Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Labelling theory and its effects
Labelling theory and its effects
Labelling theory and its effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Labelling theory and its effects
Deviance is the recognized violations of cultural norms. Deviance can occur from something minor to something major. For instance, a traffic violation could be as a murder or an accident to the death. In terms of deviance, symbolic interactionism is the way that interpersonal relationships and everyday interactions shape definitions of deviance, according to Ferries and Stein. Additionally, for sociologist, all human are deviance as people violate the rules all the time. Erving Goffman used a term 'Stigma' to define the social interactionist as an attribute, behavior or reputation which is socially detachment in a particular way on deviance. This perspective expanded to the three types of theories: the differential association, control theory, …show more content…
Eventually, he get use to smoke from time to time. On the other hand, control theory is refer to people who restrain from a deviant behavior. For Walter Reckless, humans have two control systems to against their desire to deviate social norms. The two control is inner and outer control. An inner control is internalized thought process as a sense of morality, conscience, or religious beliefs. For example, As People will not like to get punishment, they seem to prevent to create something bad deeds. An outer control is groups that encourage us not to deviate. The groups can be members of family, teacher, friends, and more. On theory of Travis Hirschi, he identify four elements of attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief that tend to more effective inner controls. For labeling theory, Howard Becker advocated the labels are given by people to affect their own or others' perception to them. There is a none of things has labels until people name or label them. Edwin Lemert expanded the labeling theory into two types of deviances: primary deviance and secondary deviance. The Primary deviance is the act that provokes a little reaction without intended to against the social
Control theory states that all people are potential deviants and that social bonds determine the outcome. If the family has strong social bond, such as the Simpson’s, though they have problems they are able to overcome them remain a loving family. The strong bonded family keeps their bonds strong by a healthy mix of parenting, discipline, and time spent together. On the contrary the family that has weak social bonds, the submissive parent and son, often have deviant children who defy them. These weak social bonds accumulate through lack of parenting and not a lot of social interaction with each
Therefore, relating back to Mertons definition of an innovator creating their own means to obtain societal goals Another theory that relates closely to the Ottawa valley teens is social control. This theory focuses on the fact that individuals will become delinquent unless they are controlled. There are two types of control theories that relate closely to this article, which are containment and social bond. According to this theory, there are four causes of offending behaviour. What is social environment, meaning education or status in society?
Societies are founded on various social norms. Norms can best be defined as a set of acceptable attitudes and practices by a given society. These norms however are found to vary from one society or cultural setting o the other. Deviance on the other hand is simply when one does something that goes against the set societal norms. Deviance is gauged on a scale of attitudes and behavior contradicting to acceptable social standards (Samuels, 2012).
Labeling theory of deviance suggests that when one is labeled constantly on the basis of any minority it gives rise to deviant behavior in order to prove the strength of the minority. The minority has been labeled so by people for a long time. They have been labeled because of their race. The gang is labeled anti-social because of their criminal behavior which turns them further to deviance. The use of the labeling theory can be seen being implemented very judiciously
Deviance is defined as actions or behaviors that violate socials norms. In turn the concept of deviance is dependent on the social observation and perception. “By it’s very nature, the constructionism through which people define and interpret actions or appearances is always “social.” ”(Henry, 2009 , p. 6) One’s perception of a situation may be completely different from another depending on cultural and social factors. The way someone talks, walks, dresses, and holds themselves are all factors that attribute to how someone perceives another. In some cases what is socially or normally acceptable to one person is deviant in another’s eyes. For this reason there is a lot of gray area involving the topic of deviance because actions and behaviors are so diversely interpreted.
In sociology, the term deviance refers to all violations of social rules, regardless of their seriousness (Essentials of Sociology 136). Deviance is an individual or organizational behavior that violates societal norms and is usually accompanied by negative reactions from others. According to a sociologist S. Becker, he stated that it is not the act itself that makes an action deviant, but rather how society reacts to it.
