Gene Roddenberry once said that he had “no belief that Star Trek depicts the actual future, it depicts us, now, things we need to understand about that.” He helmed a show that, in its very first episode, promised to boldly go where no man had gone before... and go there it did. Throughout its run and multiple spinoffs, Star Trek made powerful social commentary in line with its creator’s vision.
The original series ran from 1966 through 1969, in an overlap between the civil rights movement’s height and second wave feminism’s. Bigotry abounded, with workplace inequality a big issue for both groups. Despite the Civil Rights Act’s declaration that employers couldn’t discriminate based on sex, race, color, national origin, or religion, equality
…show more content…
was far away. Enter the crew of the starship Enterprise. Lt. Sulu, an Asian man, and Lt. Uhura, a black woman, both occupy prominent positions on the bridge, and neither play into racial or gender stereotypes. Ensign Chekov, a Russian man, was also a series regular despite US/Soviet Union tensions running high at the time (to say the least). On multiple occasions, Star Trek combated racism via not-so-subtle plotlines. An episode titled “Let That Be Your Last Battlefield” featured two alien races, both of the planet Cheron. One side was pitch black on the left side of their body and bright white on the right, the other, the opposite. Those with white on the left side had been used as slaves and treated as inferior for centuries purely based on skin color, oppression that ultimately resulted in bloodshed. When one being of each race boards the Enterprise, their difference and hatred for each other must be explained to the crew in a way that makes the conflict seem silly and arbitrary. In addition, the foolishness of such discrimination is directly addressed during a conversation between one of the aliens, Chekov, and Sulu. Alien: “You are from the planet Earth. There is no persecution on your planet. How can you understand my fear? My apprehension, my degradation, my suffering?” Chekov: “There was persecution on Earth once. I remember reading about it in my history class...” Sulu: “Yes, but it happened way back in the 20th century. There’s no such primitive thinking today.” There, only nine months after the Fair Housing Act, Star Trek explicitly stated that racism was a result of “primitive thinking.” In one of Star Trek’s more iconic moments, the episode “Plato’s Stepchildren” caused a world of controversy with a simple action. Only a year after interracial marriage was legalized, Captain Kirk, a white man, kissed Lieutenant Uhura, a black woman. In and of itself, the kiss was an incredibly progressive act, and should be seen as such. However, it is important to recognize its shortcomings. Kirk kissed Uhura while being controlled by psychokinetic beings, and was visibly attempting to resist. Fan mail following the episode’s airing complained that Kirk, a notorious womanizer, would not be so reluctant to kiss a beautiful woman in his arms. It was a “two steps forward, one step back” situation, but it was a step forward nonetheless. Unfortunately, the show was not as progressive regarding sexism. While the prominence of Lt. Uhura and other female officers would seem to suggest that women were equal to men on the Enterprise, very little is done to actually show that. While Uhura is a strong female character, she is one of the only ones. Yeoman Rand, a recurring female role, heavily plays into the “dumb blonde” and “damsel in distress” stereotypes. In “The Corbomite Maneuver,” she serves as little more than a glorified maid, there to serve the captain his coffee and makes sure he takes his pills. She remains an object for men to gaze for the rest of her time on the show. Many female characters appear only for one episode, women for Kirk to kiss and promptly forget. This is consistent with the sexist views of the time (as evidenced by 1966’s large wage gap). Ultimately, the female representation was important, but only skin deep. Star Trek: The Next Generation began in 1987, 18 years after the original series ended. It showed the starship Enterprise 78 years after Captain Kirk’s command. The show took on an incredibly broad range of topics, and was far more nuanced and philosophical than the swashbuckling and sexism of the sixties. In “Measure Of A Man,” Next Generation questioned what it means to be a person, and whether that has any real correlation to one’s biology.
