Comparing The Labelling Theory And Symbolic Interaction Theory

1622 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Tenets of symbolic interaction theory

Functionalism and symbolic interaction theories understand deviance in society differently. Deviance refers to groups of individuals diverging from usual expectations and standards of society (Clinard 1962). The functionalist theory understands society on a macro-level perceptive, allowing it to see deviance from a holistic viewpoint with the effects it has on society, creating a system working together to maintain sustainability, and to prevent social conflict. On the other hand, symbolic interaction displays how the view of society may be the cause of social conflict. An example of this can be seen from the labelling theory. For the purpose of this essay, exclusion of youth in society will be focused on as a case study to demonstrate the …show more content…

One of the main perspectives of symbolic interactionism, is the labelling theory by Becker which discusses how individual's behaviour is formed by how others perceive them. Labelling theory is the social reactions, which identifies and interprets activities or individuals as deviant, not only the person who violates the norms. The youth then acts upon how they are perceived, (Bernburg, Krohn & Rivera 2006) which makes them more likely to commit crimes (Sherman & Berk 1984). The outsiders (1963) a book written by Howard Becker a sociologist mentions that social groups create deviance by creating the different rules and norms, and then applying those rules to a particular group of people and labelling them as outsiders. For instance, economic inequality plays a huge role as it is a disadvantage to low-socioeconomic youth which leads them to be deviant against social norms, as they are excluded from society (Baron 2006). An example being, youth from a low socioeconomic background are seen as all lazy with no goals or aspirations and try to find the easy way out. Though it's the situation they are put in and the way society perceives that particular group, which forces them to act deviant, to fill that gap in society. Some deviant labels are really strong, which makes It really hard for society to change a view on a social group (Crossman 2018). The rejection by others in society, might leave no choice for the individual, but to form into groups with others, that have similar deviant status, especially for the falsely accused. Edwin Sutherland (1939) developed the differential association theory, which refers to individuals being around and interacting with deviance, individuals tend to learn the attitudes, techniques, and motives for criminal behaviour (Hoffmann 2003). An example would be an adolescent having to be deviant to gain reputation as the 'tough' one, to prove themselves to others to

Show More
Related

  • Labeling Theory and Its Effectiveness on Youth Crime and Anti-Social Behavior

    908 Words  | 2 Pages

    "...social groups create deviance by making rules whose infraction creates deviance, and by applying those roles to particular people and labelling them as outsiders. From this point of view, deviance is not a quality of the act the person commits, but rather a consequence of the application by other of rules and sanctions to an 'offender.' The deviant is one to whom that label has been successfully applied; deviant behaviour is behaviour that people so label." Becker (1963)

    Read More

  • The Sociological General Labeling Theory In Criminal Justice

    1329 Words  | 3 Pages

    Labeling theory in criminal justice, tries to describe the connection between being labeled as a deviant and becoming the very thing the stereotypes suggest “deviant”. Labeling theorist argue that deviant behaviors can be a result of the way one view themselves in society (Bernburg, J. G., & Krohn, M. D., 2003). For instance, being label as a social misfit can contribute to individual believing that he/she must engage in misfit behaviors. Arguing that stereotypes can changes self-perception.

    Read More

  • Jonestown Sociology

    1466 Words  | 3 Pages

    Social deviance is when people who are faced with social norms either choose to conform or to rebel

    Read More

  • Symbolic Interactionism

    1035 Words  | 3 Pages

    Symbolic interactionist make the major point. Because different groups have different norms, what is deviant to to some is not deviant to others. Structural functionalist could not be the correct answer because the functional perspective on deviance is that deviance also has functions. In contrast to this common assumption, the classic functionalist theorist Emile Durkheim (1893/1933, 1895/1964) came to a surprising conclusion. Deviance, he said—including crime—is functional for society. Deviance contributes to the social order in these three ways:

    Read More

  • The Conflict Theory Of Deviance In American History X

    1043 Words  | 3 Pages

    Labeling theory of deviance suggests that when one is labeled constantly on the basis of any minority it gives rise to deviant behavior in order to prove the strength of the minority. The minority has been labeled so by people for a long time. They have been labeled because of their race. The gang is labeled anti-social because of their criminal behavior which turns them further to deviance. The use of the labeling theory can be seen being implemented very judiciously

    Read More

  • Gang Case Study

    1010 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to Becker, the labelling theory of deviance looks at what happens to individuals after they are labelled as deviant (Skatvedt & Schou, 2008) The symbolic interactionist approach focuses on the role of social labels and sanctions that pressure individual gang members to continue engaging in deviant acts (Skatvedt & Schou, 2008).The labelling theory suggests that when an individual is labeled as deviant they are more likely to be rejected by families, friends, and societies which ultimately leads to further deviant acts (Becker, 1973). The deviant identity is thus complete when the individual gang member integrates himself into the gang subculture (Becker, 1973). Two high school gangs, the Roughnecks and the Saints, were constantly involved in deviant acts such as drinking, petty theft etc.,; however, high school teachers labelled the Saints as those headed for success and the Roughnecks as those headed for trouble (Chambliss, 1973) After high school, almost all of the Saints went to college and became doctors, lawyers, etc. while only two Roughnecks went to college and others were involved in killings and dropped out of school and so forth (Chambliss, 1973) This case study demonstrates that labels are powerful; they can trigger a greater involvement in deviant acts through social

    Read More

  • Gattaca

    1385 Words  | 3 Pages

    Label theory is based in the idea that behaviors are irregular when the society labels them as irregular. The label theory implies that a person commits a crime in some time of a life, but that person is not seen as deviant, while other people are deviant. Label theory explains how a behavior of a person conflicts with the norms of the society. For example, A black young men, who lives in a neighborhood controlled by gangs may be labeled as a gang member. In consequence, that young man can start to act as gang member or became one. He incorporates the label that was given to him.

