Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of social entrepreneurship on society
Role of entrepreneurship in the society
Social entrepreneurship essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of social entrepreneurship on society
INTRODUCTION
Social businesses are companies created to serve the main purpose of solving the social problems which is however financially self-sustainable. In many countries, social businesses have become an integral tool for both economic and social development. A myriad of instigating cases of social business that have a positive impact on addressing the societal ills have been documented in many literatures (Jiao, 2011). Entrepreneurship has been widely acknowledged for generating and increasing the growth and economic wealth to societies. Social entrepreneurship can be said to play identical roles in the creation of social wealth in times and situations where there are great needs for both the social and ecological solutions (Light, 2010).
…show more content…
For example a variety of conceptual perspectives that apply to different domains such as public management non-profits, philanthropy and social issue management has also been applied to social entrepreneurship. According to Boschee and McClurg (2003), social entrepreneurship shares some similarities with non-profit organizations that are pointed towards providing a more efficient means to deliver their social …show more content…
Like many business missions, as social mission states the aim and objectives of the organizations. However the difference between a social mission and a business mission is the fact that the social mission is embedded for social purposes.
Social entrepreneurs tend to have a clear picture of their social mission, usually through the discernment of the social needs and how to improve the depressing status of the social needs (Dees and Muller, 2008). Social entrepreneurs transcends charitable giving’s and philanthropy to achieve their social mission and usually they focus on the challenges causing the social problems rather than just identifying and alleviating the symptoms (Nga and Shamuganathan, 2010).
The growing global awareness of the concept of social entrepreneurship can be attributed to the four factors that were highlighted by Zahra et al (2008). These factors include; corporate social responsibility movement, technological advances and shared responsibility, market, institutional and state failure and global wealth
Social responsibility can be defined as “the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large” (Mallen Baker, 2004). In addition, social responsibility has been defined differently by various corporate leaders that provide guidelines which impacts how one manages the core business. Social responsibility is an essential part of a business. If managed correctly should strengthen the competitive spirit of the company and provide prosperity to society.
Community-based organizations that are funded by governments in partnerships deliver these social services all over the country. While social needs are rising, the money coming into the nonprofits are not increasing. Therefore, it is important to find innovative ways to cut down the social needs or demand or increase the donor support to help the economically disadvantaged individuals in our community. Changing the way business is done at ImprovedLives will help effectively delivery of the services that will cut down the social needs of our clients and make the organization a model nonprofit for other social services organizations. However, there are certain risks associated with coming up with innovative goals as innovation in its nature is experimental. Consequently, mismanaging these risks can easily lead to breaching the ethical code for nonprofits (NOHS, 2015) and legal regulations relating to tax and misappropriation of
In the present market economy, social innovation should not replace Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) but should enhance it. Some scholars have shown that whereas innovation has been an integral part of a company’s survival it was not part of CSR (Carroll and Shabana, 2010). In the past, CSR was applied in areas of citizenship duties and operation licences; however, this is not sufficient in the modern complex business environment (Googins, 2013).
There are slow adoption rates for internal corporate social networks for many reasons. Although management and organization plays a role, the technology factor is the main reasons why employees are refusing to use these internal networks. With the rate at which technology is becoming more and more advanced, social networking systems are constantly updating their software and user interface (Laudon & Laudon, 2013). This mean that employees who are used to traditional forms of networking such as email, have to take the time to learn new systems and keep up with more social networking than they would like. In the eyes of the employee, using traditional forms of networking is simply more efficient. In order to make these internal social networking programs work, companies need to make more user friendly and easily manageable sites (Altman, 2015). Management also plays a part in the slow adoption rates. Managers need to provide more incentive for employees to use these networks aside from basic social interaction. For example, instead of sending memo’s via email, or other traditional forms of communication, slowly veer employees to seek memos on the company’s social networking site. Making strides like this will give employees more incentive to at least use the sites more often and participate in discussions and posts related to the business. This will allow employees to explore the sites and discover other useful features that might help improve productivity within the office. Organization of the sites could also be greatly approved. Many companies try to mimic other popular social networking sites, this however, may not be a viable solution. Instead, IT personnel should format th...
Government support for social economy entities is recognized in European Union, Brazil and Argentina. While in countries of Africa and Asia support is built by the citizens forums and networks on sustainable development and by United Nations agencies. Among policy themes on social enterprises are: improving access to financial resources; research for increasing understanding and visibility; capacity building; ac¬cess to public procurement.
