Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Technology and young children
Technology and young children
Technology and young children
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Technology and young children
Today’s parents are overprotective of their kids, makes sense since six out of ten kids have access to the internet at home,"Home Computer Access and Internet Use." Child Trends. 2015. Web. 09 Feb. 2016. meaning 57 percent of kids ages three to seventeen are exposed to the things the internet has to offer. But parenting goes to another level when parents decide it's appropriate to cyber spy on their kids, checking their web browsing, social media activity, text messages. Parents shouldn’t violate their kids privacy and check their internet usage and social media because it will damage the relationship between kid and parent, hurt them mentally and because it’s wrong to invade their privacy. .
Cyber spying on kids builds trust issues between
…show more content…
Since when is technology required to do the parenting for the parents. Yalda Uhls, a developmental psychologist and media researcher, states in the new york post that spying on your kids doesn’t build an honest relationship between the parents and their kids and like any extreme parenting, they may rebel against it. Michael Brody, a child psychiatrist and head of media committee for the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, adds that parents and kids need a strong bond instead of the spying and monitoring on their social lives. "Is It Ever OK for Parents to Cyber-spy on Their Kids?" New York Post Is It Ever OK for Parents to Cyberspy on Their kids Comments. 2014. Web. 10 Feb. 2016. Another expert who disagrees with parents cyber …show more content…
So why would there be a need to invade your kid's privacy if it is really unlikely for them to actually be attacked by a sexual predator. And again, with a good talk and nice parenting from parents it can really be
The expansion of the Internet infrastructure across the world, has brought an increased audience. Which has provided expanded markets for businesses and exploited new opportunities. There are virtually countless social sites and media used by individuals to access and share experiences , content, insights, and perspectives. Parents today tend to believe they should spy on their kids online activity. I argue parents should respect the privacy of a child's social life and his/her internet activity.
Internet is advancing every day, parents have no idea what their kids are doing in cyberspace and are contemplating the idea of spyware. In the article, “The Undercover Parent” by Harlan Coben, he argues the idea of parents putting spyware on kids’ computer is a good idea to keep the child safe. Many American parents have no idea what happens in cyberspace; sex, bullying, and drugs. Parents are torn between protecting their child with spyware and allowing the child to have privacy. Coben uses his friends’ personal experiences to support his argument without leaving room for counterarguments. By using strong emotional appeals, weak qualifiers, and sugary word choice Coben creates a weak argument that lacks persuasion.
There are, after-all, ways to be an effective, inspiring, and supporting parent without spying on the child’s every online
Online predators, pornography, drug trafficking, piracy, and hate sites are just some of the dangers that a child can face on the internet. The article “The Undercover Parent” by Harlan Coben states that parents should use spyware to monitor their children. Coben argues that parents should be able to know what is in their children’s lives. he believes that spyware can prevent children from being targeted by internet predators on social networking sites and even prevent children from being cyber bullied. I agree with Coben’s claim that parents should consider using spyware as a protection for their teens online. There are many possible dangers facing children on the internet and it is essential that parents install spyware.
A news article called The Undercover Parent by Harlan Coben published in March 16, 2008 as a persuasive editorial where Coben argues how parents using spyware to spy on their kid’s internet history and how sometimes it might go too far. The author starts developing his argument by giving an anecdote of how one of his friends put spyware on their kid’s computer, and later on during the article Coben claims how parents can check up on their kids to see if they’re being cyber bullied or doing something inappropriate but shouldn’t cross the line of looking at their social status. Coben persuades other parents to get spyware to monitor their child’s behavior on the internet in order to make sure their parent know what
To begin with no technology is 100% secure, if the kids’ location can be visible to hackers, this information can be used to harm them. In the Article, Irvine mentions “Parents are notified by text message, e-mail, or phone” about their kids activities at school. This information is also risk as emails can be hacked, Imagine it can be used to kidnap kids of a rich or high official for ransom. Privacy is a serious matter, and hackers can also use technology to commit crimes against such families. Irvine says, “High-tech methods to track everything” are available, that's means that there is always someone watching. Irvine says, “Big Mother” or “Big Father” who is watching, but it can also be “Big Kidnapper” or “Big Sex Offender.” In other words, their kids will be under surveillance of many unknowns. Also anybody might forget their phone in public places and what if some crazy person got it? That person can use this information and see all the communication and find out where the kids are going. As a result, these devices can be tools for hackers to use to harm the kids...
In Harlan Coben’s article “The Undercover Parent” (2008), the author argues that installing spyware on children's devices is necessary, and not doing so, would be irresponsible parenting. Coben develops his claim by first explaining why precautions should be taken when installing parental control software. Then he provides his reasons as to why counterarguments don't apply to the situation. The author aims to forewarn the dangers of children's online activities and propose a solution to protect them. Coben writes intensely for parents to emphasize that children with unmonitored machines become vulnerable to harm.