Deviance is amongst other things a consequence of the response of others to a persons act. Students of deviance can not assume that they are dealing with a homogenous category. When they study people who have been labelled deviant (Howard Becker)
Gina Yu American sociologist, Travis Hirschi, developed his own interpretation of the social control theory in regards to what makes people commit crimes. Hirschi’s social control theory argued that people who held strong holds or bonds to conventional society were less likely to commit crimes or display deviant behavior and vice versa. The key to his theory was the social bond and the four elements that it was composed of. These four elements were attachment, belief, commitment, and involvement. Hirschi especially emphasized the importance of attachment when it came to why he believed social bonds were the key to why people grew up and deviated.
Social Control Theory presumes that people will naturally commit crime if there were left to their own devices (i.e. no laws in society) and people do not commit crimes because of certain controlling forces, such as social bonds that hold individuals back partaking on their anti social behavior (Bell, 2011). Examples of controlling forces are family, school, peers, and the law. Young people who are t... ... middle of paper ... ... nd delinquent are more likely to partake in committing criminal behavior (Shaefer and Haaland, 2011, p.155-156).
The theoretical study of societal reaction to deviance has been carried out under different names, such as, labelling theory, interactionist perspective, and the social constructionist perspective. In the sociology of deviance, the labelling theory of deviant behaviour is often used interchangeably with the societal reaction theory of deviancy. As a matter of fact, both phrases point equally to the fact that sociological explanations of deviance function as a product of social control rather than a product of psychology or genetic inheritance. Some sociologists would explain deviance by accepting without question definitions of deviance and concerning themselves with primary aetiology. However, labelling theorists stress the point of seeing deviance from the viewpoint of the deviant individual. They claim that when a person becomes known as a deviant, and is ascribed deviant behaviour patterns, it is as much, if not more, to do with the way they have been stigmatized, then the deviant act they are said to have committed. In addition, Howard S. Becker (1963), one of the earlier interaction theorists, claimed that, "social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitute deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders". Furthermore, the labelling theoretical approach to deviance concentrates on the social reaction to deviance committed by individuals, as well as, the interaction processes leading up to the labelling.
One of the main perspectives of symbolic interactionism, is the labelling theory by Becker which discusses how individual's behaviour is formed by how others perceive them. Labelling theory is the social reactions, which identifies and interprets activities or individuals as deviant, not only the person who violates the norms. The youth then acts upon how they are perceived, (Bernburg, Krohn & Rivera 2006) which makes them more likely to commit crimes (Sherman & Berk 1984). The outsiders (1963) a book written by Howard Becker a sociologist mentions that social groups create deviance by creating the different rules and norms, and then applying those rules to a particular group of people and labelling them as outsiders. For instance, economic inequality plays a huge role as it is a disadvantage to low-socioeconomic youth which leads them to be deviant against social norms, as they are excluded from society (Baron 2006).
Labelling theory outlines the sociological approach towards labelling within societies and in the development of crime and deviance (Gunnar Bernburg, and D. Krohn et al., 2014, pp. 69-71). The theory purposes that, when an individual is given a negative label (that is deviant), then the individual pursues their new (deviant) label / identity and acts in a manner that is expected from him/her with his/ her new label (Asencio and Burke, 2011, pp. 163-182).
It is noticed that rational choice theory is a neo-classical economic plan that gives a hypothetical clarification for how people make choices when confronted with decisions. Moreover, this theory contends that an individual decides how an individual will act by adjusting the expenses and advantages of their choices. Due to its elegant clarification, the RCT has been broadly connected to the investigation of individual, social, and monetary practices in numerous settings. Knapp and Ferrante (2012) stated that adopted a rational choice viewpoint in his financial way to deal with wrongdoing and contended that a criminal augments their expected benefit from an illegal movement in excess of the anticipated expense of discipline.
Symbolic Interactionist perspective on crime and deviance is when people are not deviant by nature but they are seen as deviant by others causing them to become deviant. It is not the act that is deviant but society’s reaction to the act. People create meaning based on their interaction with others. If we thing about crime and deviance we learn what is acceptable behaviour and what is deviant behaviour through our interactions with others. Deviant behaviour is learned behaviour.
Deviance is the sociological concept of behavior which violates the standards of conduct or expectations of a group or society. Functionalists explain deviance as a common part of human existence, interactionist look at everyday behavior to explain deviance, and conflict theorists argue that people with power define deviance.