Is It Wrong? “It’s not you, it’s your social media” (Unknown). Employers all over the world use social media to find out more about the people they are employing. It may be discrimination but employers do not need social media to discriminate if they truly feel like it. The monitoring these employers and administrators do is always for the betterment of their college or business. Social media monitoring by administrators or employers should be acceptable because that information is public, you represent them, and certain subject matter can be detrimental to the company or school. The first reason why social media monitoring is acceptable is that the information you post is completely public. Some people would argue that their personal life …show more content…
Others who would not agree with the position would say who truly cares about what I post, the companies do. If you post you taking illegal substances or bad talking a co-worker, that is then how people are seeing the company. The world is all about images nowadays. If people wanted to keep things private back in the days, they just did not talk about it (Scherer). If you want something kept private do not talk about it. If you want a few people to know, personally tell them. “Since social media became popular, folks have continuously talked about how we need to teach people to not share what might cause them professional consternation” (Boyd). The things you post can sometimes be detrimental to you and the company you work for or school you attend. It does not matter if you do everything in your power to keep something private, anyone can screenshot or screen record that information and share it with someone else or somewhere else (Scherer). Privacy doesn’t exist on social media, your friends can post anything you post, making it open to even more people. Always be extra cautious about what you post, and always think, if you post it are you okay with it being on a billboard with your
Using the informal tone he enhances his argument by providing several thought-provoking statements that allow the reader to see the logic in the article, “Social media is designed for the information shared on it to be searched, and shared- and mined for profit… When considering what to share via social media, don 't think business vs. personal. Think public vs. private. And if something is truly private, do not share it on social media out of a misplaced faith in the expectation of privacy” (134). The reader should agree with Edmond that when posting or being a part of the social media bandwagon, you’re life and decisions will be up for display. Moreover, the business vs. personal and public vs. private point is accurate and logical, because evidently if you post something on any social media outlet you should expect that anyone and everyone can see it, regardless of your privacy settings. Edmond highlights that Facebook along with other social networking sites change their privacy settings whenever they please without
Most individuals use these social networks and applications as an outlet to connect with old friends and family, share media, and keep up with everyday topics. Sometimes, employees exchange social media accounts if they become friends at work, which is acceptable. But, if an employer decides to review an employee or potential employee’s personal account without their permission, that is an invasion of privacy. Also, a person’s social media account should not have to be monitored or reviewed by an employer, especially if it does not relate to the job itself. Everyone deserves privacy, and if an employee’s social media account(s) have to be monitored, the same should apply to the employers as
In the year 2016 almost everyone applying to a school or business has a social media account. College admission offices and businesses have the ability to check applicant’s social media before they accept them into their school or business. But they should not be looking at social media because it does not give an accurate portrayal of the person applying.
Social media companies have complete control a their users information and can do what they want with it. Now if those companies went spreading the information, no one would use their sites but they can make changes to privacy setting that make it easier for anyone to view information of other users. For example, Facebook has privacy settings so your information is not out for public viewing, but a while back they changed the default privacy setting to make all your information viewable to the public unless you changed it. There was an uproar and everyone felt they were trying to be sneaky about it because they did not give any notice when they did it, but Facebook claimed they were not trying to do anything fallacious. Social media companies have to be careful when doing anything with privacy settings because people get extremely defensive regarding their information. There is also a level of comfort that comes with age. The older generations have no trust when it comes to putting their information online. Most feel as if they are being tricked in some way. But the generation kids are growing up in now, all their trust is put in the internet. Kids and young adults will put all their information online because that is how the world functions. In today’s world, if you are not putting all your information online and using your phone and laptop to get everything done, you are inefficient. And this
I am a member of social networking sites- including Facebook and Twitter. In order to protect my reputation, I do not post as much as other social network users and if I do, I keep it short and inoffensive. In order to keep my reputation professional and trustworthy, I will only post general information that’s not personal and regular pictures that will not offend anyone or keep me from getting a job/position in the
Companies have determined what an employee does while at work or away from work on social media can greatly affect the company’s image. For example, the National Football League (NFL) has a code of conduct policy that holds employees of a team and organization accountable for the employee’s comments on social media. An employee, on their own time, is no longer a private entity, acting on their own accord without consequences from their employer. This new approach to managing a company’s image or message dictates how a company monitors and responds to acts, whether they are behavior, speech or actions they find inappropriate.
