Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Amendment of freedom of speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Amendment of freedom of speech
To what extent is it okay for the government to monitor your social media? Social media is one of the biggest platforms in our world today. This platform can lead many people to success, but it can also lead people to their demise. When it comes to having an outlet on which to express yourself, many choose to abuse it. One of these net abusing users happens to be the leader of our country. "North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un just stated that the 'Nuclear Button is on his desk at all times.' Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!" This tweet from President Trump is one of the many shock-worthy tweets that …show more content…
Just one simple tweet can install fear into many heads across the country. If a leader is being allowed to release tweets like this, what impact could monitoring the rest of the world really have? The First Amendment in the Bill of Rights is the right for free speech. If the government decides to start closely monitoring our social media networks, wouldn't that violate our rights? In the Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union case, "...the Supreme Court held that the government can no more restrict a person’s access to words or images on the Internet than it can snatch a book out of someone’s hands or cover up a nude statue in a museum." (aclu.org) For the government to take away someone's privileges on social media, it is exactly the same as both of these examples. For the federal government to restrict our social media usage may be out of hand, but it is very sensible for our local governments to monitor our social media usage. In this day and age, cyberbullying is a very serious topic. Many people may remember the tragic story of Amanda Todd. She was among the many whose cyberbullying issues were failed to be
In Stephens article, he tells how “Social media could serve as a source of live, raw information. It could summon people to the streets and coordinate their movements in real time. And it could swiftly push back against spurious media narratives with the force of a few thousand retweets”. He explains how technology can be used to push to change problems in our society and encourage us to get up and do something about it. Being able to use our capabilities if technology to fullest is “A huge reason for all this success is that, perhaps more than any other modern American protest movement, they’ve figured out how to marshal today’s tools”. In McKinnon’s explanation, she states how “To their credit, some companies such as Apple, Microsoft, Google and Facebook have joined forces with civil liberties groups in an attempt to persuade the Obama administration not to push anti-encryption measures that would enable government and law enforcement officials to access our secure communications”. This is goes with how technology can be used to make a difference just like what Stephen was saying in order to inform people on what’s going on. McKinnon explains how our social media servers have also taken a disagreement on invading our private lives. As it stands, any individual or
President Obama insisted that the government is not invading privacy but is just looking for potential terrorist activities that can be thwarted by preemptive measures. Even after this statement by the President there are those who speculate that the government is "snooping" into their lives and monitoring their internet activity. Although there is this paranoia that the government is "watching", it may actually make people more aware of what they do on their computers and cause them to practice safer internet browsing techniques.
Whether the U.S. government should strongly keep monitoring U.S. citizens or not still is a long and fierce dispute. Recently, the debate became more brutal when technology, an indispensable tool for modern live, has been used by the law enforcement and national security officials to spy into American people’s domestic.
All the developed countries (developing countries are also in no way lagging behind) the incidence of the people being monitored under various surveillance systems is high of which closed circuit television system (CCTV) is gaining dominance. For instance, the UK has over 4.2 million of them, giving it a ratio of one for every 14 persons and the USA is reported to have been installing it on a rapid pace in every conceivable location as town centers, schools, public transportation systems etc with a spiraling budget estimated at $100 million. With the terrorists attacks looming large in the wake of 9/11 attacks and despite the killing of Osama Bin Laden, the trends are going towards more and more technology oriented surveillance methods. This has naturally caused widespread concerns about the privacy issues and necessitated more evidence based research to inform policy and practice.
Social media is everywhere and very popular all over the world. Social media is used on computers, tablets, smartphones, etc and along with the use of social media there are privacy issues that come along with it. Social media is part of everyone’s life and is hard to give up. Even though we might not think there is isn’t anything wrong with it, there is which comes down to our privacy. Our privacy is being invaded when using these popular networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, etc. Social media is here to communicate with others and build relationships not invade our privacy.
To begin, I strongly believe that social media makes use of surveillance to exploit its users by manufacturing desires, communities, and audiences. The goal of this type of media is almost entirely the generation of advertising revenue. Surveillance provides meaning of improving the efficiency of advertising and offering private information that can be exploited by these groups towards other ends. As Andrejevic (2002) suggests, this information is still private, and so it does not constitute the loss of privacy in the modern digital age. However, it place private information in the hands of private corporations. Such as, how it will be used, and how it can be used is a question of some debate. While Andrejevic’s work has proved remarkably prescient, he failed to predict the threats to privacy that might arise if these private corporations ever released their privately held information to other parties, such as the government (243). This has become a more crucial issues in recent years.
