Character Analysis Of Ibsen's Hedda Gabler

1815 Words4 Pages

The character of Hedda Gabler in Ibsen’s play is a unique and extraordinary person. There has been a lot of public dislike towards her and seen as a very manipulative, cold and even masculine portrayal of a woman. As stated by Jones “has imagination, and an intense appetite for beauty, she has no conscience, no conviction: with plenty of cleverness, energy, and personal fascination she remains mean, envious, insolent, cruel in protest against others ' happiness, fiendish in her dislike of inartistic people and things, a bully in reaction from her own cowardice." (2). Her personality was considered to be too different for the time that she lived in; it was seen as obstinate, and people went as far as to say she was less of a woman for the way …show more content…

And if so, who was she? The suggested solutions to this problem are numerous, and opinions are abundant. “Ibsen’s love letters to Emilie Bardach, the 18-year-old woman that Ibsen had met in the summer of 1889, many believed that this young was the model for Hedda. A historian by the name Halvdan Koht suggested that Ibsen modelled Hedda after an actress he had met in Munich called Alberg, which is an anagram for Gabler. Most in the literary world have rejected the notion of a real-life model for Hedda Gabler. Michael Meyer, a translator and author, suggested that Hedda was a more of an unconscious self- portrayal, showing the more repressed and crippled side of Ibsen’s emotional life” (Nilsen 1). Ibsen had a few references to the future, a future that Hedda would never be a part of, he tried very hard in the play to make the audience see Hedda as entirely rational in the beginning and then hopefully pick up the subtext that would indeed start revealing the true nature of the situation. Ibsen was conceiving her as a powerful and energetic character, he frequently used terms in describing her, that when taken together, create a good final product: “attraction”, “aspiration”, “drawn”, “demand”, “desperation”, or even “hysteria”. (Jones 8). Ibsen is hailed as the ‘father of modern drama’ while Freud is known as the ‘father …show more content…

Throughout the play, there is a feeling that the room gets darker and less lively with the piano removed as well. The play takes a turn to Hedda being more clear and intentional with her manipulations. She is very bored and irritated in her general life. Her obsessive nature to cause trouble and trying to control everything is evident very early on in the play. She starts out in a quite middle-class setting and seems very annoyed at Tesman, she does not want to be close to him, yet they just returned home from their honeymoon which is supposed to be the most romantic thing at the beginning of marriage, but hers seems just tolerable. She appears to enjoy the fact that Tesman gets worried about the competition with Lovborg, it appears to give her new “fun” activity in her life. There are parts of the play that lean towards Hedda seeming slightly hysterical or bipolar as she goes from being bored and calm to loading pistols as if it is not a big deal and then grasps Thea wildly announcing her expectations for Lovborg. She seems obsessed with trying to control those around her because she has no other “outlet” to her life. Physically, she is repelled by marital sex and, however, flirtatious with the Judge, frightened by extramarital affairs. Like so many women, she is left miserable among the

Open Document