Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Computer technology advancement
Bias in the news essay
Technological advancement in the past 80 years
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Computer technology advancement
Pokharel 2 Sriya Pokharel Prof. Sharifian GOVT 2305 – 75431 04/30/2018 Assignment Three The technological advances we are seeing in the world today is unmatched. The world today is succeeding in fields, fields which few decades ago were not in human knowledge. Information of new successes and progress travels quickly around the world. All the knowledge we need is within our fingertips and we have multiple platforms available to help us learn more. The world is webbed with all kinds of information and people are trying to get more about all things. In this rapid progress it is very easy for sources to manipulate knowledge seekers. It is convenient for a lot of parties to spread fake news for their little benefits. Like all things good that have …show more content…
This news is very eye catching and often times convincing about the lies they want to support. There are various factors that pulls people towards this fake news. One of the major reason for the spread of fake news is the extensive use of social media. Social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Google, etc. are becoming a junction to connect people from all different kinds of backgrounds. The mass of people enjoying social media attracts the fake news sources that want to influence people to believe the lies. The news being published in social media is more accessible and can be followed easily on a regular basis. This is the reason most of us feel easy reading the news that randomly occur in our profile rather than actually looking for the facts. A news story published by The Wall Street Journal talks about the research done by Stanford University. The research was done to find out the capability of young adults to distinguish between fake and real news. The research showed that 88% of young adults acquire their news from social media rather than actually looking at credible news sources. [1] This data shows how easy it is to spread the fake news and reach out to more people by publishing these news on social media. These news not only spread false knowledge but also create a sense of fear or confidence about things that are not true at all. Acquiring little or no knowledge from these …show more content…
The quiz I took really helped me to understand the parts of news better. It also helped me to understand my weak points and my strong points while I read news. So, each time I read any news I will pay extra attention to see if I am letting any of my biases creating a hindrance in identifying the news as real or fake. Many nations, social media platforms have been raising voice against fake news and have introduced programs to try to eliminate fake news. We can also play our part in the fight against fake news by paying special attention to all our biases before reading any news. This will also help us fulfil our responsibility of a good citizen. References 1. WSJDigitalNetwork. “Study: 5 Most Students Cannot Distinguish Fake and Real News.” YouTube, YouTube, 22 Nov. 2016, www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYc-hd1QSwA. 2. 1 Kiely, Eugene, and Lori Robertson. 5 “How to Spot Fake News.” FactCheck.org, 19 Dec. 2016,
In his essay, “The Good, The Bad, and The Daily Show,” Jason Zinser explores the vices and virtues of so-called “fake” news programs. “Fake” news, as Zinser explains, are those programs that blend newsworthy events with comedy. By examining The Daily Show, Zinser reveals both positive and negative impacts that “fake” news could have on society. As a result, Zinser concludes that there are benefits as well as potential problems with “fake” news programs but insists that the true challenge is determining the net impact on society. The essay, which first appeared in The Daily Show and Philosophy: Moments of Zen and the Art of Fake News in 2007, challenges experts on both sides of the argument who either claim fake news is for entertainment only or that fake news is an acceptable source for information on current events. On one hand, Zinser uses expert testimonies to support his argument that the end result is a better informed public but on the other, he makes logical arguments enhanced by examples to illustrate the potential impacts “fake” news can have on its viewers and mainstream media.
Although this brings attention to whatever happened it's resulting in people becoming less educated because of their point of view. If one side of the argument is being supported more than another the people that are less educated around this subject are just going to follow. People become more selective to what they hear or see that they don't refer to the other side of the argument because their so strongly opinionated about what they think. Today fake news is mostly in elections, something gets sent out that the citizens want to hear and brings them more followers. Although its an easy way to get attention it's makes it seem like nothing is wrong or nothing bad is going to happen. People get so caught up about what they hear that it can result in someone getting elected that is bad, which people don't know because they were covering it up. The use for fake news in present day has more negative effects than positive and is still shown in 1984 that it's not beneficial to the society, so the occurrence of it now should stop because its starting to become a concern to our
Social media is a revolutionary way to connect with friends and family through a single app, much like Facebook. Also allowing the public to be more informed on current events, whether that is an issue in today’s society, all the way to a heartwarming story or a funny video. This sounds amazing and the fact that this type of news outlet is practically new. An issue arises that involves “fake news” and with that comes many opinions on what to do about it. I believe that people browsing these platforms should have a little bit of skepticism behind each story and if the topic truly intrigues someone then they should look into the topic on a reliable resource before passing on the authors misinformation.