    Read More

  • The Labelling Theory

    1674 Words  | 4 Pages

    The labelling theory became dominant within society during the 1940’s and 1950’s, when a group of graduate students from the Chicago school tried a different approach to applying theory to deviant behaviour. Within this group was a highly influential young man, Howard S.Becker who became the person most recognised for his work with the labelling of crime (Williams.F. McShaneM. 2010.p110). Becker argued that labels could be applied through the social reaction of others when a deviant or criminal act had been committed he stated that “Labelling is the process of identifying, categorising and stereotyping social categories such as delinquents” (Davies.M.et.al.2010.p30). When an individual becomes labelled a criminal, people do not consider all the praiseworthy things they may have done previously, they just see that they have committed some form of deviance and are now judged within societ...

    Read More

  • Deviance Theory Analysis

    1580 Words  | 4 Pages

    When an individual breaks the societal rules of conduct, they are said to be involved in deviant behaviors. However, due to the dynamism of the societies, what may be regarded as a deviant act in one society could be regarded as normal within another society. This brings out the issue that deviance may be viewed as relative to both time and location with regard to the differences in societies. Out of this understanding, deviance is viewed as the violation of social norms out of any acts, thoughts, or attitudes that the particular society regards as violation of its values or rules (Long Russ). A deviant conduct is against the definitions of the good and bad conduct as agreed upon by members of a social system. Such behaviors are in a negated direction and bear enough magnitude to surpass the acceptance and accommodation limit of the particular community.

    Read More

  • Labeling Theory

    3342 Words  | 7 Pages

    The theoretical study of societal reaction to deviance has been carried out under different names, such as, labelling theory, interactionist perspective, and the social constructionist perspective. In the sociology of deviance, the labelling theory of deviant behaviour is often used interchangeably with the societal reaction theory of deviancy. As a matter of fact, both phrases point equally to the fact that sociological explanations of deviance function as a product of social control rather than a product of psychology or genetic inheritance. Some sociologists would explain deviance by accepting without question definitions of deviance and concerning themselves with primary aetiology. However, labelling theorists stress the point of seeing deviance from the viewpoint of the deviant individual. They claim that when a person becomes known as a deviant, and is ascribed deviant behaviour patterns, it is as much, if not more, to do with the way they have been stigmatized, then the deviant act they are said to have committed. In addition, Howard S. Becker (1963), one of the earlier interaction theorists, claimed that, "social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitute deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders". Furthermore, the labelling theoretical approach to deviance concentrates on the social reaction to deviance committed by individuals, as well as, the interaction processes leading up to the labelling.

    Read More

  • Feminist Theory Of Poverty

    1369 Words  | 3 Pages

    The approach theorizes that society is constructed of all of the everyday interactions between individuals (Macionis. 2015). Therefore, what an individual constantly learns from others, how they communicate with people, and respond to everything around them, is what makes up society. When studying crime and why it occurs, Symbolic Interaction states that criminal or deviant behavior is typically learned from the people and events around them (Macionis. 2015). It is important to note that this theory is mostly applied to less severe and moderate crimes such as drug use, theft, burglary, etc. rather than extreme violent crimes, such as

    Read More

  • The Implications of Labelling Theory and how It Affects Individuals

    1254 Words  | 3 Pages

    Labelling theory outlines the sociological approach towards labelling within societies and in the development of crime and deviance (Gunnar Bernburg, and D. Krohn et al., 2014, pp. 69-71). The theory purposes that, when an individual is given a negative label (that is deviant), then the individual pursues their new (deviant) label / identity and acts in a manner that is expected from him/her with his/ her new label (Asencio and Burke, 2011, pp. 163-182).

    Read More

  • Functionalist Perspective Of Crime

    1381 Words  | 3 Pages

    Symbolic Interactionist perspective on crime and deviance is when people are not deviant by nature but they are seen as deviant by others causing them to become deviant. It is not the act that is deviant but society’s reaction to the act. People create meaning based on their interaction with others. If we thing about crime and deviance we learn what is acceptable behaviour and what is deviant behaviour through our interactions with others. Deviant behaviour is learned behaviour.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Three Sociological Perspectives

    579 Words  | 2 Pages

    While functionalist and conflict perspectives are represented through societal cohesiveness and societal engagement symbolic interactionism shows the signifigance of it all. Society is symbolic interactionism. It's emphasizes of how society mingles and intertwines within itself through conflict and resloution every moment of everyday. Without interaction we would all be hermits or living in underground bunkers fading away. It would all become nothingness and it's history would be a distant

    Read More

  • Deviance Case Study

    1226 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sociologist Edwin Sutherland first advanced the idea that an individual undergoes the same basic socialization process in learning conforming and deviant acts (Schaefer 2015). Through cultural transmission, criminal or deviant behavior is learned by interacting with others. This learned behavior also includes motives and rationale for explaining the deviant acts. Sutherland used the term differential association to describe the process through which an individual develops an attitude of favorability to deviant acts that leads to violations of rules, through interactions with social groups. These acts can also include noncriminal deviant acts, such as

    Read More

More about Comparing The Labelling Theory And Symbolic Interaction Theory

Open Document