The episode shows Commander Data, an android, ordered to submit to disassembly and experimentation. He understandably resists, but because he is a machine, he has no right to refuse the orders. Legally, in fact, he is the property of Starfleet. Captain Picard spearheads an effort to get Data the rights he deserves, ultimately taking the matter to court. He is found to be a sentient lifeform, and is saved from disassembly. Within the episode, Picard mentions that Data being Starfleet’s property is essentially slavery, making it very clear what message the episode is intended to convey. Although Data is biologically different from the organic members of the crew, he is not an entirely different, inferior species. He feels emotions; he learns by experience; he forms both platonic and romantic relationships; he is, in many ways, a person. For centuries the “they aren’t real people” argument has been used against oppressed groups to justify oppression, but what defines a “real person?” What differences could justify withholding fundamental rights, could justify cruelty or hatred? If this episode is to be believed, certainly not superficial things that one cannot change, from skin color to …show more content…
circuitry. Something of a technological big bang was underway during the nineties, with lots of rapid development and little room to breathe. “The Game” served as something of a cautionary tale. When Commander Riker returns from an away mission with a futuristic computer game, it quickly becomes a ship wide sensation, so much so that teenaged Wesley Crusher becomes suspicious. After conducting some tests on the game, he realizes it is psychotropic and highly addictive. All the affected adults are soon under the control of the game developer, with only Crusher and and Data left to retake the ship. They disrupt the game’s control, and free the rest of the crew. The episode depicts seemingly banal technology utilized as a weapon, something that would not have been impossible in the 1990s. With new and improved gadgets being revealed so often, it was important to note that while it is amusing and useful, tech can also be utilized in a darker manner. Too much trust cannot be placed in technology— code is easily corrupted. Star Trek: Deep Space Nine was perhaps the most politically heavy Star Trek series. First airing in 1993, it depicted life on a space station just outside the only known stable wormhole in the galaxy. Captain Sisko, Star Trek’s first black captain, helmed the series, assisted by Major Kira Nerys (effectively the first officer, and the first woman to hold such a position on Star Trek). The Deep Space Nine episode “In The Hands Of The Prophets” tackled the topic of religion in the same year the Religious Freedom Restoration Act was passed, 1993.
The station’s schoolteacher, Mrs. O’Brien, is observed teaching a class by a religious figure of the planet Bajor, Vedek Wynn. When Wynn sees science that contradicts her belief system being taught, she immediately retaliates. Children are pulled out of school when Mrs. O’Brien refuses to alter her curriculum in accordance with the Bajoran faith, and ultimately the school is bombed, an action presumably organized by the vedek. Wynn rallies Bajorans behind her in the name of religion; Mrs. O’Brien is shunned and even threatened. Another vedek, Bareil, travels up to DS9 in an attempt to diffuse the situation. Vedek Wynn manipulates a young Bajoran woman into assassinating Vedek Bareil by telling her that it is her duty to the Prophets (Bajoran gods) to do so. The murder attempt fails; it is revealed Wynn hopes to become the next Kai (the Bajoran equivalent of a pope) and Vedek Bareil was one of her major competitors for that
position. Vedek Wynn, a trusted religious figure, used something that many people poured their lives into, their faith, to further her own personal goals. She is established as a villain for doing so, and that is an important distinction— her manipulation of religion is villainized, not the religion itself. As Sisko remarked in the episode, the Bajorans clung to their faith during a hostile occupation of their planet, and it helped them make it through. Religion is an incredibly powerful unifying force for good, but dangerous interpretations of it can do immense amounts of damage (as evidenced by real world terrorist groups of the time such as Al Qaeda and the KKK). Airing in 1998 (the same year as a certain scandal involving Bill Clinton), one episode showed the almighty Federation to be... less than almighty, to say the least. “Inquisition” saw Dr. Julian Bashir, a Starfleet officer, accused of espionage by Sloan, an officer supposedly from the Federation’s Office of Internal Affairs. Bashir is put through an unorthodox ordeal in an attempt to determine his guilt. When he is found innocent, It’s revealed that Sloan is an agent of Section 31, a group protecting the Federation that reports to no one but itself. In Bashir’s words, they function as “judge, jury, and executioner.” The agency was formed as a part of