He claims that “fact checking must be done as a public good,” though it continues to remain futile to post-truthers and alt-posters: an audience who only readily consume information that reinforces their predetermined thoughts and opinions. The author emphasizes the importance of fact checking and its relevance and purposefulness to be shared and documented. As well, Bergel (2017) references a quote by Moynihan to set up his next argument: “everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts,” and counters that alt-posters believe they are entitled to their own facts. The author explains the theatrics of fake news as weaponized and overused by pervasive politics. Bergel (2017) concludes with a call to action: “we must get more creative with information technology and online delivery systems” to develop and facilitate an accessible process to seek true
It's unfortunate how society can not rely on media sources to give the truth about current events happening today. Most people watch or read to find out what is going on in the world, but do not necessarily get the truth, due to some channels either not knowing the whole story or base it off what is being heard and publishing it. Most of the articles/news sources actually say or print false allegations just because the news wants to sell or have viewers watch what some are saying even if it is false information. If people pay attention closely sometimes the truth can be found in it, because some may say the same information. People who watch or read about what goes on everyday in the world tend to believe what is being said since the people
Naturally, journalism would spill over to the Internet and as social media websites such as Twitter and Facebook grew in popularity, so did regular citizens involvement with sharing news. The argument can be made that the explosion of social media journalism was due to frustration from the lack of coverage of news that mattered to society. For example, the lack of subjective coverage of Michael Brown 's death helped with the creation of #BlackLivesMatter and spread of news related to African-American’s and other minorities across the country. After all, journalism is supposed to be a public forum. Millions of people on Twitter share their thoughts and opinions on several topics, furthering the conversation and to some degree challenging society. Things such as “Moments” on Twitter provide us with direct links and summaries to the world’s most important stories and encourage a conversation. According to journalism.org, 63% of users on Twitter and Facebook get their news from these websites. Even more eye opening is that 59% of users on Twitter keep up to date with news stories via Twitter while they are in the process of happening.[3] The rise of social media related journalism has caused some issues however. “Inevitably, as citizen involvement grows, more of our media culture is concerned with talking about news, instead of focusing on original reporting and the vetting of it.”[4] Because the general public has the ability to post as they wish and pass it off as news, it has affected the accuracy of many reports. Many stories lack reputable sources but are shared between millions as an accurate and true story. There are several websites designed to spread inaccurate information. The website www.fakenewswatch.com exists to inform people of these sites in order to avoid mishaps. Recently a Connecticut mom went viral for being involved in an online hoax
There are countless innovative ways to share and communicate any type of news that has become abundant in most places in today’s world. However, this can sometimes bring a negative impact on our society and different aspects of everyday life. It becomes more easier to share news online and with a broad audience. This leads down to a spiraling epidemic known by a world as fake news. Fake news has been plaguing the news feed for centuries, and it continues to be abundant in news in the present, whether it would be in social platforms and online networks, to political speeches, to foreign countries that are publicizing countless amounts of hoaxes and fake news all over the internet.
