Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social factors in juvenile delinquency
Social affect on juvenile delinquency
The social construct of juvenile delinquency
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social factors in juvenile delinquency
Thesis: The main idea and focus of my research is to determine whether or not a child’s social, environmental, and parental factors influence their behavior using the social control/social bonds theory. Chui W, Chan H. (2012). An empirical investigation of social bonds and juvenile delinquency in hong kong. Child & Youth Care Forum, 41, 371-386 “This study aims to test all Hirschi’s social bond elements with a sample of secondary educated male and female Hong Kong adolescents” (Chui, & Chan, 2012, pg. 371). The students were given questionnaires and remained confidential. The questionnaire was to study students’ social bonds and the student’s delinquency. The adolescence period is the most important of a child’s life when it comes to building their personality and being on the right path. There are many factors that can prevent, or put a juvenile at a higher risk of …show more content…
(2010). Delinquency, social skills and the structure of peer relations: assessing criminological theories by social network theory. Social Forces, 89, 609-631 Smångs states that juvenile delinquency is a group phenomenon, he says that “friends of juvenile delinquents are delinquent to a much greater extent than friends of non-delinquents” (Smångs, 2010, pg. 609). Juveniles are influenced, or transformed, by their relationships with their peers. Juveniles want to fit in and feel accepted, it is common for juveniles to act differently to try to impress their peers or fit in. The study actually compares two different rival theories; this is to help collect a more accurate series of results. Smångs results supported his hypothesis that the stronger tie between two delinquents, the more contacts they have in common. This shows that in most friend groups, the juveniles all have strong similarities. This could either support the theory that juveniles act a different way to fit in, or that due to a lack of normal social skills, the delinquents are only capable of befriending each
According to Price & Kunz, (2003) family structure is a major factor in explaining delinquency. The research aimed at finding a link between cohabiting and other family types with delinquency (Price & Kunz, 2003). They made an important finding that adolescents from cohabiting families are at greater odds of engaging in non-violent delinquency compared to those from biological-parent families. The findings contradict the findings of other studies that show that that youth from broken families are likely to engage themselves in delinquent activities. For example, in one longitudinal study by Juby and Farrington, (2003) they found out that children especially boys who were from non-intact families portrayed negative behaviors compared to those that were from intact families (Juby & Farrington, 2001). Moreover, Prince & Kunz, (2003) performed a meta-analysis involving divorce and juvenile delinquency. They also made a finding that children from divorced homes have a high rate of delinquency compared to those from intact homes.
...will be seen right away, for example the link between socioeconomic status, as well as between housing and delinquent behavior. The advantage of using this study design is that it can show protective factors that might deter delinquent behavior. If a student has a greater commitment to school they are less likely to have incidents with criminal behavior, or show less of a desire to associate with peers who commit specific criminal behavior. As a result of using the analysis, risk and protective factors could serve as basis for research in the future. In addition, interventions based on imparting strategies for coping could be developed. There is still much work to be done to fully explain why youths commit crimes, but this study will help gain insight and understanding of the ways that specific factors influence various types of violent and nonviolent delinquency.
The study of Juvenile delinquency and the theories pertaining to it are vital for several reasons. In order to more effectively engage with youths and foster positive behavior and schemas, the individuals must first be understood. The study of theory provides a means of understanding adolescents and the factors that lead to or detract from delinquent behavior. In the case of juvenile delinquent, Jordan Brown, theory helps to provide insight into why an eleven-year-old boy murdered his stepmother.
Laub, John H., and Robert J. Sampson 2003. Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Criminals are not born; they are created or molded into individuals who participate in criminal behaviors. There are several factors that influence deviance beginning with social structures, generational values and attitudes and social bonding. The concepts of all five theories briefly clarify why criminals partake in deviant activities; however, I believe three learning theories - Social Disorganization, Differential Association and Hirschi’s Social Bonding - best explain how social structures and interactions correlate with the cultivation of criminals.
A problem many communities are faced with is delinquency and gangs. Delinquency and gangs begin to pull in the similarities and focus more on the meaning connected to youth violence from the past to the present. Based on this context, individuals have an understanding the different ways delinquent juveniles are affected by certain policies. Delinquent youth come in many different age groups, sex, ethic group, and race, while society may look at delinquency as starting out as soon as children enter grade school delinquency starts when a child can fully comprehend there wrong doing.
The reason for the lack of sufficient changes in juvenile delinquency is that the problems that leads to juvenile delinquency starts in the home and there has not been enough attention paid to the family dynamics which causes delinquency. Parents are the first relationship chi...
The Social Bond Theory fits well into the life of Willie Bosket. Originated in 1969 by Travis Hirschi, Social Bond Theory argued that through effective socialization, a relationship forms between individuals and a social group. When this bond becomes weak or broken, deviance and a life of crime may result (Schmalleger 107). These bonds include components of communal relationships, including family attachments, individual commitments to social and organized norms, involvement in activities, and the belief that these factors are significant. Since the relationships have been thought to help in decreasing the need to partake in disobedient conduct, a great deal of emphasis is put on the fact that a shortage of these attachments exists among juvenile
generalizable to the population because the social bonds solely emphasized on typical white families. However, the psychodynamic theory managed to address the weaknesses of the social bond theory because it’s generalizable towards the population to a greater extent. For instance, psychodynamic theory interventions were tested on the African population in Nigeria who were adolescents from the lower class as these psychodynamic interventions were easy to conduct among populations in order to draw inferences (Taiwo & Osinowo, 2011, pp. 627-629).
Deviance is the recognized violations of cultural norms. Deviance can occur from something minor to something major. For instance, a traffic violation could be as a murder or an accident to the death. In terms of deviance, symbolic interactionism is the way that interpersonal relationships and everyday interactions shape definitions of deviance, according to Ferries and Stein. Additionally, for sociologist, all human are deviance as people violate the rules all the time.
Thompson, W. E. and Bynum J. E. (2010). Juvenile Delinquency: A sociological Approach Eighth Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Krohn, M., & Massey, J. (1980). Social control and delinquent behavior: an examination of the elements of the social bond. The Socialogical Quarterly, 21(4), 529-544.
The social environment of teens holds an enormous influence on how the teens act and behave. Teens are easily influenced by their surroundings and they look to others for guidance. Their behavior results from that of the parent and peer influences. Parents play a particularly influential role in their child’s life and it is up to them to make sure that they are leading their sons or daughters in the right directions. A teen’s peers also play a large role in how the teen behaves when the parents are not around. A teen’s social environment, consisting of family and peers, plays a vital role in their life, therefore becoming the ultimate cause of juvenile delinquency.
Agnew, R. (1985). Social Control Theory and Delinquency: A Longitudinal Test. Criminology Volume 23 , 47-59.
Juvenile delinquency is one of the major social issues in the United States today. Juvenile delinquency, also known as juvenile offending, is when “a violation of the law committed by a juvenile and not punishable by death or life imprisonment” (Merriam-webster.com). Although we have one justice system in America, the juvenile system differs from the adult juvenile system. Most juvenile delinquents range from as low as the age of seven to the age of seventeen. Once the delinquent or anyone turns the age of eighteen, they are considered an adult. Therefore, they are tried as an adult, in the justice system. There are many different reasons why a child would commit crime, such as mental and physical factors, home conditions, neighborhood environment and school conditions. In addition, there are a variety of effects that juvenile justice systems can either bad effects or good effects. Finally there are many different solutions that can reduce juvenile delinquency. As a result, juvenile delinquency is a major issue and the likeliness of it can be reduced. In order to reduce juvenile delinquency there has to be an understanding of the causes and the effects.