Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of youth crimes
Consequences of youth crimes
Impacts of juvenile delinquency
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of youth crimes
With an understanding of smart decarceration, our team intended to lobby Nigel Sanchez, the Congressional Aide for Congressman Tony Cardenas. After researching several elected officials, our team chose him because he worked under a congressman that supported reforming the outdated juvenile justice systems making him an excellent candidate for our policy. Then we began to set up the meeting, we directly emailed Nigel to set up an appointment to meet with him at the district office. On the day of the meeting, our team started with an overview of the policy paper and our interest in promoting smart decarceration for juveniles. Our interest towards the issues comes from allowing juveniles who committed nonviolent crimes has a second chance at proving themselves with credits to have a new case. …show more content…
On the day of the lobby our team met with Nigel and had a fifteen minute lobby with him followed by some comments. In the end, Nigel agreed with our understanding of supporting Proposition 57 because the legislation gives juveniles and adults who committed nonviolent crimes a second chance. In addition, Nigel explains that Tony Cardenas has first had experience with gangs growing up. Gang prevention and juvenile justice are a top priority (Juvenile Justice & Safety, 2016). Consequently, he believes that locking the juveniles in camps or prisons allows the government to place fewer responsibilities on these people (N. Sanchez, October 27,
Within the last five years, violent offenses by children have increased 68 percent, crimes such as: murder, rape, assault, and robbery. Honestly, with these figures, it is not surprising at all that the Juveniles Courts focus less on the children in danger, and focus more on dangerous children. This in fact is most likely the underlying reasoning behind juveniles being tried as adults by imposing harsher and stiffer sentences. However, these policies fail to recognize the developmental differences between young people and
The adult system’s shifts leaked into the juvenile system, causing an increase in incarcerations even when delinquency rates were declining at the time. Juvenile reform legislations prompted more compulsory sentencing and more determinate sentences for juveniles, lowering of the upper age of juvenile jurisdiction, considerable ease in obtaining waivers to adult court for juvenile prosecution, and made it easier to gain access to juvenile records as well. Furthermore, it led to greater preoccupation with chronic, violent offenders, which in turn led to a redirection of resources for their confinement. Thereby, the absence of reliable criteria for identifying such offenders tends to stereotype all delinquents and is more likely to raise the level of precautionary confinements. These three major shifts in juvenile justice policy demonstrate the power and depth of traditional beliefs about the causes and cures of crimes in U.S. society. It also shows how the system can bend for a time in the direction of new approaches to prevention and control. Today, we are presently in a time of conservative responses where the prevailing views about crime express beliefs about prevention, retribution, and incapacitation that are profoundly rooted in our
Juvenile Justice Reforms in the United States. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2011, from Juvenile Transfer to Criminal Courts: http://www.ojjdp.gov
The Youth Criminal Justice Act has many concerns creating inequalities in the restorative justice approach. For instance, juvenile delinquents who develop from a background that is impoverished may lack the ability to satisfy the reparative objectives of punishment and may not be ready to be reintegrated back into socie...
Rather than robbing them of the chance to grow and become better human beings, though, the government has the ultimate responsibility to help transform these troubled youths into upstanding citizens—even if it is within the walls of a prison rather than a classroom or office building. Executing minors does nothing but remind us of America’s stubbornness to do what may take time but in the end is right.
...s A. Preciado, but despite these wrong decisions being made by juveniles, they deserve a second chance to better themselves as potential future citizens. Even Gail garinger who was a former juvenile judge believes that they are capable such manner, In her article, “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences” written March 14, 2012 and published by New York Times, it states that “as a former juvenile court judge, I have seen firsthand the enormous capacity of children to change and turn themselves around. The same malleability that makes them vulnerable to peer pressure also makes them promising candidates for rehabilitation”. I believe, and still do, that even though juveniles that have taken a wrong path, regardless of what they 've done, need guidance from us and people who were once juveniles to mentor them and be given a second chance, just as I did a long time ago.
On Thursday, December 1, 2016, ROY ONEAL MOODY died of unknown causes while incarcerated in the Winston County Jail at 25166 Alabama Highway 195, Double Springs, Alabama. Upon learning of MOODY’S death, Winston County Sheriff Tommy Moore contacted State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) Captain Jonathan Winters and requested an independent investigation into the events, which led to MOODY’S death.
Everybody deserves a chance to prove themselves Youths under the age of 18 will be able to avoid arrest or criminal charges if they agree to participate in a “diversion” program that aims to prevent repeat offences. It might help them find a job, beat a drug habit, deal with mental health troubles or bring them face to face with victims to recognize the impact of their crimes. The goal is to reduce recidivism by providing alternatives to custody and overburdened courts, where some youths are more likely to learn about getting lawyers and saying nothing than about remorse and going straight, said Insp. David Saunders, who is overseeing the new program says “Youth got a second chance; they weren’t criminalized,” Saunders said. “The victims were very happy. A lot of people aren’t looking for their pound of flesh by sending people to court. What they really want is for young people to learn. They want them to be remorseful and to understand: Don’t do it again.
juvenile justice” (Elrod & Ryder, 2011) is to detour juvenile crimes and not be so easy on
Studies and anecdotes have shown that our modern approach, however, is ill-equipped to reduce crime or deal with chronic delinquents while at the same time protecting their due liberties. We now stand on the precipice of decision: How can we strike an appropriate balance in the juvenile justice system? Should we even retain a separate system for children at all? The answers are usually difficult, sometimes subtle, but always possible to attain.
Another positive thing about trying juveniles as adults is that those juveniles are taken from their neighborhood, and by doing this it opens the eyes of other teens who are around watching everything that happens. “We once arrested a teen right in the middle of his block. You should've seen everyone out of their houses watching the incident.” ( Chief Hernandez, 62) According to his words he seemed surprised on how of an impact it was to the rest of the community watching. Reports showed that gang violence decreased in that neighborhood that year. Teens look out of what i...
Petteruti A (2009). The Justice Policy Institute . The Costs of Confinement: Why Good Juvenile Justice
Adam showed that the way our criminal justice system is working must change. By providing opportunities for young offenders versus a criminal record and incarceration can actually make our communities more positive and safer while also saving a substantial cost to tax dollars. I believe it will be a very lethargic process to make the necessary changes to our criminal justice system. The reason for this is the simple fact that it is a “system” already in motion and changes are never easy. However, Adam made a point to stress being more involved during election time to get the right District Attorney into office. Specifically, he said to ask three questions, and if any of those could not be answered, then that prosecutor should not be doing the job (Foss, 2016). Those questions are:
... even willing to die for money, so in order to truly address this juvenile delinquency problem we cannot just address the surface level social issues,but must also, and perhaps more importantly, focus on the economic foundation that motivates juveniles to continue a path of crime. Economic problems are the only factors that contribute to social issues, but the resources being wasted on these corrections facilities and other ineffective socially addressing programs should be better spent on improving the economic situation of communities. About one-quarter of juveniles who offended at ages 16-17 also offended as adults at ages 18-19, therefore the growing urgency and importance to address juvenile justice is undeniable, because by addressing juvenile delinquency you are addressing crime in general (“Child Maltreatment & Juvenile Delinquency: Facts and Figures").
was that the young offenders act has to be more strictly and changes are need.