“Maybe it’s the word: spyware. It brings up associations of Dick Cheney sitting in a dark room, rubbing his hands together and reading your most private thoughts”. In the article “The Undercover Parent”, writer and father, Harlan Coben argues that parents spying on teens is a good precaution to take. Coben was very indecisive on whether spyware was a good concept to use to find out things about your teen, though, in the end, he concluded that it was a good solution, but conditions had to be enforced. Coben illustrates the point that the internet is a dangerous place, not everything on the internet is private, and it's a parental responsibility to know what your child is doing. For the most part, I agree with Coben, but I still do disagree with
While not always seen, overall, teenagers get far less privacy than adults do. Between schools checking through the belongings of their students without solid evidence to allow it, or parents monitoring the activity of their children online, teenagers today are subject to much of their privacy being taken away. It is true that this can sometimes be helpful in busting drug dealers or keeping teenagers from getting involved with bad habits online. However, it can also have an adverse effect, ruining the relationship between a parent and his or her child, or other relationships throughout the rest of the teenager’s life. Teenagers should be allowed more privacy, if not as much as adults have, as it will keep them less fearful, as well as help to keep their interpersonal relationships strong and their emotions in a good state.
¨The Undercover Parent¨ by Harlan Coben, published in an online newspaper ¨New York Times¨ (16 March 2008), claims that the Internet is dangerous for kids. Harlan Coben explains how spyware could be a resource that keeps track of our kids’ internet use, but how it could also invade sons’ and daughters’ privacy. He also claims that parents should have conversations about their concerns with teens, and let them know spyware is a possibility. In my opinion, I quite agree and do not agree with the most of it.
There is no single method to perfect parenting. As such, it is up to the parents to decide how they involve themselves in their child’s life. In his essay, “The Undercover Parent,” Harlan Coben argues why spyware might be an effective tool for parents to monitor their children; however, he does not consider all the effects of and alternatives to using spyware. Parents should not use spyware to monitor their children because everyone has a right to privacy, independence fosters growth, and there are better alternatives to using spyware.
If they do not help their teenagers with safety tips on the Internet there could be many negative consequences. According to The Editorial Board, “Parents remain the first line of defense against cyberbullying. Too many, however, ignore their children 's online behavior, deny that their kids could be bullies, or are themselves models for this harmful behavior. The stepmother of the 14-year-old charged with bullying Rebecca was charged last week with child abuse over allegations that she punched two boys visiting her home”. This illustrates the importance of parents’ role in a teenager’s activity on the Internet. In this occasion Rebecca’s 14-yeaar-old cyberbully had actually been bullied by her stepmother. This could have been the cause of Rebecca’s bullying since her cyberbully perhaps was bullied by her own
Revolutionary dreams of fairness clash with harsh realities. In France, the rich thrived while the commoners struggled. In Haiti, slavery ended, but true equal rights remained elusive. These stories reveal a tough road to genuine equality. Body Paragraph #1
However, sensitive information that may be shared might later embarrass the children as they grow older and realize what is available on the internet. Such events may result in resentment and misunderstandings on both the children and the parents’ sides. According to Steinberg (2017) in “Sharenting: Children’s Privacy in the Age of Social Media,” there have been long-term issues and conflicts regarding parental sharing and whether children have the right to control what is shared about them. Another long-term problem raised by parental sharing is the idea of data collecting. Per “Children’s Privacy in the Big Data Era: Research Opportunities,” “These trends raise serious concerns about digital dossiers that could follow young people into adulthood, affecting their access to education, employment, healthcare, and financial services. Although US privacy law provides some safeguards for children younger than 13 years old online, adolescents are afforded no such protections” (Montgomery, Chester, & Milosevic, 2017, p.
These individuals feel that it is an invasion of the teenagers’ right to privacy and the development of their trustworthiness. Kay Mathieson states “only by giving children privacy will they come to see their thoughts as something that belongs to them – to which they have an exclusive right.” In the United States and according to the law, monitoring the internet usage of a minor does not break any laws and is a moral obligation of the parent. Trustworthiness is an important development of a child to learn in order to develop genuine relationships with others in the lifetime. “Not only does monitoring have the great potential to undermine the trust of the child in the parent, and thus to undermine trust in others more generally, it also has the potential to undermine the capacity of the child to be worth of trust” (Mathieson). If the parent has not already had conversations with the teenager about monitoring internet usage and the parent is not telling the child about the monitoring, there is already an issue with the development of trustworthiness in the teenager. There was already a failure of development of this skill before the internet or internet monitoring was introduced.