the Federation over 200 years prior, but was, and has ever since been, top secret. Section 31 uses torture, deception, spying, and other tactics that violate core principles of the Federation in order to neutralize things they consider to be threats. The agency bears a striking resemblance to the real world gestapo. The episode showed that even the Federation, a government that is seemingly near perfect, has a dirty underbelly. Politics is a dirty business, and is nowhere near perfect, and Deep Space Nine was not afraid to acknowledge that. Featuring Captain Kathryn Janeway, Star Trek’s first female captain, Star Trek: Voyager premiered in 1995. The show revolves around the starship Voyager; after being pulled 70,000 light years away from home, the crew have only one goal: return to Earth. With Voyager in an uncharted quadrant full of strange new species, social issues were inevitable. Some of the first aliens Voyager encountered in the Delta Quadrant were the Vidiians, a race being virtually wiped out by a deadly and incurable illness known as the Phage. The disease, to quote the aliens, “consumes our bodies, destroys our genetic codes and cellular structures.” It is resistant to all attempts at medical treatment, creating the need to harvest organs from other species in order to replace their own, disease-riddled ones. Whenever possible, the organs are taken from the dead. In urgent situations, however, living beings became unwilling “donors.” The episode (“Phage”) raised questions about ethics in medicine. Thousands of people have terminal conditions that can be fixed with an organ transplant, but many die waiting for one. Right now, only those who consent to the procedure can give organs, and of those, it is usually the dead who do the giving. But if humanity found itself in the Vidiians’ position, would we take their course of action? Would we be able to justify murder in order to preserve the entire species? The Phage can also be seen as a metaphor for cancer: it is very difficult to treat, claims lives every day, and destroys the body at the cellular level. Despite extensive research, we still cannot completely prevent or cure all of its many manifestations. It could strike anyone on Earth at any time, and those who have it either fight it all their life or or live in fear of its return. The healthcare industry was touched on later in the series as well, most notably in the episode “Critical Care.” Voyager’s holographic doctor is kidnapped and forced to work in a hospital that determines someone’s access to medical care based on how useful they are to society. In the words of the hospital administrator, “an agricultural engineer is obviously more important than a waste processor... when your resources are limited, you have to prioritize.” Those deemed less important are left to suffer in favor of pampering the “worthy,” a system that is shown in a highly negative light throughout the episode. The hospital acts as a cautionary tale and highly exaggerated version of America’s own healthcare system. In the US, access to medicine is largely determined by wealth. The sick and injured will be treated (unlike those in the fictional hospital), but the medical bills must be paid, through insurance or otherwise. This can prevent lower income Americans from seeking necessary treatment in an effort to save money. Voyager advocates fairly clearly for a universal healthcare system in this episode, saying that someone’s wealth (or, in the show’s hospital, usefulness to society) should not determine whether or not they receive medical care. Voyager had one of the most diverse casts of any Star Trek series— only 3 out of 9 of the senior officers were portrayed by white men, of those, only one played a human character. The captain, first officer, head of security, operations officer, and the head of engineering were not among those played by white men. This was a huge leap forward from the original Enterprise crew. The crew of Voyager is actually considerably more diverse than the casts of many TV shows and movies today. This has only skimmed the surface. Through its many iterations, Star Trek took an an incredibly extensive range of issues. It also made the world a better place, not only through its treatment of real world issues, but also through providing a world people could escape into, through bringing joy. As Gene Roddenberry once said, “The human race is a remarkable creature, one with great potential, and I hope that Star Trek has helped to show us what we can be if we believe in ourselves and our abilities.”
A timeline of the 90s features similar white on black hate discrimination as found in The Watsons. In 1991, Rodney King was brutally beaten by white LAPD officers following a car chase. 1993 saw members of the Fourth Reich Skinheads, who attempted to bomb a church in Los Angeles and kill Rodney King, get arrested for their plots (Ross). The year 1993 also featured the release of the very first black American Girl doll; her name was Addy Walker. This first doll was depicted ...
