Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crime as social construct
Effects of juvenile delinquency
Effects of juvenile delinquency
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crime as social construct
Chapter six covers the main topic of social interactionist theories of delinquency. Some of the areas covered are labeling theory, symbolic interactionist theory, conflict theory, as well as a few other theories. Prevention of delinquency is also a topic discussed. Labeling theory in the textbook is defined as the view that society creates the delinquent by labeling those who are apprehended as different from other youths when in reality they are different primarily because they have been tagged with a deviant label. The biggest powers within this theory are rule making and social power that can create deviance. The results from this is that the youth then peruse the deviant behavior they have been labeled because they think why change …show more content…
It is defined as a perspective in social psychology that analyzes the process of interaction among human beings at the symbolic level. Shared meanings, behavioral expectations, and understanding how other people see others are all important to the process of this theory, as well as things such as role taking. The concept of interaction is between two or more individuals with each taking a role within the relationship. One of the four elements involved with role taking is how one individual perceives what others think about them and is then connected to the “looking-glass self,” which has its own three elements to it. They are how others actually see another, how we perceive the way others see another person, and how we see our self. An insight into this is if an individual thinks the perception of themselves from others is negative, they will act out more than those who think it is positive because it all has to do with their perceptions. An example of this would be from a class I had in high school where a friend of mine didn’t think a teacher liked them so they decided to not do their best. The negative perception they had influenced the work ethic they showed which resulted in them receiving a bad grade. Symbolic interactionist theory has a lot to do with the conceptions and how they influence the decision making each person does.
Conflict theory is another perspective to explain juvenile delinquency
…show more content…
This discusses that crime arises because people are a member of a subculture that has conduct norms. There are many different types of groups such as family, political, religious, and so on and each has their own norms they follow. In today’s society group and cultural conflicts is a very large issues that has risen due to high media coverage of it. Whether it be from the terrorist attacks to police ambushes to police shootings involving black citizens, they all contribute to the findings in this theory. Each of these situations breaks the conduct norms in the group or culture they are a part of and crime is considered what the misconduct is. Overall, conflict theory shows the norm breaks in society within each of the groups discussed, but also shows the flaws created from the disruptions to
The study of Juvenile delinquency and the theories pertaining to it are vital for several reasons. In order to more effectively engage with youths and foster positive behavior and schemas, the individuals must first be understood. The study of theory provides a means of understanding adolescents and the factors that lead to or detract from delinquent behavior. In the case of juvenile delinquent, Jordan Brown, theory helps to provide insight into why an eleven-year-old boy murdered his stepmother.
By definition, conflict theory basically sees the society as a pitch in which inequality thrives in order to generate conflict and change. For instance, this theory emphasizes on the purpose of coercion in generating a social order that’s often ch...
Attempting to explain what causes a juvenile to become delinquent with pin point accuracy is like trying to nail Jell-O to a tree; it cannot be done. However, there is a plethora of theories that attempt to explain the correlation between delinquent behavior committed by a juvenile and the experiences that brought him/her to that moment. For this reason, narrowing down the vast amounts of explanations can become quite challenging. Consequently, for this observation, the focus will center on the conflict theory, the culture conflict theory, and the cultural transmission theory as an attempt to clarify the connection between the two variables; juveniles and the delinquent behaviors that they exhibit.
The second is related to status and respect. This type of status can change even between subcultures and may result in crime in order to achieve this s...
they are currently in. A juvenile committing crime may the only way they know to display their anger and feelings of neglect.
Some of the explanations of delinquency insinuates that education, politics, social factors, family issues among others are the main causes of delinquency (Rutter, 2013).Just as these were some of the factors in “There Are No Children Here”. In addition, criminal investigators formulated several theories which explain causes of delinquency. Among them are social factors which are explained through several theories which include Social Reaction Theory also referred to as Labeling theory and Power control
The presentation of negative stimuli has been found to be one of the forerunning causes of delinquency amongst juveniles. Some examples of undesirable stimuli that an adolescent could be facing are child abuse, neglect, and exploitation, hostile relationships with parents teachers and peers, negative academic experiences, neighborhood difficulties, and poverty. If a juvenile is surrounded by individuals who sell drugs in order to finance a way of life that is easier and more financial than their current way of life, the adolescent id more likely to imitate that behavior by association.
Theories have often been developed to explain how delinquents violate social norms and still manage to maintain positive self images of themselves. Neutralization theory, developed by Gresham Sykes and David Matza in 1957 set out to do just this. Critics, however, have claims that the theory, on it’s own, is not a sufficient explanation for adolescent’s participation in crime in delinquency. It has also been claimed by critics that neutralization theory is best viewed as a components of larger theory of crime and can be incorporated into other theories such as social bond theory.
Juvenile delinquency is a problem in the United States. According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Index report for 2016, there were a total of 8,421,481 arrests made in the United States. Out of these, 674,820 were under the age of 18 at the time of arrest (FBI: UCR 2016). Why do these youths commit crimes? In this paper, I am going to view juvenile delinquency from a strain and symbolic interaction perspective to see if we can shed any light on the problem.
Crime exists everywhere. It is exists in our country, in the big cities, the small towns, schools, and even in homes. Crime is defined as “any action that is a violation of law”. These violations may be pending, but in order to at least lower the crime rate, an understanding of why the crimes are committed must first be sought. There are many theories that are able to explain crimes, but three very important ones are rational choice theory, social disorganization theory and strain theory.
The main aim of this essay is to describe two general theories of offending and then consider the extent to which they explain youth offending. This essay will firstly outline the context of the labelling theory then go on to discuss the way in which a label becomes a person’s master status in life. The essay will then compare the differences with primary and secondary deviance and define the term self fulfilling prophecy. The second stage of the essay will describe the learning theory, explaining the background including all the terms, classical conditioning, operant conditioning and social learning theory. Furthermore, it will then go on to explore the research and describe the extent to which both theories explain youth offending. Finally, the essay will compare and contrast the two theories and evaluate any of the assets or implications.
Thompson, W. E. and Bynum J. E. (2010). Juvenile Delinquency: A sociological Approach Eighth Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Krohn, M., & Massey, J. (1980). Social control and delinquent behavior: an examination of the elements of the social bond. The Socialogical Quarterly, 21(4), 529-544.
The importance of integrated theory relies on these social institutions to create a theory of the causes criminal behavior in the sense that it links to the family who is bonded to the offender in which he learn most of his behaviors from due to lack of guidance or support of his or her goals while growing up. This is where he attaches himself to peers to seek the sense of feeling important within society; this is where the child feels valued by doing crazy things with his friends who value him, but don’t have his best interest in mind. This type of social control illustrates that the individual takes into account the opinion of others to help guide his or her decision in life, which could be right or wrong therefore, it is important to enhance this individual with positive guidance with support by their
Criminology is the study of crime and criminals; a branch of sociology. More accurately, it is the study of crime as a social trend, and its overall origins, its many manifestations and its impact upon society as a whole. That makes it more a form of sociology than a law enforcement tool. But the trends it studies have a huge impact on the way the police do their jobs, the way society treats its criminals, and the way a given community goes about maintaining law and order. The writer will describe and give examples of the three perspectives of viewing crimes. The perspectives that will be highlighted are the consensus view, the conflict view or the interactionist view. Each perspective maintain its own interpretation of what constitutes criminal activities and what causes people to engage in criminal behaviors (Siegel, p.12).