, energy, and personal fascination she remains mean, envious, insolent, cruel in protest against others ' happiness, fiendish in her dislike of inartistic people and things, a bully in reaction from her own cowardice." (2). Her personality was considered to be too different for the time that she lived in; it was seen as obstinate, and people went as far as to say she was less of a woman for the way