There is a reason that all of this has raised ethical concerns, and is because it is unlawful for big companies and government agencies to have the ability to monitor people, even if it’s through social
Through all the components of the Internet it becomes easy to transfer material that particular governments might find objectionable. However, all of these means of communicating on the Internet make up a large and vast system. For inspectors to monitor every e-mail, every article in every Newsgroup, every Webpage, every IRC channel, every Gopher site and every FTP site would be near impossible. Besides taking an extraordinary amount of money and time, attempts to censor the Internet violate freedom of speech rights that are included in democratic constitutions and international laws.11 It would be a breach of the First Amendment. The Constitution of the United States of America declares that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redr ess of grievances 12 Therefore it would be unconstitutional for any sort of censorship to occur on the Internet and affiliated services.
For example, this year Hillary Clinton was put under a microscope for the use of a private email address. When government officials learned that she had this extra email they scrutinized her continuously about it. Next, she was investigated to see if she had classified information on this email, not the private email that the government provides. This is another form of proof of the never ending government surveillance these days. Along with emails the government uses the combing through social media pages or profiles. Although most profiles of social media can be seen at all times on the internet. The government can make the private posts accounts available to themselves at all
The government has many other enforcement tasks to deal with of much greater importance than internet censorship. The Internet grows exponentially every day with new websites emerging every second, thus making the rules of censorship extremely difficult to enforce. Sometimes, accumulation of these challenges leads to poor enforcement of these laws. Decreased access to vital information becomes a problem because it is hard to erase all of the negative content that people deem offensive, without also getting rid of a plethora of useful information in the process. There are people that use the Internet for good fun and information but there are others who misuse it. Since the range is very wide that can offer both positive content and harmful content, it can pose a difficult problem for the government to make the correct decisions about what to eliminate and what to keep. Internet censorship is still an evolving science, the governor in agencies are limited in their ability to remove offensive or illegal content and not interrupting any vital information in the process. The censorship laws of the Internet function to either completely eliminate certain websites or trying to pick and choose on which approach to take while still leaving the useful information intact. So at what point is too much censorship,
Social medias have become a big part of our society now, they are being used in all aspects of our life. We are connected twenty-four hours a day, at work, school, home, shopping etc. There is a necessity, a need to be connected to these social media’s, to feel like you are a part of society. With these growing numbers in being connected to social media’s on the web, there comes a growing desire for privacy and safety. In this paper I will discuss and analyze the social media’s themselves, the dangers that arise from them, and how all these correlate to privacy.
as people should have their privacy when surfing the internet. Alternatively, the evidence suggests that the government can help tackle terrorism and stop bullying. After examining this issue closely, surely society could not argue that we should protect our country and our children by monitoring social networking sites? Works Cited http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/aug/09/cyberbullying-mother-fight-askfm http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/aug/19/ask-fm-cyberbully-hannah-smith-death http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/5046447/Facebook-could-be-monitored-by-the-government.html http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/aug/08/askfm-advertisers-cameron-boycott-cyberbullying http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=catfish
In the United States of America, the right to freedom of speech is protected constitutionally. Privacy is a concept which is protected only through laws, and is thus superseded by the constitutional freedom of speech in a court of law (Determann 1-2). The private companies which manufacture smartphones and operate social networks as well as the individuals who use these products and services retain this right, which places their actions over the interests of maintaining the privacy of others who use the technologies. Additionally, while users may look to social media companies such as Facebook to blame for invasions of privacy, it is often other users who are responsible for the breach. Most people are offended by the content uploaded by others, whether it is a picture or a revealing status update, which is not within the control of the company (Determann 2). Social media companies are responsible for enforcing and upholding their terms of service and ensuring that the rights of their users are not being infringed. They cannot violate these rights in the name of protecting
Nowadays, social media is playing a bit role in any digital marketing strategy, that is why monitoring your business social media is very important. As a company, you need to show your response to people, when they are communicating about your brand and understand how people perceive your business. Even if social media seems to be an easy tool, it is actually a hard work, as it takes a lot of time and effort, sometimes as well multiple employees. This blog post is to help you to plan how can you monitor your social media only in 10-20 minutes a day.
Social media has token a huge step from when it first started. The more the years go by there are new trends and new technology that continues to grow. As the newer technology comes out, the younger the kids are getting their hands on the new gadgets. As a result our younger generation begins to get into the internet having their own accounts to multiple social media websites. Kids don’t realize what they can get themselves into when they get an account, it can lead them to older people (child molesters, Perverts, ect.). Since 2011, teen Twitter use has grown significantly from 16% to 24% (Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2013). These social media accounts can make it easier to cyber bully there victim. Most importantly it takes away their