During the 1950‘s suburbs such as Levitown were springing up all across the country, and the so-called American dream was easier to achieve for everyday Americans than ever before. They had just come out of two decades dominated by The Great Depression and World War Two, and finally prosperity was in sight. The need for women to work out of the home that was present during the war was no more, and women were overwhelmingly relegated to female-dominated professions like nursing, secretaries, and teachers, if they worked at all. Televisions became very popular, and quickly became part of the American cultural canon of entertainment. Leave It To Beaver is a classic American television show, encompassing values such as respect, responsibility and learning from your mistakes. But, at least in the episode used for this essay, it is also shockingly sexist to a modern viewer. This begs the question, what does the episode The Blind Date Committee1 say about the gender expectations of the 1950’s?
In “In Living Color: Race and American Culture”, Michael Omi claims that racism still takes place in America’s contemporary society. According to Omi, media and popular culture shape a segregating ideology by giving a stereotypical representation of black people to the public, thus generating discrimination between races (Omi 115:166). In “Bad Feminist: Take One”, Roxane Gay discusses the different roles that feminism plays in our society. She argues that although some feminist authors and groups try to create a specific image of the feminist approach, there is no definition that fully describe feminism and no behaviors that can make someone a good feminist or a bad feminist (Gay 304:306). Both authors argue
The classic network era is one of the most easily recognizable and distinct eras in television history. Both Bewitched and I Love Lucy were huge sitcoms that took up issues of gender representation and patriarchy in their programs through the representations of the main male and female characters of their respective series. While both of these series pushed boundaries when it came to the representation of women, in the end, the costuming of these men and women, how the main characters are introduced, and the domestic environment that the atmosphere takes place in, all serve to reinforce traditional gender norms and reveals that patriarchy is dependent on maintaining dominant ideas about masculinity and femininity.
...better in the 1950’s. [22] Given the historical context in which the book was written, its popular reception, its persuasiveness, and the realities of the history of race relations which it exposes, the book’s significance cannot be denied.
Since its start, the television industry has been criticized for perpetuating myths and stereotypes about African-Americans through characterizations, story lines, and plots. The situation comedy has been the area that has seemed to draw the most criticism, analysis, and disapproval for stereotyping. From Sanford and Son and The Jefferson’s in the 1970s to The Cosby Show (1984) and The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air in the 1990s, sitcoms featuring black casts and characters have always been controversial. However, their significance upon our American culture cannot be disregarded. During the 1950s and 1960s, 97% of the families were Caucasian. In the first five years of the 1990s, nearly 14% of the television families were African-American (Bryant 2001). These statistics obviously show the substantial impact our American culture has had on African-American television families.
"Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the single most important piece of legislation that has helped to shape and define employment law rights in this country (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2001)". Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, age, gender, disability, religion and national origin. However, it was racial discrimination that was the moving force of the law that created a whirlwind of a variety of discriminations to be amended into Title VII. Title VII was a striving section of legislation, an effort which had never been tried which made the passage of the law an extremely uneasy task. This paper will discuss the evolution of Title VII as well as the impact Title VII has had in the workforce.
In 1964, Linda Brown along with the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) challenged the Separate but Equal doctrine, and won (Askew). Discriminatory laws that lasted for 99 years, starting with the Black Codes, moving to the Louisiana Separate Car Act and Plessy v. Ferguson, to everyday laws, finally became overturned. They permanently hindered a large group of people as seen by literacy rates, household income, and household ownership, but those numbers became more equal as time went on. Unfortunately, due to humanities extreme ignorance, we don’t see these issues recurring today. People discriminate against homosexuals, for example, and they don’t get equal rights. People must look to the past and use the knowledge of their mistakes to never make those same mistakes again.