O'Shea, Kellie A. "Use Of Social Media In Employment: Should I Hire? Should I Fire?." Cornell HR Review
I don’t think we are truly, fully aware of the collective damage that social media is doing to our nerves and relationships with one another. We only show the good stuff, because we want to feel valuable. We want to feel important. We want to be respected. We want to fit in and stand out, at the same time. But you’re behind the scenes are more honest and beautiful than anything on social media. We feel as though just because we make our profile private only our friends can see what we post or share. We tend to let our guard down when it comes to social media, but little do we know that all
Book banning is getting out of control so badly, that Florida banned book banning for the most part, and Iowa is reinstating some books and banning other books like books about gays and how to kill off humanity by being gay. Social media is not any better than the book banning, because the social media part is like The Truman Show, whereas the book banning is like Fahrenheit 451. Anyways, in some ways, people who create social media are essentially watching their users, because most times, when an account is created, they’ll ask for an address, first and last name, gender, nationality, ethnicity, birthday, etc., so it’s essentially watching, even if they aren’t. So, people nowadays are way more out of control than they were in times like the Cold War, or
Using Social media for academic research is accelerating and raising ethical concerns along the way, as vast amounts of information collected by private companies – including Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and Twitter – are giving new insight to all aspects of everyday life.
A person’s right to privacy is being challenged with the high use of social media such as Facebook and Twitter. What used to be considered part of your personal life is not so personal anymore. When one chooses to share details about ones-self to their friends via a social media, they are not always thinking about the “other” people. The other people could be ones current boss or future employer. Other people could be a school official, your baseball coach, your friends’ mother; you name it the list goes on and on. Recently, a few employers or perspective employers have requested Facebook and other social network log-in information. It is probably a violation of equal employment laws, and there are two senators investigating the practice of requiring job applicants and employees to provide their social network log-in information as a condition of employment.
"There is most definitely a fine line between privacy and internet safety monitoring, for example, monitoring someone who utilizes social media to converse with friends and monitoring someone who utilizes social media to converse hurtful comments with one another for all to see. The essential pro of monitoring one‚Äôs social media would be that the negative comments being sought out towards one another would not happen as much because that person would know that the government and their state would have access to see what was conversed through their account. The con of monitoring one‚Äôs social media would be the reoccurring question ‚ ÄúCan it be done?‚Äù, because to most people it is nonetheless an invasion of their privacy. If there were
To what extent is it okay for the government to monitor your social media? Social media is one of the biggest platforms in our world today. This platform can lead many people to success, but it can also lead people to their demise. When it comes to having an outlet on which to express yourself, many choose to abuse it. One of these net abusing users happens to be the leader of our country. "North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un just stated that the 'Nuclear Button is on his desk at all times.' Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!" This tweet from President Trump is one of the many shock-worthy tweets that
First of all, schools should keep students focused during classes. By giving students access to social media for anything in the class, that starts leading to these issues. “All universities have been struggling to balance freedom of speech and the right to express an opinion, with reasonable
I do not believe that the government should be able to monitor our Internet or social media content because what people do in their free time should be up to them and not the government. When a person creates a social media page, they should be given the freedom to do and say what they would like, as stated in the First Amendment. This could also be seen as an unnecessary violation of privacy, as stated in the Fourth Amendment which says that people have the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects as well as safe from unnecessary searches or seizures. Putting regulations on what people can or cannot find on the Internet creates a gray area of deciding what should or should not be censored in our everyday lives. If someone can make an