Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of geoffrey chaucer
Geoffrey chaucer the wife of bath character analysis
Geoffrey chaucer the wife of bath character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of geoffrey chaucer
Social Slights
Humans, by nature, crave what they do not have and it is in human nature to then try and obtain said thing. Often, the craving can be called “ambition” and the characteristic is not always seen as a negative attribute. However, being ambitious in nature has the potential to become negative. This may occur when the yearn to obtain something overtakes a person's yearn to keep their various commitments. Characters of Geoffrey Chaucer's Canterbury Tales do just this as they consistently ignore significant social obligation in favor of personal gain.
A number of those in Canterbury Tales are bound to each other through a sense of community, however, this bond does not stop them from actively pursuing their own interests – often at the expense of their community. “The Reeve's Tale” tells of a miller, a sly, thieving villain that was “as proud as any peacock and as gay”. The miller steals “outrageously” from a college manciple who laid “sick in bed” and from “all the and land about”. This land includes a college called “Solar Hall” (Chaucer 125-127). The miller feels no guilt when he steals for his own personal gain as can be told from the fact that he stole things in great number from the various members in his community including the sick. Two young men of the college felt significantly slighted and craved revenge. All of this resulted in the the miller having his wife and his daughter “plumped”, the two men having half of their flour initially stolen and the miller being viciously beaten. It was not only the miller in the Canterbury Tales that disregarded his communal obligations, though. In “The Miller's Tale” the carpenter had allowed a student, “Nicholas the Gallant”, to lodge in his home. This student of the star...
... middle of paper ...
... my cousin and sworn friend”, Palamon and Arcite still engage in a vicious battle over the object of both their affections, Emily (Chaucer 50). Both Arcite and Palamon put their familial obligations to each other aside as they “fought each other at amazing length” (Chaucer 63). It was then decided by the king that “a year later.../Each shall return.../Ready to battle to decide his claim/To Emily” (Chaucer 69). This ended with “Arcite...[being] swept/ Out of the saddle and pitched upon his head” (Chaucer 91). Arcite perished because of this destructive fight and it was due to both Palamon and Arcite's disregard of their familial obligations to each other.
Works Cited
Anderson, Robert, et. al. Elements of Literature: Sixth Course. Austin: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc., 1989. Print.
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales. London: Penguin Books, 1977. Print.
Source #3: Kennedy, X.J., and Dana Gioia. Literature An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. 9th. New York: Pearson Longman, 2005.
Booth, Alison, and Kelly Mays, eds. The Norton Introduction to Literature. 10th ed. New York: Norton, 2010.
Kirsznerand and Mandell, Literature: Reading, Reacting, Writing. Earl McPeek. USA: Harcout, Inc., 2001, 1997,1994,1991. 388-395
The Norton Introduction to Literature. Ed. Kelly J. Mays. New York: Norton, 2013. 1471 - 1534 -.
When they first met Emelye, they were incarcerated. Palamoun was the first to saw Emely from the tower while “he was lamenting for his fate, happens to look out a window; he cast his eyes in Emelye and cries out in pain” (1107). Palamoun felt in love with the goddess, as he first referred to her, that he saw and heard sing. He cries and claims because he thinks that she could be Venus and she could free them. Arcite notices his lamentation and tries to console him since he thinks he is depressed, and tries to convince him of their destiny. When Arcite discovers what was the real reason for Palamoun’s suffer, he also felt in love with Emelye as soon as he saw her, and declares that he must have her. “Palamoun is angered; he reminds Arcite that they are not only cousins but sworn brothers; he loved Emelye first and Arcite is duty bound to help him” (1123). Later on, Arcite returns to Athens unrecognizable because of the love-sickness he suffered, willing to strive for Emelye’s love. At the same time, Palamoun find his way out of prison and hides into the woods. By circumstances, they encounter with each other, and after Palamoun finds out who was Arcite and what his intentions of returning were. “He leaps out and shouts that Arcite is a false traitor and that he, Palamoun, is his mortal foe” (1573). They are both willing to kill each other, anger has conquered them.
Literature: An Introduction to fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. Sixth. New York: Pearson Longman, 2010. 325-336.
Holman, C. and William Harmon, eds. A Handbook to Literature. New York: MacMillan Publishing, 1986.
Roberts, Edgar V., Literature: An Introduction to Reading and Writing, 4th Compact Edition, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2008, print
Meyer, M. (2013). Bedford introduction to literature: Reading, thinking, writing. Boston: Bedford Bks St Martin’s.
Edgar Roberts, Henry Jacobs. Literature: An Introduction to Reading and Writing. 1998. Ed. Leah Jewell, Vivian Garcia, and Melissa Casciano. 3rd ed. Upper Saddler River: Pearson Education, Inc., 2006.
The Language of Literature. Applebee N, Authur, et al. A Houghton Mifflin company 1996 pg. 1088
Roberts, Edgar V., and Robert Zweig. Literature: An Introduction to Reading and Writing, Compact Edition. N.p.: Pearson Education2012, 2012. Print.
Clugston, R. W. (2010). Journey into literature. San Diego, California: Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUENG125.10.2/sections/sec2.3
Kirszner, Laurie G., and Stephen R. Mandell. Literature: Reading, Reacting, Writing. Compact 8th. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011. Print.