In American culture today, women continue the struggle of identifying what their roles in society are supposed to be. Our culture has been sending mixed messages to the modern day female, creating a sense of uneasiness to an already confusing and stressful world. Although women today are encouraged more than ever to be independent, educated, and successful, they are often times shamed for having done just that. Career driven females are frequently at risk of being labeled as bossy, unfeminine, or selfish for competing in many career paths that were once dominated by men. A popular medium in our culture such as television continues to have significant influences as to how people should aspire to live their lives. Viewers develop connections with relatable characters and to relationship dynamics displayed within their favorite shows. Fictional characters and relationships can ultimately influence a viewer’s fashion sense, social and political opinion, and attitude towards gender norms. Since the days of Bewitched and I Dream of Jeanie, where women were commonly portrayed as being the endearing mischievous housewife, television shows have evolved in order to reflect real life women who were becoming increasingly more independent, educated, and career oriented throughout the subsequent decades. New genres of television are introduced, such as the workplace comedy, where women are not only career oriented, but eventually transition into positions of power.
The dynamic of gender roles within 1960s society is the most prominent issue within Mad Men. The show does not shy away from the conformity of the time. Behind the pristine hair and perfectly stylised clothes - the men are in control and the women are ultimately suppressed of any power.
In today’s world, the American still has barriers to overcome in the matter of racial equality. Whether it is being passed over for a promotion at the job or being underpaid, some people have to deal with unfair practice that would prevent someone of color or the opposite sex from having equal opportunity at the job. In 2004, Dukes vs. Wal-Mart Stores Incorporation was a civil rights class-action suite that ruled in favor of the women who worked and did not received promotions, pay and certain job assignments. This proves that some corporations ignore the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which protects workers from discrimination based on sex, race, religion or national origin.
While the 1960s were a time of advancement for minorities, it was also a time of advancement for women. In 1963, Congress passed the Equal Pay Act, which outlawed discrimination in the workplace based on a person’s sex (Foner 944). To ensure that women would have the same opportunities as men in jobs, education, and political participation, the National Organization for women was formed in 1966 (Foner 944). The sixties also marked the beginning of a public campaign to repeal state laws that banned abortion or left the decision to terminate a pregnancy to physicians instead of the woman (Foner 945).
Throughout her book the Second Shift Arlie Hochschild examines this modern oppression of women. She closely observes dozens of families and conducts countless interviews over the portion of about 10 years starting in the early 1970s. Her research provides an in depth analysis of...
Ann Perkins, Jones’ character, is supposed to be an ethnically ambiguous person and in reality, Rashida is biracial (Glamour). Leslie Knope, the white protagonist of the series, frequently uses words like ‘exotic’, ‘tropical’, and ‘ethnically ambiguous’ when complimenting Ann. The ‘compliments’ also act as the only instances where race is spoken about in reference to Ann’s character. One would believe that Leslie’s constant complimenting of Ann is beneficial to viewers with a biracial identity, but there are some serious problems with Leslie’s behavior. There has been an historical and recent fascination with ‘mixed’ children. This fascination has crossed over into fetishizatoin of biracial or mixed children and people. Biracial people are seen less as people and more as a kind of spice that bell hooks mentions in her work “Eating the Other: Desire and Resistance” (21). They are something that helps liven up the blandness of the pervasive white culture. Another harmful aspect of Ann’s depiction relates to her class. In Edison’s work, she notes that “biracial individuals living in a middle- and upper-class environments are more likely to be perceived as biracial (rather than black) than those living in working- and lower-class environments” and that “‘color blind’ portrayals of middle- and upper-class Black and biracial characters support the notion that race no longer matters (at least for middle- and upper-class people)” (Edison, 302; 304). Ann’s character is a successful college-educated nurse which is not problematic until one realizes that her race is never truly discussed. This feeds into the stereotype that race does not matter and that all people in the U.S. have the same opportunities. Again, the lack of racial representation leaves one character the duty of depicting a whole group of
In today’s age it can be difficult for many to imagine a world in which applicants were denied employment for factors such as their gender, race, religion or national origin. We have grown accustomed to living in a country that provides legislative protection in the case of discrimination in and outside the workforce. Yet, this was not always the case. It has been a mere 52 years since the illegalization of “discrimination in education, employment, public accommodations and the receipt of federal funds on the basis on race, color, gender, national origin and religion.”(BL pg.98) This new set of legislation is known as the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Although it did not make amends for year of abuse and discrimination,