This is because, whereas most people delve directly into such information before verifying its credibility, the devil often lies in the details at the source as most will use unheard of reporters, quote partial information or unknown resources and often site unknown websites. Therefore, by first verifying the source of the information critically, I would be able to form a reasonable judgment as to whether the news is valid or is a hoax, and thereafter advise the person accordingly (Hunt 4). Finally, I would ask the person to check the dates when the information in question was posted. Due to their unstructured systems which lack editors, numerous fake news articles often post their news with minor errors such as numerous wrong spellings, diction and the wrong dates, all pointing towards their lack of credibility. Therefore, a thorough look at this would enable me to know to verify the credibility of the
Fake news is a kind of yellow news coverage that comprises of deliberately portrayed falsehood or deception spread by the means of the conventional print, broadcasting news media, or through Internet-based online networking. Fake news is composed and distributed with the expectation to delude, keeping in mind the end goal to pick up fiscally or politically misrepresented, or patently false headlines that are good enough to gain consideration and grab attention. Fake news uses striking headlines. Sometimes, even an entire story is made up that counts as a fabricated news story with a specific ultimate goal to expand readership and, on account of web based stories, web based sharing and Internet click income. There are certain kinds of “Fake
The introduction of the internet to modern society has brought about a new age of information relation. Since there is no longer a need to wait until the next print day, news from all over the world is available at a person’s fingertips within hours or even minutes of the event. With this advent of such easily accessible information, new problems for the news media have also arisen. Aside from potentially losing good economic standing because newspapers are no longer being purchased in the quantities they used to be, the credibility of the information itself is also put into question. No one would argue that credibility of news sources is unimportant, but there is a discrepancy in what takes precedence; economy and speed or getting the information out correctly at the first publishing by taking the time to make sure all facts are checked. The importance of having a system of checks on all information submitted is paramount. People trust what they read and believe it to be so without always questioning. If all information were to not be checked thoroughly, there would be instances where people read an article only for information included to be wrong and they go on believing such information. This can be very dangerous as misinformed people make misinformed decisions. With an increase in errors being made by citizen bloggers and even major publications, many are worried that journalistic ethics and credibility in the news media are being sacrificed in order to maintain swiftness in the news circuit and to retain personal profits. Though getting information to the masses quickly is a major part of the media’s importance, this should not mean that the credibility of that information being presented should be sacrificed for it...
Fake News is constantly being written, permeating through television broadcasts, internet sites, and magazine articles. It seems that the amount of false news in the world is starting to overtake the amount of genuine information. This is indeed a problem, but not as much as people make it out to be. This is for a few reasons. Fake news is much like bacteria, there are both beneficial and harmful types of fake news. Beneficial fake news is usually
The new modern world has become a place of opportunities for people to use the world-wide web for publishing their very own writing online without legitimate proof. The internet has entertained a much larger audience than any newscast or newspaper. In fact, the internet has allowed bogus sites to create content that misinforms and fools people into believing in fake news. Newscasts have constantly tried to reconnect with their spectators with conspiracy topics or even false acquisitions to bring back their spotlight. More than ever, consumers of social media sites like Facebook, Twitter or Instagram have spread fake news like wildfire with just one click of a button.
Tristen Samson 4W Mrs. Slous 13 March 2017 “Fake News” Research Paper This year has been a very large example of “fake news” in the United States. “Fake News” is a big example of 2016 because of the United States most recent presidential election.
Some argue that fake news doesn’t matter, and that readers should simply not watch or read any news. Unfortunately, the public cannot just ignore something as prominent as the news, as they are the force protecting the people, or they should be. Many people do not even get fooled from watching news and instead form wrong conclusions from others telling it. Social media makes this practice more common than ever before, and without educating oneself first by watching different news sources, it is impossible to piece together who to trust for oneself. When the President tweets something like “The FAKE NEWS media (failing @nytimes, @NBCNews, @ABC, @CBS, @CNN) is not my enemy, it is the enemy of the American People!”
...stence depends upon continued success in furnishing readers and listeners with a wide range of facts,” said reporter Julian Adams. By the public depending on media for information, they are making the media money. Buying newspapers and magazines are compensating those companies. Listening to your local radio station and watching your local news channel is compensating those companies. “Staging (fabrication) or deliberate distortion of news is against public interest,” said writer William B. Ray. Society believes in media and the media believes in the society. So let the society know the real data and what’s important. Knowing what’s important captures the public’s interest rather than knowing what’s fake. Falsifying News is legal meaning the media is allowed to lie to the public. Everyone has their own views on this topic but either way lying to the society is wrong.