Snowpiercer Humanity

1873 Words4 Pages

Perhaps one of the most human things we humans do is question what it means to be human. This is beyond asking what physical or phenotypical traits are necessary to consider a being human; it is a question of what behaviour constitutes being considered part of humanity. Bong Joon-Ho’s 2013 sci-fi thriller Snowpiercer is a movie about many things: progress, climate, class divides and, maybe in a subtler way, what it means to be human. As films so often have the power to do, it acts as a reflection of the audience’s own humanity. That is, it provides a channel for us to reflect on our own humanity. Bong depicts contrast between his characters, showing that perhaps some have retained more of their humanity than others. Conversely, no character …show more content…

This is apparent in the scene where Curtis and other revolutionaries reach the car where young children are being indoctrinated to worship the engine and fear the outside. One girl, upon seeing the tail enders, states, “I heard old tail sectioners were lazy dogs who slept all day in their own ***” (Snowpiercer). The upper class have been dehumanizing the tail enders and teaching their children to do the same. The dehumanization of the tail enders continues into the latter parts of the film, where it is revealed young Timmy and Andy are manually operating parts of the train to keep the engine going. The dehumanization of Timmy can also be related to his Blackness and the historical dehumanization and enslavement of Black people: “Life is disallowed especially with regards to Timmy… Recalling transatlantic slaveries from our world, Timmy’s “blackness” alludes to his occupation of the dehumanized position of a living instrument.” (Lee and Manicastri, 17). Despite this onscreen practice of dehumanizing tail enders, we the audience are made to see them as acting more humanly than their upper-class counterparts: they are concerned with the wellbeing of each other, are more compassionate and do not act like a sub-category of The Other. …show more content…

Unlike the others, he is not portrayed as subhuman, other than human or human; rather he is illustrated as a divine being above humans. He is illustrated as a god. The imagery and the vocabulary surrounding him contributes to this, such as “Wilford, divine keeper of the sacred engine,” “the benevolent Wilford,” “Wilford is divine, Wilford is merciful” (Snowpiercer). Some of the imagery includes the light and symmetry that surrounds him and the ritualistic hand movements. The idea of him as a god (primarily similar to that of the Judeo-Christian God) is further emphasised by his role as an omniscient presence and him being the creator of the train, which is often described in ways that parallel the idea of Mother Earth. He is also worshipped by the upper-class members of the train and his ideals are used to indoctrinate young children; actions that an audience might associate with religion and cultism. Wilford, however, is not as merciful as his followers would believe, and he displays an enormous lack of humanity despite claiming to be concerned with the continuation of the human race. According to Phillipe Rochat of Emory University, “The bottom-line of what it means to be human is the unique way we share resources to survive collectively. Brain size and mental capacities for language, self-conceptualization,

Open Document