Drawing on your knowledge of social innovation and organizational form, compare and contrast two organizational forms (e.g association and social movement; company limited by guarantee and coop; hybrid and some ‘pure’ form. Critically evaluate them with regard to their enabling or constraining impact on social innovation. Draw liberally on the relevant literature and illustrate with examples.
Entrepreneurship for social change: Is the U.S. doing enough to encourage and support sustainable social innovation?
Another figure in the social business movement is MD. Tarifur Rahman Khan. He states that many countries suffer from various social problems and that a social business model is more effective for solving various social problems. The social business model mainly works for solving existing problems of the society under the business structure (Khan, 2014).
These endeavors are controlled by shareholders either givers or poor people, and givers recover their underlying speculation, however any extra benefits made by the undertaking are furrowed once again into the work. To show his concept of a social business, Muhammad Yunus weaves through the book the intriguing contextual analysis of Grameen Danone, a joint endeavor amongst Grameen and the French multinational sustenance item organization Danone. Muhammad Yunus sees numerous sources from which these new social organizations can start: existing organizations, establishments, the World Bank and different offices, government improvement reserves, fruitful business people searching for a next movement, well off retirees, and late school graduates. In fact, these sources hold guarantee. Muhammad Yunus likewise trusts that social organizations would urge more individuals to give back: Many would discover building up and working in a social business more appealing than working for a philanthropy, given the renowned society agrees business people well beyond their money related achievement. Muhammad Yunus addresses the handy obstacles of making social organizations by compactly depicting the strides that must be taken if social organizations are to end up standard foundations. Advocates must build up an arrangement of lawful meanings of social business, alongside tax assessment and administrative principles. Social business benchmarks should then be set up and ensured. Muhammad Yunus trusts that distinctive sorts of autonomous accreditation and appraisals organizations will spring up to meet the requests of potential financial specialists and shoppers. I would include that legislature, guaranteeing offices, and the sheets of
The problem that was investigated consisted of a question that Milton Friedman posed in one of his articles, which was featured in The New York Times Magazine in 1970. The question was, “What does it mean to say that “business” has responsibilities” (Friedman, 2007, p. 173)? Friedman (1970) elaborated on how businesses cannot have assigned responsibilities. Furthermore, he described how groups or individuals should be the only ones that can hold responsibilities, not businesses. He stated that associating responsibilities with the word business is too ambiguous. I will examine three discussion questions and three compare and contrast questions which Jennings (2009) posed in a case study that is related to Friedman’s (1970) article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”.
Reed, B. (2011). The Business of Social Responsibility. Retrieved from Dollars and Sense Real World Economics: http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/1998/0598reed.html
It can be concluded that entrepreneurship cannot exist in the absence of innovation. Innovative entrepreneurship is the key to a successful business leading to economic development. Entrepreneurs are very prominent figures of society and therefore their actions and decisions have a significant impact on the welfare of stakeholder groups. Sustainability plays a vital role in this relationship in that it provides a solid foundation upon which a business can expand with more temerity and assuredness.
Social enterprises are put in line of directly helping people. Social entrepreneurs see a problem in society, and they aim to fix that problem through the businesses they create. Often, social entrepreneurs seem to be so in line with their ideas, they commit and put their lives to solving the problems which people face. They are visionaries, but also realists, and are ultimately concerned with the practical implementation of their vision above all else.
Corporate Entrepreneurship can be seen as the process whereby an individual or a group creates a new venture within an existing organization, revitalizes and renews an organization ,or innovates. Zahra’s(1986) definition of corporate entrepreneurship suggests a formal or informal activity aimed at creating new businesses in established firms through product and process innovations and market developments,whereas sathe(1985) defines corporate entrepreneurship as a process of organizational renewal. Corporate Entrepreneurship has emerged as a much needed ingredient contributing towards the growth of any organization under a changing business environment.
Social entrepreneurs drive social innovation and transformation in various fields including education, health, environment and enterprise development. They pursue poverty alleviation goals with entrepreneurial zeal, business methods and the courage to innovate and overcome traditional practices. A social entrepreneur, similar to a business entrepreneur, builds strong and sustainable organizations, which are either set up as not-for-profits or companies.